Clinical relationship between cervical spinal canal stenosis and traumatic cervical spinal cord injury without major fracture or dislocation
- First Online:
- 549 Downloads
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical relationship between cervical spinal canal stenosis (CSCS) and incidence of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) without major fracture or dislocation, and to discuss the clinical management of traumatic CSCI.
Forty-seven patients with traumatic CSCI without major fracture or dislocation (30 out of 47 subjects; 63.83 %, had an injury at the C3–4 segment) and 607 healthy volunteers were measured the sagittal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) column diameter at five pedicle and five intervertebral disc levels using T2-weighted midsagittal magnetic resonance imaging. We defined the sagittal CSF column diameter of less than 8 mm as CSCS based on the previous paper. We evaluated the relative and absolute risks for the incidence of traumatic CSCI related with CSCS.
Using data from the Spinal Injury Network of Fukuoka, Japan, the relative risk for the incidence of traumatic CSCI at the C3–4 segment with CSCS was calculated as 124.5:1. Moreover, the absolute risk for the incidence of traumatic CSCI at the C3–4 segment with CSCS was calculated as 0.00017.
In our results, the relative risk for the incidence of traumatic CSCI with CSCS was 124.5 times higher than that for the incidence without CSCS. However, only 0.017 % of subjects with CSCS may be able to avoid developing traumatic CSCI if they undergo decompression surgery before trauma. Our results suggest that prophylactic surgical management for CSCS might not significantly affect the incidence of traumatic CSCI.
KeywordsCervical spinal canal stenosis Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury without major fracture or dislocation MRI Relative risk Absolute risk Prophylactic surgical management
- 5.Koyanagi I, Iwasaki Y, Hida K, Akino M, Imamura H, Abe H et al (2000) Acute cervical cord injury without fracture or dislocation of the spinal column. J Neurosurgery 93:15–20Google Scholar
- 6.Tator CH (1995) Clinical manifestations of acute spinal cord injury. In: Benzel EC, Tator CH (eds) Contemporary management of spinal cord injury. Park Ridge, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, pp 15–26Google Scholar
- 9.Takahashi M, Harada Y, Inoue H, Shimada K (2002) Traumatic cervical cord injury at C3–4 without radiographic abnormalities: correlation of magnetic resonance findings with clinical feature and outcome. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 10:129–135Google Scholar
- 14.Anderson PA, Steinmetz MP, Eck JC (2006) Head and neck injuries in athletes. In: Spivak JM, Connolly PJ (eds) Orthopaedic knowledge update: Spine 3. Rosemont, AAOS, pp 259–269Google Scholar
- 15.Sakai H, Ueta T, Shiba K (2010) Current situation of medical care for spinal cord injury in Japan (in Japanese). J Spine Res 1:41–51Google Scholar
- 23.Itoh Y, Mazaki T, Koshimune K, Morita T, Mizuno S (2011) Randomized controlled study of treatment for acute cervical cord injury with spinal canal stenosis but without radiographic evidence of trauma (SCIWORET): operative or conservative treatment. J Spine Res 2:965–967Google Scholar