Skip to main content
Log in

Early experience of MAGEC magnetic growing rods in the treatment of early onset scoliosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Magnetically controlled growing rod systems have been introduced over recent years as an alternative to traditional growing rods for management of early onset scoliosis. The purpose of this paper is to report our early experience of a magnetically controlled growing rod system (MAGEC, Ellipse).

Methods

Review of pre-operative, postoperative and follow-up Cobb angles and spinal growth in case series of eight patients with a minimum 23 months’ follow-up (23–36 months).

Results

A total of six patients had dual rod constructs implanted and two patients received single-rod constructs. Four patients had MAGEC rods as a primary procedure. Four were revisions from other systems. Mean age at surgery in the primary group was 4.5 years (range 3.9–6.9). In patients who had MAGEC as a primary procedure, mean pre-operative Cobb angle was 74° (63–94), with postoperative Cobb angle of 42° (32–56) p ≤ 0.001 (43 % correction). Mean Cobb angle at follow-up was 42° (35–50). Spinal growth rate was 6 mm/year. One sustained proximal screw pull out. A final patient sustained a rod fracture. Mean age at surgery in the revision group was 10.9 years (range 9–12.6). Mean pre-operative Cobb angle was 45° (34–69). Postoperative Cobb angle was 42° (33–63) (2 % correction). Mean Cobb angle at follow-up was 44° (28–67). Mean spinal growth rate was 12 mm/year. Two patients developed loss of distraction.

Conclusion

MAGEC growing rod system effectively controls early onset scoliosis when used as either a primary or revision procedure. Although implant-related complications are not uncommon, the avoidance of multiple surgeries following implantation is beneficial compared with traditional growing rod systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akbarnia BA et al (2008) Dual growing rod technique followed for three to eleven years until final fusion: the effect of frequency of lengthening. Spine 33(9):984–990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Akbarnia BA et al (2005) Dual growing rod technique for the treatment of progressive early onset scoliosis: a multicenter study. Spine 30(17 Suppl):S46–S57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Akbarnia BA et al (2013) Next generation of growth-sparing techniques. Spine 38(8):665–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bess S et al (2010) Complications of growing-rod treatment for early onset scoliosis: analysis of one hundred and forty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(15):2533–2543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Caldas JC, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Carneiro SR (2004) General anaesthesia, surgery and hospitalization in children and their effects upon cognitive, academic, emotional and socio behavioural development—a review. Paediatr Anaesth 14:910–915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cobb JR (1960) The problem of the primary curve. J Bone Joint Surg Am 42-A:1413–1425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheung K et al (2012) Magnetically controlled growing rods for severe spinal curvature in young children: a prospective case series. Lancet 379(9830):1967–1974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dannawi Z (2013) Early results of a remotely-operated magnetic growth rod in early onset scoliosis. Bone Joint J 95-B(1):75–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dimeglio A, Canavese F (2011) The growing spine: how spinal deformities influence normal spine and thoracic cage growth. Eur Spine J 21(1):64–70

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kain ZN, Wang SM, Mayes LC, Caramico LA, Hofstadter MB (1999) Distress during the induction of anaesthesia and postoperative behavioural outcomes. Anesth Analg 88:1042–1047

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kain ZN, Mayes LC, O’Connor TZ, Cicchetti DV (1996) Preoperative anxiety in children. Predictors and outcomes. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 150:1238–1245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Noordeen HM, Shah SA, Elsebaie HB (2011) In vivo distraction force and length measurements of growing rods: Which factors influence on the ability to lengthen? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821b8e16

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith JT, Campbell RM Jr (2012) Magnetically controlled growing rods for spinal deformity. Lancet 379(9830):1930–1931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wick J, Konze J (2012) A magnetic approach to treating progressive early onset scoliosis. Assoc Regist Nurses 96(2):163–173

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yang JS et al (2011) Growing rod fractures. Spine 36(20):1639–1644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Towriss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hickey, B.A., Towriss, C., Baxter, G. et al. Early experience of MAGEC magnetic growing rods in the treatment of early onset scoliosis. Eur Spine J 23 (Suppl 1), 61–65 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3163-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3163-0

Keywords

Navigation