Range of motion of thoracic spine in sagittal plane

Abstract

Study design

Imaging study of thoracic spine.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate dynamic alignment and range of motion (ROM) at all segmental levels of thoracic spine.

Summary of background data

Thoracic spine is considered to have restricted ROM because of restriction by the rib cage. However, angular movements of thoracic spine can induce thoracic compressive myelopathy in some patients. Although few previous studies have reported segmental ROM with regard to sagittal plane, these were based on cadaver specimens. No study has reported normal functional ROM of thoracic spine.

Methods

Fifty patients with cervical or lumbar spinal disease but neither thoracic spinal disease nor compression fracture were enrolled prospectively in this study (34 males, 16 females; mean age 55.4 ± 14.7 years; range 27–81 years). After preoperative myelography, multidetector-row computed tomography scanning was performed at passive maximum flexion and extension position. Total and segmental thoracic kyphotic angles were measured and ROM calculated.

Results

Total kyphotic angle (T1/L1) was 40.2° ± 11.4° and 8.5° ± 12.8° in flexion and extension, respectively (P < 0.0001). The apex of the kyphotic angle was at T6/7 in flexion. Total ROM (T1/L1) was 31.7° ± 11.3°. Segmental ROM decreased from T1/2 to T4/5 but increased gradually from T4/5 to T12/L1. Maximum ROM was at T12/L1 (4.2° ± 2.1°) and minimum at T4/5 (0.9° ± 3.0°).

Conclusions

Thoracic spine showed ROM in sagittal plane, despite being considered a stable region. These findings offer useful information in the diagnosis and selection of surgical intervention in thoracic spinal disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. 1.

    White AA et al (1990) Clinical biomechanics of the Spine, 2nd edn. JB Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, pp 103–107

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Panjabi MM, Takata K, Goel V et al (1991) Thoracic human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 16:888–901

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Panjabi MM, Hausfeld JN, White AA (1981) A biomechanical study of the ligamentous stability of the thoracic spine in man. Acta Orthop Scand 52:315–326

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kothe R, Panjabi MM, Liu W (1997) Multidirectional instability of the thoracic spine due to iatrogenic pedicle injuries during transpedicular fixation. A biomechanical investigation. Spine 22:1836–1842

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Nohara Y, Taneichi H, Ueyama K et al (2004) Nationwide survey on complications of spine surgery in Japan. J Orthop Sci 9:424–433

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ohtsuka K, Terayama K, Yanagihara M et al (1987) A radiological population study on the ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the spine. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 106:89–93

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ito K, Yukawa Y, Nakashima H et al (2009) Three cases of thoracic spinal cord injuries without fracture and dislocation. J Jpn Med Soc Spinal Cord Lesion 22:36–37 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bible JE, Biswas D, Miller CP et al (2010) Normal functional range of motion of the cervical spine during 15 activities of daily living. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:15–21

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bible JE, Biswas D, Miller CP et al (2010) Normal functional range of motion of the lumbar spine during 15 activities of daily living. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:106–112

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Yukawa Y, Kato F, Suda K et al (2012) Age-related changes in osseous anatomy, alignment, and range of motion of the cervical spine—part I, radiographic data from over 1200 asymptomatic subjects. Eur Spine J 21:1492–1498 (Epub 2012 Feb 4)

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH et al (1995) An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine 20:1351–1358

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No funds were received to support this work. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daigo Morita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morita, D., Yukawa, Y., Nakashima, H. et al. Range of motion of thoracic spine in sagittal plane. Eur Spine J 23, 673–678 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3088-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Range of motion
  • Thoracic spine
  • Sagittal plane
  • Multidetector-row CT
  • Dynamic alignment