Abstract
Purpose
To examine the prognosis and prognostic factors for patients with chronic low back pain presenting to a private, community-based, group exercise program.
Methods
A total of 118 consecutive patients with chronic LBP were recruited. Baseline assessments included socio-demographic characteristics, back pain history and clinical examination findings. Primary outcome measures were pain intensity and disability at 3, 6 and 12 months. Potential prognostic factors to predict pain intensity and disability at 12 months were assessed using a multivariate regression model.
Results
112 (95 %) participants were followed up at 12 months. The majority of participants were female (73 %), had high educational levels (82 %) and resided in suburbs with a high socio-economic status (99 %). Pain intensity improved markedly during the first 6 months (35 %) with further minimal reductions up to 12 months (39 %). Interestingly, disability improved to a greater degree than pain (48 % improvement at 6 months) and continued to improve throughout the 12 months (60 %). Baseline pain intensity accounted for 10 % of the variance in the 1 year pain outcomes. Duration of current episode, baseline disability and educational level accounted for 15 % of the variation in disability at 12 months.
Conclusions
During a period of 12 months, patients with chronic LBP presenting to a private, community-based, group exercise program improved markedly, with greater improvements in disability than pain. The predictors investigated accounted for only 10 and 15 % of pain and disability outcomes, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, Zanoli G (2006) European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J 15:192–300
LdCM Costa, Maher CG, Hancock MJ, McAuley JH, Hebert RD, Costa LOP (2012) The prognosis of acute and persistent low-back pain: a meta-analysis. CMAJ 184(11):E613–E624
Burton AK, McClune TD, Clarke RD, Main CJ (2004) Long-term follow-up of patients with low back pain attending for manipulative care: outcomes and predictors. Man Ther 9(1):30–35
de Vet HCW, Heymans MW, Dunn KM, Pope DP, van der Beek AJ, Macfarlane GJ, Bouter LM, Croft OR (2002) Episodes of low back pain: a proposal for uniform definitions to be used in research. Spine 27:2409–2416
Grotle M, Foster NE, Dunn KM, Croft P (2010) Are prognostic indicators for poor outcome different for acute and chronic low back pain consulters in primary care? Pain 151:790–797
Hayden JA, Dunn KM, van der Windt DA, Shaw WS (2010) What is the prognosis of back pain? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 24(2):167–179
Hayden JA, Chou R, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C (2009) Systematic reviews of low back pain prognosis had variable methods and results: guidance for future prognosis reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 62:781–796
Costa Lda C, Maher CG, McAuley JH, Hancock MJ, Herbert RD, Refshauge KM, Henschke N (2009) Prognosis for patients with chronic low back pain: inception cohort study. BMJ 339:b3829
Melzack R (2001) Pain and the Neuromatrix in the Brain. J Dent Educ 65(12):1378–1382
Bouvier AL (2008) Physiocise moviment for life: Backs, brains, breathing. Physiocise, Australia
Bouvier AL, Fleming J (2010) The feel good body: 7 steps to easing aches and looking great. Harper Collins, Australia
Pengel LHM, Refshauge KM, Maher CG (2004) Responsiveness of pain, disability, and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain. Spine 29(8):879–883
Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 8(2):141–144
Scrimshaw SV, Maher CG (2001) Responsiveness of Visual Analogue and McGill Pain Scale Measures. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 24(8):501–504
Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, Roland M, Von Korff M, Waddell G (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 23(18):2003–2012
Westaway MD, Stratford PW, Binkley JM (1998) The patient-specific functional scale: validation of lts use in persons with neck dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 27(5):331–338
Miller RP, Kori S, Todd D (1991) The Tampa Scale: a measure of kinesiophobia. Clin J Pain 7(1):51–52
Harrell FE, Lee KL (1984) Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction. Stat Med 3:143–152
van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Metsemakers JFM, Bouter LM (1998) Chronic low back pain in primary care: a prospective study on the management and course. Fam Pract 15:126–132
Lambeek LC, van Mechelen W, Knol DL, Loisel P, Anema JR (2010) Randomised controlled trial of integrated care to reduce disability from chronic low back pain in working and private life. BMJ 340:c1035
Guzman J, Esmail R, Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Irvin E, Bombardier C (2001) Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review. BMJ 322:1511–1516
Bekkering GE, Hendriks HJM, van Tulder MW, Knol LD, Simmonds MJ, Oostendorp RAB, Bouter LM (2005) Prognostic factors for low back pain in patients referred for physiotherapy: comparing outcomes and varying modeling techniques. Spine 30:1881–1886
Acknowledgments
We thank all staff at the Willoughby and Stadium Physiocise clinics for their valuable assistance and support of this study.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steffens, D., Hancock, M.J., Maher, C.G. et al. Prognosis of chronic low back pain in patients presenting to a private community-based group exercise program. Eur Spine J 23, 113–119 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2846-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2846-x