Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Surgical treatment of Scheuermann’s kyphosis using a combined antero-posterior strategy and pedicle screw constructs: efficacy, radiographic and clinical outcomes in 111 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

There is sparse literature on how best to correct Scheuermann’s kyphosis (SK). The efficacy of a combined strategy with anterior release and posterior fusion (AR/PSF) with regard to correction rate and outcome is yet to be determined.

Materials and methods

A review of a consecutive series of SK patients treated with AR/PSF using pedicle screw–rod systems was performed. Assessment of demographics, complications, surgical parameters and radiographs including flexibility and correction measures, proximal junctional kyphosis angle (JKA + 1) and spino-pelvic parameters was performed, focusing on the impact of curve flexibility on correction and clinical outcomes.

Results

111 patients were eligible with a mean age of 23 years, follow-up of 24 months and an average of eight levels fused. Cobb angle at fusion level was 68° preoperatively and 37° postoperatively. Flexibility on traction films was 34 % and correction rate 47 %. Postoperative and follow-up Cobb angles were highly correlated with preoperative bending films (r = 0.7, p < 0.05). Screw density rate was 87 %, with increased correction with higher screw density (p < 0.001, r = 0.4). Patients with an increased junctional kyphosis angle (JKA + 1) were at higher risk of revision surgery (p = 0.049). 22 patients sustained complication, and 21 patients had revision surgery. 42 patients with ≥24 months follow-up were assessed for clinical outcomes (follow-up rate for clinical measures was 38 %). This subgroup showed no significant differences regarding baseline parameters as compared to the whole group. Median approach-related morbidity (ArM) was 8.0 %, SRS-sum score was 4.0, and ODI was 4 %. There was a significant negative correlation between the SRS-24 self-image scores and the number of segments fused (r = −0.5, p < 0.05). Patients with additional surgery had decreased clinical outcomes (SRS-24 scores, p = 0.004, ArM, p = 0.0008, and ODI, p = 0.0004).

Conclusion

The study highlighted that AR/PSF is an efficient strategy providing reliable results in a large single-center series. Results confirmed that flexibility was the decisive measure when comparing surgical outcomes with different treatment strategies. Findings indicated that changes at the proximal junctional level were impacted by individual spino-pelvic morphology and determined by the individually predetermined thoracolumbar curvature and sagittal balance. Results stressed that in SK correction, reconstruction of a physiologic alignment is decisive to achieving good clinical outcomes and avoiding complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bradford DS, Moe JH, Montalvo FJ, Winter RB (1975) Scheuermann’s kyphosis. Results of surgical treatment by posterior spine arthrodesis in twenty-two patients. JBJS-A 57:439–448

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ascani E, Rosa G (1994) Scheuermann kyphosis. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Denis F, Sun EC, Winter RB (2009) Incidence and risk factors for proximal and distal junctional kyphosis following surgical treatment for Scheuermann kyphosis: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine 34:E729–E734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Griss P, von Andrian-Werburg HF (1978) Results of corrective surgery in juvenile kyphosis (Scheuermann’s disease) using Harrington’s compressive rods. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 91:113–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy J-P, Lafage V (2010) Adult spinal deformity—postoperative standing imbalance. Spine 35:2224–2231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor TC, Wenger DR, Stephen J, Gillespie R, Bobechko WP (1979) Surgical management of thoracic kyphosis in adolescents. JBJS-A 61:496–503

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Denis F (1983) Spinal instability as defined by the three-column spine concept in acute spinal trauma. Clin Orthop Rel Res 189:65–76

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hosman AJ, Langeloo DD, de Kleuver M, Anderson PG, Veth RP, Slot GH (2002) Analysis of the sagittal plane after surgical management for Scheuermann’s disease: a view on overcorrection and the use of an anterior release. Spine 27:167–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lonner BS, Murthy SK, Boachie-adjei O (2005) Single-staged double anterior and posterior spinal reconstruction for rigid adult spinal deformity: a report of four cases. The Spine J 5:104–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jansen RC, van Rhijn LW, van Ooij A (2006) Predictable correction of the unfused lumbar lordosis after thoracic correction and fusion in Scheuermann kyphosis. Spine 31:1227–1231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Coe JD, Smith JS, Berven S, Arlet V, Donaldson W, Hanson D, Mudiyam R, Perra J, Owen J, Marks MC, Shaffrey CI (2009) Complications of spinal fusion for Scheuermann kyphosis—a report of the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality committee. Spine 35:99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lowe G, Breton G (2007) Evidence based medicine. Anal Scheuermann Kyphosis 32:S115–S119

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lowe TG (1987) Double L-rod instrumentation in the treatment of severe kyphosis secondary to Scheuermann’s disease. Spine 12:336–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lowe TG, Kasten T (1994) An analysis of sagittal curves and balance after Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for kyphosis secondary to Scheuermann’s disease. A review of 32 patients. Spine 19:1680–1685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lowe TG (1999) Scheuermann’s disease. Orthop Clin North Am 30:475–487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tribus CB (1998) Scheuermann’s kyphosis in adolescents and adults: diagnosis and management. J Acad Orthop Surg 6:36–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bradford DS, Ahmed KB, Moe JH, Winter RB, Lonstein JE (1980) The surgical management of patients with Scheuermann’s disease: a review of twenty-four cases managed by combined anterior and posterior spine fusion. JBJS-A 62:705–712

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Speck GR, Chopin DC (1986) The surgical treatment of Scheuermann’s kyphosis. JBJS-Br 68:189–193

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsirikos AI, Jain AK (2011) Scheuermann’s kyphosis; current controversies. JBJS-Br 93:857–864

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sturm PF, Dobson JC, Armstrong GW (1993) The surgical management of Scheuermann’s disease. Spine 18:685–691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hamzaoglu A, Talu U, Tezer M, Mirzanli C, Domanic U, Goksan SB (2005) Assessment of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 30:1637–1642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferreira-Alves A, Resina J, Palma-Rodrigues R (1995) Scheuermann’s kyphosis. The Portuguese technique of surgical treatment. JBJS-Br 77:943–950

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Koptan WM, Elmiligui YH, Elsebaie HB (2009) All pedicle screw instrumentation for Scheuermann’s kyphosis correction: is it worth it? Spine J 9:296–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Papagelopoulos PJ, Klassen RA, Peterson HA, Dekutoski MB (2001) Surgical treatment of Scheuermann’s disease with segmental compression instrumentation. CORR 386:139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Glassmann SD, Hamill CL, Bridwell KH, Schwab FJ, Dimar JR, Lowe TG (2007) The impact of perioperative complications on clinical outcome in adult deformity surgery. Spine 32:2764–2770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Poolman RW, Been HD, Ubags LH (2002) Clinical outcome and radiographic results after operative treatment of Scheuermann’s disease. Eur Spine J 11:561–569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lim M, Green DW, Billinghurst JE, Huang RC, Rawlins BA, Widmann RF, Burke SW, Boachie-Adjei O (2004) Scheuermann kyphosis: safe and effective surgical treatment using multisegmental instrumentation. Spine 29:1789–1794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Herrera-Soto JA, Parikh SN, Al-Sayyad MJ, Crawford AH (2005) Experience with combined video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) anterior spinal release and posterior spinal fusion in Scheuermann’s kyphosis. Spine 30:2176–2181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee SS, Lenke LG, Kuklo TR, Valente L, Bridwell KH, Sides B, Blanke K (2006) Comparison of Scheuermann kyphosis correction by posterior-only thoracic pedicle screw fixation versus combined anterior/posterior fusion. Spine 31:2316–2321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lonner BS, Newton P, Betz R, Schaf C, O’Brien M, Sponseller P, Lenke L, Crawford A, Lowe T, Letko L, Harms J, Shufflebarger H (2007) Operative management of Scheuermann’s kyphosis in 78 patients: radiographic outcomes, complications, and technique. Spine 2007:2644–2652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. de Jonge T, Illes T, Bellyei G (2001) Surgical correction of Scheuermann’s kyphosis. Int Orthop 25:70–73

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wilk B, Karol LA, Johnston CE, Colby S, Haideri N (2006) The effect of scoliosis fusion on spinal motion: a comparison of fused and nonfused patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 31:309–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Baldus C, Blanke K, Schonecker PL (1993) Ability of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation to preserve distal lumbar motion segments in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord 6:339–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Betz RR, Harms J, Clements D, Lenke L, Low T, Jeszensky D, Shufflebarger HL, Beele B (1999) Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 24:225–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Marks M, Newton PO, Petcharaporn M, Bastrom TP, Shah S, Betz R, Lonner B, Miyanji F (2011) Postoperative segmental motion of the unfused spine distal to the fusion in 100 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Spine e-pub 2011

  36. Johnston CE, Elerson E, Dagher G (2005) Correction of adolescent hyperkyphosis with posterior-only threaded rod compression instrumentation: is anterior spinal fusion still necessary? Spine 30:1528–1534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cho K-J, Lenke L, Bridwell KH, Kamiya M, Sides B (2009) Selection of the optimal distal fusion level in posterior instrumentation and fusion for thoracic hyperkyphosis. Spine 34:765–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hamzaoglu A, Ozturk C, Korkmaz FM, Karatoprak O, Enercan M, Zezer M (2009) A new technique to prevent proximal junctional kyphosis in the surgical treatment of Scheuermann disease. IMAST, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  39. Otsuka NY, Hall JE, Mah JY (1990) Posterior fusion for Scheuermann’s kyphosis. CORR 251:134–139

    Google Scholar 

  40. Arlet V, Schlenzka D (2005) Scheuermann’s kyphosis: surgical treatment. Eur Spine J 14:817–827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ning Y, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Koester L (2011) How to determine optimal fusion levels of Scheuermann’s kyphosis. SRS annual meeting, Louisville

    Google Scholar 

  42. Clements DH, Betz RR, Newton PO, Rohmiller M, Marks MC, Bastrom T (2009) Correlation of scoliosis curve correction with the number and type of fixation anchors. Spine 34:2147–2150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Kim J, Cho SK, Cheh G, Yoon J (2007) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after 3 different types of posterior segmental spinal instrumentation and fusions—incidence and risk factor analysis of 410 cases. Spine 32:2731–2738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Denis F (2009) Sagittal spinal alignment: the true measurement, norms, and description of correction for thoracic kyphosis. J Spinal Disord 22:311–314

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lafage V, Bharucha NJ, Schwab F, Hart RA, Burton D, Boachie-Adjei O, Smith JS, Hostin R, Shaffrey C, Gupta M, Akbarnia BA, Bess S (2012) Multicenter validation of a formula predicting postoperative spinopelvic alignment. JNS 16:15–21

    Google Scholar 

  46. Abel MF, Herndon SK, Sauer LD, Novicoff WM, Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Spinal Deformity Study Group (2011) Selective versus nonselective fusion for idiopathic scoliosis: does lumbosacral takeoff angle change? Spine 36:1103–1112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 25:2940–2953

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Zenner J, Koller H, Hempfing A, Hutter J, Hitzl W, Resch H, Tauber M, Meier O, Ferraris L (2010) Approach-related morbidity in transthoracic anterior spine surgery: a clinical study and review of literature. Coluna Columna 9:72–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Arlet V (2000) Anterior thoracoscopic spine release in deformity surgery: a meta-analysis and review. Eur Spine J 9(Suppl 1):S17–S23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. German Scoliosis Center, Werner Wicker Clinic, Im Kreuzfeld 4, 34537, Bad Wildungen, Germany

    Heiko Koller, Zenner Juliane, Marianne Umstaetter & Oliver Meier

  2. Research Office, Biostatistics, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria

    Wolfgang Hitzl

  3. Orthopädisch-Unfallchirurgisches Zentrum , ALB FILS KLINIKEN, Göppingen, Germany

    René Schmidt

Authors
  1. Heiko Koller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zenner Juliane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marianne Umstaetter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Oliver Meier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. René Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wolfgang Hitzl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heiko Koller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koller, H., Juliane, Z., Umstaetter, M. et al. Surgical treatment of Scheuermann’s kyphosis using a combined antero-posterior strategy and pedicle screw constructs: efficacy, radiographic and clinical outcomes in 111 cases. Eur Spine J 23, 180–191 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2894-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2894-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation