Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Correction of pelvic obliquity in neuromuscular spinal deformities using the “T construct”: results and complications in a prospective series of 60 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We present the results of a prospective series of 60 patients treated for neuromuscular spinal deformities with an original spinopelvic construct using two sacral screws and two iliac screws. Clinical and radiological results obtained with this new surgical technique were studied and discussed according to the epidemiological data and relevant literature.

Methods

From January 2008 to June 2010, the clinical data of every patient who underwent spinopelvic fixation for treatment of a neuromuscular spinal deformity were recorded prospectively.

Results

Sixty patients were operated on during the study period. Spinal correction and fusion was performed by posterior approach. In six patients with a residual spinopelvic imbalance more than 15° on lateral preoperative bending films, an anterior release of the thoracolumbar junction was performed on the same day, before posterior correction. Preoperative pelvic obliquity (PO) ranged from 4° to 44° (mean 21.6°). Postoperative pelvic obliquity ranged from 0° to 14 (mean 4.6°). No significant loss of correction was noted at the last follow-up. One patient died 3 months after the initial procedure due to respiratory compromise. 11 patients had early postoperative infections of the posterior approach.

Conclusions

Despite a high rate of infectious complications, optimal correction of pelvic obliquity requires extension of spinal instrumentation to the pelvis. Spinopelvic fixation remains a difficult challenge in neurological patients with hypotrophy. We think that pelvic fixation with the “T construct” did provide effective and improved spinal stabilization in these patients, while reducing the need for a postoperative cast or brace. As a result, patients had a favourable postoperative course with early mobilization and return to a comfortable sitting position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lipton GE, Miller F, Dabney KW, Altiok H, Bachrach SJ (1999) Factors predicting postoperative complications following spinal fusions in children with cerebral palsy. J Spinal Disord 12:197–205

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tsirikos AI, Mains E (2011) Surgical correction of spinal deformity in patients with cerebral palsy using pedicle screw instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e318227728c

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tsirikos AI, Chang WN, Dabney KW, Miller F (2004) Comparison of parents’ and caregivers’ satisfaction after spinal fusion in children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop 24:54–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Modi HN, Suh SW, Hong JY, Park YH, Yang JH (2011) Surgical correction of paralytic neuromuscular scoliosis with poor pulmonary functions. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:325–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arlet V, Marchesi D, Papin P, Aebi M (1999) The ‘MW’ sacropelvic construct: an enhanced fixation of the lumbosacral junction in neuromuscular pelvic obliquity. Eur Spine J 8:229–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Erickson MA, Oliver T, Baldini T, Bach J (2004) Biomechanical assessment of conventional unit rod fixation versus a unit rod pedicle screw construct: a human cadaver study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:1314–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gau YL, Lonstein JE, Winter RB, Koop S, Denis F (1991) Luque–Galveston procedure for correction and stabilization of neuromuscular scoliosis and pelvic obliquity: a review of 68 patients. J Spinal Disord 4:399–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lonstein JE (1994) The Galveston technique using Luque or Cotrel–Dubousset rods. Orthop Clin North Am 25:311–320

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zahi R, Vialle R, Abelin K, Mary P, Khouri N, Damsin JP (2010) Spinopelvic fixation with iliosacral screws in neuromuscular spinal deformities: results in a prospective cohort of 62 patients. Childs Nerv Syst 26:81–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Miladi LT, Ghanem IB, Draoui MM, Zeller RD, Dubousset JF (1997) Iliosacral screw fixation for pelvic obliquity in neuromuscular scoliosis. A long-term follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:1722–1729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ould-Slimane M, Miladi L, Rousseau MA, Bonaccorsi R, Catonne Y, Lazennec JY, Pascal-Moussellard H (2011) Sacropelvic fixation with iliosacral screws: applications and results in adult spinal deformities. J Spinal Disord Tech. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31823f6280

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vialle R, Delecourt C, Morin C (2006) Surgical treatment of scoliosis with pelvic obliquity in cerebral palsy: the influence of intraoperative traction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:1461–1466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zahi R, Thevenin-Lemoine C, Rogier A, Constantinou B, Mary P, Vialle R (2011) The “T-construct” for spinopelvic fixation in neuromuscular spinal deformities. Preliminary results of a prospective series of 15 patients. Childs Nerv Syst 27:1931–1935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moon ES, Nanda A, Park JO, Moon SH, Lee HM, Kim JY, Yoon SP, Kim HS (2011) Pelvic obliquity in neuromuscular scoliosis: radiologic comparative results of single-stage posterior versus two-stage anterior and posterior approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:146–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moreau M, Mahood J, Moreau K, Berg D, Hill D, Raso J (2002) Assessing the impact of pelvic obliquity in post-operative neuromuscular scoliosis. Stud Health Technol Inform 91:481–485

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Swank SM, Cohen DS, Brown JC (1989) Spine fusion in cerebral palsy with L-rod segmental spinal instrumentation. A comparison of single and two-stage combined approach with Zielke instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:750–759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dubousset J, Guillaumat M, Miladi L, Beurier J, Tassin JL, Cotrel Y (1987) Correction and fusion to the sacrum of the oblique pelvis using C.D. instrumentation in children and adults. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 73(Suppl 2):164–167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sink EL, Newton PO, Mubarak SJ, Wenger DR (2003) Maintenance of sagittal plane alignment after surgical correction of spinal deformity in patients with cerebral palsy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:1396–1403

    Google Scholar 

  19. Girardi FP, Boachie-Adjei O, Rawlins BA (2000) Safety of sublaminar wires with Isola instrumentation for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:691–695

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Marchesi D, Arlet V, Stricker U, Aebi M (1997) Modification of the original Luque technique in the treatment of Duchenne’s neuromuscular scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 17:743–749

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lonstein JE, Koop SE, Novachek TF, Perra JH (2011) Results and complications following spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis in cerebral palsy and static encephalopathy using luque galveston instrumentation: experience in 93 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318225ebd5

  22. Phillips JH, Gutheil JP, Knapp DR Jr (2007) Iliac screw fixation in neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:1566–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Peelle MW, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Sides B (2006) Comparison of pelvic fixation techniques in neuromuscular spinal deformity correction: galveston rod versus iliac and lumbosacral screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2392–2398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Comstock CP, Leach J, Wenger DR (1998) Scoliosis in total-body-involvement cerebral palsy. Analysis of surgical treatment and patient and caregiver satisfaction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:1412–1424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tsirikos AI, Lipton G, Chang WN, Dabney KW, Miller F (2008) Surgical correction of scoliosis in pediatric patients with cerebral palsy using the unit rod instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1133–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Edwards BT, Zura R, Bertrand S, Leonard S, Pellett J (2003) Treatment of neuromuscular scoliosis with posterior spinal fusion using the Galveston technique: a retrospective review and results of 62 patients. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 13:437–444

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Benson ER, Thomson JD, Smith BG, Banta JV (1998) Results and morbidity in a consecutive series of patients undergoing spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:2308–2317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Teli M, Elsebaie H, Biant L, Noordeen H (2005) Neuromuscular scoliosis treated by segmental third-generation instrumented spinal fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:430–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raphaël Vialle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bouyer, B., Bachy, M., Zahi, R. et al. Correction of pelvic obliquity in neuromuscular spinal deformities using the “T construct”: results and complications in a prospective series of 60 patients. Eur Spine J 23, 163–171 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2847-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2847-9

Keywords

Navigation