Abstract
Purpose
Amid a political agenda for patient-centred healthcare, shared decision-making is reported to substantially improve patient experience, adherence to treatment and health outcomes. However, observational studies have shown that shared decision-making is rarely implemented in practice. The purpose of this study was to measure the prevalence of shared decision-making in clinical encounters involving physiotherapists and patients with back pain.
Method
Eighty outpatient encounters (comprising 40 h of data) were observed audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the 12-item OPTION scale. The higher the score, the greater is the shared decision-making competency of the clinicians.
Results
The mean OPTION score was 24.0 % (range 10.4–43.8 %).
Conclusion
Shared decision-making was under-developed in the observed back pain consultations. Clinicians’ strong desire to treat acted as a barrier to shared decision-making and further work should focus on when and how it can be implemented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Department of Health (2004) Improving chronic disease management. Department of Health, London
Coulter A, Collins A (2011) Making shared decision-making a reality. No decision about me, without me. The King’s Fund. http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/files/kf/Making-shared-decision-making-a-reality-paper-Angela-Coulter-Alf-Collins-July-2011.pdf. Accessed 11 June 2013
Makoul G, Clayman ML (2006) An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns 60(3):301–312. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.010
Elwyn G, Charles C (2009) Shared decision-making: the principles and the competencies. In: Edwards A, Elwyn G (eds) Evidence-based patient choice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 118–143
Wennberg DE, Marr A, Lang L, O’Malley S, Bennett G (2010) A randomized trial of a telephone care-management strategy. N Engl J Med 363(13):1245–1255
Elwyn G, Edwards A (2009) Shared decision-making in health care: achieving evidence-based patient choice, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Sandman L, Munthe C (2009) Shared decision-making and patient autonomy. Theor Med Bioeth 30(4):289–310
Loh A, Simon D, Willis CE, Kriston L, Niebling W, Hartner M (2007) The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 67(3):324–332
Politi MC, Clark MA, Ombao H, Dizon D, Elwyn G (2011) Communicating uncertainty can lead to less decision satisfaction: a necessary cost of involving patients in shared decision making? Health Expect 14(1):84–91
Burton D, Blundell N, Jones M, Fraser A, Elwyn G (2010) Shared decision-making in cardiology: do patients want it and do doctors provide it? Patient Educ Couns 80(2):173–179
Desroches S, Lapointe A, Deschênes SM, Gagnon MP, Légaré F (2011) Exploring dieticians’ salient beliefs about shared decision-making behaviours. Implement Sci 6(1):57
Wanless D (2002) Securing our future health: taking a long-term view. HM Treasury, London, p 39
King JS, Moulton BW (2006) Rethinking informed consent: the case for shared medical decision-making. Am J Law Med 32:429–501
Couët N, Desroches S, Robitaille H, Vaillancourt H, Leblanc A, Turcotte S et al (2013) Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Health Expect. doi:10.1111/hex.12054
Dierckx K, Deveugele M, Roosen P, Devisch I (2013) Implementation of shared decision making in physical therapy: observed level of involvement and patient preference. Phys Ther 93(10):1321–1330. doi:10.2522/ptj.20120286
Health Professions Council. http://www.hpc-uk.org/. Accessed 27 Nov 2013
Roberts L, Bucksey S (2007) Communicating with patients: what happens in practice? Phys Ther 87(5):586–594
Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Hood K, Atwell C, Grol R (2003) Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Qual Saf Health Care 12(2):93–99
Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A, Rapport F, Wensing M, Cheung WY et al (2005) The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expect 8(1):34–42
Elwyn G (2005) OPTION training pack: observing patient involvement. Evaluating the extent that clinicians involve patients in decisions. Department of Primary Care and Public Health, University of Cardiff
Pellerin MA, Elwyn G, Rousseau M, Stacey D, Robitaille H, Le′gare′ F (2011) Toward shared decision making: using the OPTION scale to analyse resident-patient consultations in family medicine. Acad Med 86(8):1010–1018
Légaré F, Ratté S, Stacey D, Kryworuchko J, Gravel K, Graham ID, Turcotte S (2010) Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (5):CD006732
Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thompson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P et al (2012) Shared decision-making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med 27(10):1361–1367
Parsons S, Harding G, Breen A, Foster N, Pincus T, Vogel S et al (2012) Will shared decision making between patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and physiotherapists, osteopaths and chiropractors improve patient care? Fam Pract 29(2):203–212
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge: the patients and staff in the former Southampton City Primary Care Trust. This work was conducted within the Southampton Musculoskeletal Research Unit. Arthritis Research UK for funding the fellowship of the lead researcher (LR).
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, L.E., Roberts, L.C., Little, P.S. et al. Shared decision-making in back pain consultations: an illusion or reality?. Eur Spine J 23 (Suppl 1), 13–19 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3187-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3187-0