Abstract
Background/purpose
Measurement and classification of standing posture in the sagittal plane has important clinical implications for adolescent spinal disorders. Previous work using cluster analysis on three gross body segment orientation parameters (lower limbs, trunk, and entire body inclination) has identified three distinct postural groups of healthy subjects before pubertal peak growth: “neutral”, “sway-back”, and “leaning-forward”. Although accurate postural subgrouping may be proposed to be crucial in understanding biomechanical challenges posed by usual standing, there is currently no objective method available for class assignment. Hence, this paper introduces a novel approach to subclassify new cases objectively according to their overall sagittal balance.
Methods
Postural data previously acquired from 1,196 pre-peak height velocity (pre-PHV) subjects were used in this study. To derive a classification rule for assigning a class label (“neutral”, “sway-back”, or “leaning-forward”) to any new pre-PHV subjects, linear discriminant analysis was applied. Predictor variables were pelvic displacement, trunk lean and body lean angle. The performance of the newly developed classification algorithm was verified by adopting a cross-validation procedure.
Results
The statistical model correctly classified over 96.2 % of original grouped subjects. In the cross-validation procedure used, over 95.9 % of subjects were correctly assigned.
Conclusions
Based on three angular measures describing gross body segment orientation, our triage method is capable of reliably classifying pre-PHV subjects as either “neutral”, “sway-back”, or “leaning-forward”. The discriminant prediction equations presented here enable a highly accurate posture class allocation of new cases with a prediction capability higher than 95.9 %, thereby removing subjectivity from sagittal plane posture classification.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Scannell JP, McGill S (2003) Lumbar posture—should it, and can it, be modified? A study of passive tissue stiffness and lumbar position during activities of daily living. Phys Ther 83:907–917
Keller TS, Colloca CJ, Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Janik TJ (2005) Influence of spine morphology on intervertebral disc loads and stresses in asymptomatic adults: implications for the ideal spine. Spine J 5:297–309
Mitchell T, O’Sullivan PB, Burnett AF, Straker L, Smith A (2008) Regional differences in lumbar spinal posture and the influence of low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:152
Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG (1993) Muscles: testing and function, with posture and pain. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
Pezolato A, de Vasconcelos EE, Defino HLA, Nogueira-Barbosa MH (2012) Fat infiltration in the lumbar multifidus and erector spinae muscles in subjects with sway-back posture. Eur Spine J 21:2158–2164
Falla D, O’Leary S, Fagan A, Jull G (2007) Recruitment of the deep cervical flexor muscles during a postural-correction exercise performed in sitting. Man Ther 12:139–143
O’Sullivan PB, Grahamslaw KM, Kendell M et al (2002) The effect of different standing and sitting postures on trunk muscle activity in a pain-free population. Spine 27:1238–1244
Nissinen MJ, Heliövaara MM, Seitsamo JT, Könönen MH, Hurmerinta KA, Poussa MS (2000) Development of trunk asymmetry in a cohort of children ages 11 to 22 years. Spine 25:570–574
Dickson RA (1988) The aetiology of spinal deformities. Lancet 1:1151–1155
Janssen MMA, Drevelle X, Humbert L, Skalli W, Castelein RM (2009) Differences in male and female spino-pelvic alignment in asymptomatic young adults: a three-dimensional analysis using upright low-dose digital biplanar X-rays. Spine 34:E826–E832
Masi AT, Dorsch JL, Cholewicki J (2003) Are adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and ankylosing spondylitis counter-opposing conditions? A hypothesis on biomechanical contributions predisposing to these spinal disorders. Clin Exp Rheumatol 21:573–580
Patton GC, Viner R (2007) Pubertal transitions in health. Lancet 369:1130–1139
Dolphens M, Cagnie B, Coorevits P et al (2012) Sagittal standing posture and its association with spinal pain: a school-based epidemiological study of 1196 Flemish adolescents before age at peak height velocity. Spine 37:1657–1666
Dolphens M, Cagnie B, Vleeming A, Vanderstraeten G, Coorevits P, Danneels L (2012) A clinical postural model of sagittal alignment in young adolescents before age at peak height velocity. Eur Spine J 21:2188–2197
Dolphens M, Cagnie B, Coorevits P, Vleeming A, Danneels L (2013) Classification system of the normal variation in sagittal plane alignment: a study among young adolescent boys. Spine 38:E1003–E1012
Dolphens M, Cagnie B, Coorevits P, Vleeming A, Danneels L (2013) Classification system of the sagittal standing alignment in young adolescent girls. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2952-9
Dolphens M, Cagnie B, Vleeming A, Vanderstraeten G, Danneels L (2013) Gender differences in sagittal standing alignment before pubertal peak growth: the importance of subclassification and implications for spinopelvic loading. J Anat (revision submitted 07/2013. JANAT-2013-0136. Currently under review)
Malina RM, Bouchard C, Bar-Or O (2004) Growth, maturation, and physical activity. Human Kinetics, Champaign
Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal salignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 30:348–353
Smith A, O’Sullivan P, Straker L (2008) Classification of sagittal thoraco-lumbo-pelvic alignment of the adolescent spine in standing and its relationship to low back pain. Spine 33:2101–2107
Poussa MS, Heliövaara MM, Seitsamo JT, Könönen MH, Hurmerinta KA, Nissinen MJ (2005) Development of spinal posture in a cohort of children from the age of 11 to 22 years. Eur Spine J 14:738–742
Widhe T (2001) Spine: posture, mobility and pain. A longitudinal study from childhood to adolescence. Eur Spine J 10:118–123
Mirwald RL, Baxter-Jones ADG, Bailey DA, Beunen GP (2002) An assessment of maturity from anthropometric measurements. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:689–694
Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG (2000) Pattern classification. Wiley, New York, pp 117–120
Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE (1988) Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. PWS-Kent Publishing, Boston
Vandeginste BGM, Massart DL, Buydens LMC, De Jong S, Lewi PJ, Smeyers-Verbeke J (1998) Data handling in science and technology. Handbook of chemometrics and qualimetrics: part B. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam
Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL (2011) Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J 20(S5):S609–S618
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dolphens, M., Cagnie, B., Coorevits, P. et al. Posture class prediction of pre-peak height velocity subjects according to gross body segment orientations using linear discriminant analysis. Eur Spine J 23, 530–535 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3058-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3058-0