Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Treatment of cervical disc herniation through percutaneous minimally invasive techniques

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The goal of this study is to compare the therapeutic effectiveness of percutaneous cervical discectomy, percutaneous cervical disc nucleoplasty, and a combination of the two for the treatment of cervical disc herniation and the effective stabilization of the cervical vertebral column.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed from February 2003 to April 2011. One hundred and seventy-one cervical disc herniation patients with a mean age of 47.8 years (ranging from 21 to 74 years) participated in the study and were treated with the three types of percutaneous minimally invasive techniques: percutaneous cervical discectomy (PCD, 97 cases), percutaneous cervical disc nucleoplasty (PCN, 50 cases), and a combination of the two (PCDN, 24 cases). After treatment, the postoperative clinical results and the stability of the cervical vertebral columns of these three groups were evaluated and compared.

Results

Patients in the PCD group received follow-up care for approximately 4.1 years (ranging from 0.2 to 8.5 years), while those in the PCN group received only an average of 2.6 years (ranging from 0.3 to 7.8 years), and the PCDN group received an average of 3.3 years (ranging from 0.2 to 8 years of follow-up). According to the Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system, the functional scores (JOA scores) differed significantly between the pre- and postoperative patients within the three groups (PCD t = 21.849, P = <0.05; PCN t = 14.503, P < 0.05; PCDN t = 8.555, P < 0.05). All patients had been successfully operated on by the same spinal surgeon team. According to the Odom criterion, the clinical outcomes were not significantly different for any of the three groups (the recovery rate using the JOA standard evaluation, F = 2.19, P = 0.116, P > 0.05). The percentages of each procedure that received either an excellent or a good rating were PCD at 81.35 %, PCN at 82.44 % and PCDN at 83.19 %. In addition, the clinical success rates among the three were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Notably, there was no postoperative instability of the cervical vertebral column in any of the patients (P > 0.05), and there was no difference in the pre- or postoperative stability of the cervical vertebral columns in each group.

Conclusions

Each group achieved good clinical outcomes with this safe, minimally invasive spinal surgery for the treatment of cervical disc herniation. In addition, no postoperative risk of cervical instability was found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stookey B (1928) Compression of the spinal cord due to ventral extradural cervical chondromas. Arch Neurol Psych 20:275–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mixter WJ, Barr JS (1934) Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med 211:210–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bailey RW, Badgley CE (1960) Stabilization of the cervical spine by anterior fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 42A:565–569

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cloward RB (1985) The treatment of ruptured lumbar intervertebral discs by vertebral body fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 193:5–15

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smith GW, Robinson RA (1958) The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 40:607–624

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirsch C (1960) Cervical disk rupture: diagnosis and therapy. Acta Orthop 30:172–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Robertson JT, Johnson SD (1980) Anterior cervical discectomy without fusion: long-term results. Clin Neurosurg 27:440–449

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fukushima T, Ishijima B, Hirakawa K et al (1973) Ventriculofiberscope: a new technique for endoscopic diagnosis and operation. J Neurosurg 38:251–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahanovitz N, Viola K, Goldstein T, Dawson E et al (1990) A multicenter analysis of percutaneous discectomy. Spine 15:713–715

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith L (1964) Enzyme dissolution of the nucleus pulposus in humans. JAMA 187:137–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith L, Garvin PJ, Jennings RB (1963) Enzyme dissolution of the nucleus pulposus. Nature 198:1311–1312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hijikata S (1989) Percutaneous nucleotomy. A new concept technique and 12 years’ experience. Clin Orthop 238:9–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ascher PW (1985) Status quo and new horizons of laser therapy in neurosurgery. Lasers Surg Med 5(5):499–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Li J, Yan DL, Zhang ZH (2008) Percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty in the treatment of cervical disc herniation. Eur Spine J 17:1664–1669

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yan DL, Li J, Zhu HD (2010) Percutaneous cervical nucleoplasty and percutaneous cervical discectomy treatments of the contained cervical disc herniation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:1371–1376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ahn Y, Lee SH, Lee SC (2004) Factors predicting excellent outcome of percutaneous cervical discectomy: analysis of 111 consecutive cases. Neuroradiology 46:378–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Odom GL, Finney W, Woodhall B (1958) Cervical disk lesions. Am Med Assoc 166:23–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Katsumi Y, Honma T, Nakamurs T (1989) Analysis of cervical instability resulting from laminectomies for removal of spine cord tumor. Spine 14:1171–1176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sim SE, Ko ES, Kim DK et al (2011) The results of cervical nucleoplasty in patients with cervical disc disorder: a retrospective clinical study of 22 patients. Korean J Pain 24:36–43

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Timmermann J, Hahn M, Krueger K (2011) Short-term follow-up: micro-invasive therapy of the cervical herniated disk by percutaneous nucleotomy. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 24:89–93

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Onik G, Helms CA, Ginsburb L (1985) Percutaneous lumbar discectomy using a new aspiration probe. AJNR 144:290–293

    Google Scholar 

  22. Greiner-Perth R, Böhm H, ElSaghir H et al (2002) The microscopic assisted percutaneous approach to posterior spine: a new minimally invasive procedure for treatment of spinal processes. Zentralbl Neurochir 63:7–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Choy DS (1998) Percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD): twelve years’ experience with 752 procedures in 518 patients. J Clin Laser Med Surg 16:325–331

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financed by Projects of Science and Technology of Guangdong province in 2008(2008 A030201015) and by Projects of Science and Technology of Guangzhou municipality in 2011(2011J4100052).

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 63 Duobao Road, Guangzhou, 510150, China

    Bo Yang, Jingkai Xie, Biao Yin, Le Wang, Shibing Fang & Shengyu Wan

Authors
  1. Bo Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jingkai Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Biao Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Le Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shibing Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shengyu Wan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, B., Xie, J., Yin, B. et al. Treatment of cervical disc herniation through percutaneous minimally invasive techniques. Eur Spine J 23, 382–388 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3063-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3063-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation