Influence of industry on scientific reports

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Finance TUSSCo (2012) Staff report on Medtronic’s influence on Infuse clinical studies. In. USA Government printing office, Washington, http://www.finance.senate.gov/newsroom/chairman/release/?id=b1d112cb-230f-4c2e-ae55-13550074fe86, accessed December 23th, 2012

  2. 2.

    Medtronic (2012) Medtronic response to senate finance committee staff report on Infuse® bone graft http://wwwpmedtroniccom/Newsroom/NewsReleaseDetailsdo?itemId=1351134925127&lang=en_US, accessed December 23th, 2012

  3. 3.

    Greenhalgh T (2010) How to read a paper. The basics of evidence-based medicine. Wiley-Blackwell, London 62–79

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bartels RH, Delye H, Boogaarts J (2012) Financial disclosures of authors involved in spine research: an underestimated source of bias. Eur Spine J 21:1229–1233. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-2086-x

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bartels RH (2009) Evidence-based medicine: a marketing tool in spinal surgery. Neurosurgery 64:E1206. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000346236.51716.F5

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald H. M. A. Bartels.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartels, R.H.M.A. Influence of industry on scientific reports. Eur Spine J 22, 1690–1691 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2703-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Intellectual Property
  • Financial Disclosure
  • Disc Prosthesis
  • Author Group
  • Royalty Payment