Skip to main content
Log in

Single segment of posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: reduction or fusion in situ

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

We prospectively compared surgical reduction or fusion in situ with posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for adult isthmic spondylolisthesis in terms of surgical invasiveness, clinical and radiographical outcomes, and complications.

Methods

From January 2006 to June 2008, 88 adult patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis who underwent surgical treatment in our unit were randomized to reduced group (group 1, n = 45) and in situ group (group 2, n = 43), and followed up for average 32.5 months (range 24–54 months). The clinical and radiographical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results

The average operative time and blood loss during surgery showed insignificant difference (p > 0.05) between two groups. The radiological outcomes were significantly better in group 1, but there was no significant difference between two groups of clinical outcomes, depicting as VAS, ODI, JOA and patients’ satisfaction surveys. Incident rate of surgical complications was similar in two groups, but in group 1 the complication seemed more severe because of two patients with neurological symptoms.

Conclusions

For the adult isthmic spondylolisthesis without degenerative disease in adjacent level, single segment of PLIF with pedicle screw fixation is an effective and safe surgical procedure regardless of whether additional reduction had been conducted or not. Better radiological outcome does not mean better clinical outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Poussa M, Schlenzka D, Seitsalo S, Ylikoski M, Hurri H, Osterman K (1993) Surgical treatment of severe isthmic spondylolisthesis in adolescents: reduction or fusion in situ. Spine 18:894–901

    Google Scholar 

  2. Poussa M, Remes V, Lamberg T et al (2006) Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis in adolescence with reduction or fusion in situ: long-term clinical, radiologic, and functional outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(5):583–592

    Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson JR, Kirwan EO (1983) The long-term results of fusion in situ for severe spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 65:43–46

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mehdian SM, Arun R, Jones A, Cole AA (2005) Reduction of severe adolescent isthmic spondylolisthesis: a new technique. Spine 30(19):E579–E584

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sears W (2005) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lytic spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers. Spine J 5(2):161–169

    Google Scholar 

  6. Morelos O, Pozzo AO (2004) Selective instrumentation, reduction and repair in low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis. Int Orthop 28(3):180–182

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dick WT, Schnebel B (1988) Severe spondylolisthesis: reduction and internal fixation. Clin Orthop 232:70–79

    Google Scholar 

  8. Molinari RW, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Ungacta FF, Riew KD (1999) Complications in the surgical treatment of pediatric high-grade isthmic, dysplastic spondylolisthesis: a comparison of three surgical approaches. Spine 24:1701–1711

    Google Scholar 

  9. Molinari RW, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Baldus C (2002) Anterior column support in surgery for high-grade, isthmic spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop 394:109–120

    Google Scholar 

  10. Muschik M, Zippel H, Perka C (1997) Surgical management of severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents: anterior fusion in situ versus anterior spondylodesis with posterior transpedicular instrumentation and reduction. Spine 22:2036–2043

    Google Scholar 

  11. Taillard W (1954) Le spondylolisthesis chez l’enfant et l’adolescent (etude 50 cas). Acta Orthop Scand 24:115

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meyerding HW (1932) Spondylolisthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 54:371–378

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cobb J (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. In: Edwards JW (ed) Instructional course lectures. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, Ann Arbor, pp 261–275

  14. Kwon BK, Berta S, Daffner SD et al (2003) Radiographic analysis of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(5):469–476

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao J, Hou T, Wang X, Ma S (2003) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using one diagonal fusion cage with transpedicular screw/rod fixation. Eur Spine J 12(2):173–177

    Google Scholar 

  16. Okuda S, Oda T, Miyauchi A et al (2006) Surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(12):2714–2720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Greenough CG, Peterson MD, Hadlow S, Fraser RD (1998) Instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion. Spine 23:479–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grzegorzewski A, Kumar SJ (2000) In situ posterolateral spine arthrodesis for grades III, IV, and V spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 20:506–511

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. DeWald R (1997) Spondylolisthesis. In: Bridwell K, DeWald R (eds) The textbook of spinal surgery, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 1202–1210

    Google Scholar 

  20. Harry LS, Matthew JG (2005) High-grade isthmic dysplastic spondylolisthesis: monosegmental surgical treatment. Spine 30(6S):S42–S48

    Google Scholar 

  21. Spruit M, Pavlov PW, Leitao J, De Kleuver M, Anderson PG, Den Boer F (2002) Posterior reduction and anterior lumbar interbody fusion in symptomatic low-grade adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: short term radiological and functional outcome. Eur Spine J 11:428–433

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith J, Deviren V, Berven S, Kleinstueck F, Bradford D (2001) Clinical outcome of trans-sacral interbody fusion after partial reduction for high-grade L5–S1 spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2227–2234

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mehdian SH, Arun R (2011) A new three-stage spinal shortening procedure for reduction of severe adolescent isthmic spondylolisthesis: a case series with medium- to long-term follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(11):E705–E711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaneda K, Satoh S, Nohara Y et al (1985) Distraction rod instrumentation with posterolateral fusion in isthmic spondylolisthesis: 53 cases followed for 18–89 months. Spine 10:383–389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Voor MJ, Mehta S, Wang M et al (1998) Biomechanical evaluation of posterior and anterior lumbar interbody fusion techniques. J Spinal Dis 11:328–334

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ekman P, Möller H, Tullberg T, Neumann P, Hedlund R (2007) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(20):2178–2183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Madan S, Boeree NR (2002) Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(14):1536–1542

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Edward Cunningham J, Elling EM, Milton AH, Robertson PA (2011) What is the optimum fusion technique for adult isthmic spondylolisthesis-PLIF or PLF? A long-term prospective cohort comparison study. J Spinal Disord Tech (Epub ahead of print)

  29. Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ, Lee JH, Cho KJ, Kim HG (1997) Adding posterior lumbar interbody fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine 22(2):210–219 (discussion 219–20)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Floman Y, Millgram MA, Ashkenazi E, Smorgick Y, Rand N (2008) Instrumented slip reduction and fusion for painful unstable isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults. J Spinal Disord Tech 21(7):477–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Audat ZM, Darwish FT, Al Barbarawi MM, Obaidat MM, Haddad WH, Bashaireh KM, Al-Aboosy IA (2011) Surgical management of low grade isthmic spondylolisthesis; a randomized controlled study of the surgical fixation with and without reduction. Scoliosis 6(1):14

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Michael R, Hannjorg K, Robert PM et al (2006) Anatomic reduction and monosegmental fusion in high-grade developmental spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(3):269–274

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ani N, Keppler L, Biscup RS, Steffee AD (1991) Reduction of high-grade slips (grades III–V) with VSP instrumentation: report of a series of 41 cases. Spine 16(suppl):S302–S310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian-Guang Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lian, XF., Hou, TS., Xu, JG. et al. Single segment of posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: reduction or fusion in situ. Eur Spine J 23, 172–179 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2858-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2858-6

Keywords

Navigation