Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

HIZ’s relation to axial load and low back pain: investigated with axial loaded MRI and pressure controlled discography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 21 November 2012

Abstract

Purpose

The aims were to investigate if the detection of high-intensity zones (HIZ) is affected by axial load, and to study the correlation between HIZ and discogenic pain provoked with pressure controlled discography (PCD).

Methods

41 consecutive patients with chronic low back pain, referred for discography, were included. Each patient underwent PCD, CT, MRI, and axial loaded MRI (alMRI) within 24 h. 35 patients completed all MRI sequences (140 discs). The detection of HIZ was compared between conventional MRI and alMRI. PCD was performed in 119 of the discs examined at MRI. Provoked pain at PCD was classified into four categories (none/unfamiliar/similar/exact), with the patients’ daily pain as reference, and correlated with presence of HIZ.

Results

AlMRI did not affect the detection of HIZ compared with conventional MRI. No significant correlation between HIZ and the 4-graded pain response at discography was found (p = 0.34), neither when combining similarly/exactly reproduced pain (p = 0.08). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of HIZ in detecting discs with exactly reproduced pain were 49, 69, 39 and 76 %. When combining similarly/exactly reproduced pain, PPV was higher but still only 70 %.

Conclusions

The detection of HIZ was not influenced by axial load. With strict PCD, discogenic pain can neither be confirmed when having HIZ (PPV 39 %) nor ruled out in discs without HIZ (NPV 76 %). Larger PCD studies including quantification of HIZ at conventional and alMRI are needed, before any dynamic component affected by axial load can be ruled out completely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aprill C, Bogduk N (1992) High-intensity zone: a diagnostic sign of painful lumbar disc on magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 65:361–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Peng B, Hou S, Wu W, Zhang C, Yang Y (2006) The pathogenesis and clinical significance of a high-intensity zone (HIZ) of lumbar intervertebral disc on MR imaging in the patient with discogenic low back pain. Eur Spine J 15:583–587. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0892-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lim CH, Jee WH, Son BC, Kim DH, Ha KY, Park CK (2005) Discogenic lumbar pain: association with MR imaging and CT discography. Eur J Radiol 54:431–437. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.05.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lei D, Rege A, Koti M, Smith FW, Wardlaw D (2008) Painful disc lesion: can modern biplanar magnetic resonance imaging replace discography? J Spinal Disord Tech 21:430–435. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e318153f7e4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carragee EJ, Paragioudakis SJ, Khurana S (2000) 2000 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies: lumbar high-intensity zone and discography in subjects without low back problems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2987–2992

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Saifuddin A, Braithwaite I, White J, Taylor BA, Renton P (1998) The value of lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging in the demonstration of anular tears. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:453–457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ricketson R, Simmons JW, Hauser BO (1996) The prolapsed intervertebral disc. The high-intensity zone with discography correlation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:2758–2762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Neill C, Kurgansky M, Kaiser J, Lau W (2008) Accuracy of MRI for diagnosis of discogenic pain. Pain Physician 11:311–326

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lam KS, Carlin D, Mulholland RC (2000) Lumbar disc high-intensity zone: the value and significance of provocative discography in the determination of the discogenic pain source. Eur Spine J 9:36–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schellhas KP, Pollei SR, Gundry CR, Heithoff KB (1996) Lumbar disc high-intensity zone. Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and discography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:79–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ito M, Incorvaia KM, Yu SF, Fredrickson BE, Yuan HA, Rosenbaum AE (1998) Predictive signs of discogenic lumbar pain on magnetic resonance imaging with discography correlation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:1252–1258 (discussion 1259–1260)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yoshida H, Fujiwara A, Tamai K, Kobayashi N, Saiki K, Saotome K (2002) Diagnosis of symptomatic disc by magnetic resonance imaging: T2-weighted and gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:193–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Min K, Fuchs B, Pfirrmann CW, Boos N (2001) Painful lumbar disk derangement: relevance of endplate abnormalities at MR imaging. Radiology 218:420–427

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zuo J, Joseph GB, Li X, Link TM, Hu SS, Berven SH, Kurhanewitz J, Majumdar S (2012) In vivo intervertebral disc characterization using magnetic resonance spectroscopy and T1rho imaging: association with discography and Oswestry Disability Index and Short Form-36 Health Survey. Spine 37(3):214–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kang CH, Kim YH, Lee SH, Derby R, Kim JH, Chung KB, Sung DJ (2009) Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately predict concordant pain provocation during provocative disc injection? Skeletal Radiol 38:877–885. doi:10.1007/s00256-009-0709-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rankine JJ, Gill KP, Hutchinson CE, Ross ER, Williamson JB (1999) The clinical significance of the high-intensity zone on lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1913–1919 (discussion 1920)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Neill C, Kurgansky M (2004) Subgroups of positive discs on discography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:2134–2139. doi:00007632-200410010-00009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Derby R, Kim BJ, Lee SH, Chen Y, Seo KS, Aprill C (2005) Comparison of discographic findings in asymptomatic subject discs and the negative discs of chronic LBP patients: can discography distinguish asymptomatic discs among morphologically abnormal discs? Spine J 5:389–394. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2005.01.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Alyas F, Sutcliffe J, Connell D, Saifuddin A (2010) Morphological change and development of high-intensity zones in the lumbar spine from neutral to extension positioning during upright MRI. Clin Radiol 65:176–180. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2009.02.023

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Danielson B, Willen J (2001) Axially loaded magnetic resonance image of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic individuals. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2601–2606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Derby R, Kim BJ, Chen Y, Seo KS, Lee SH (2005) The relation between annular disruption on computed tomography scan and pressure-controlled diskography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:1534–1538. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.02.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cicchetti DV, Sparrow SA (1981) Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. Am J Ment Defic 86:127–137

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Derby R, Lee SH, Lee JE (2011) Comparison of pressure-controlled provocation discography using automated versus manual syringe pump manometry in patients with chronic low back pain. Pain Med 12:18–26. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00990.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee J, Kim YD, Park CG, Kim MY, Chang IY, Zuo DC, Shahi PK, Choi S, Yeum CH, Jun JY (2012) Neurotensin modulates pacemaker activity in interstitial cells of Cajal from the mouse small intestine. Mol Cells. doi:10.1007/s10059-012-2290-5

    Google Scholar 

  25. Beattie PF, Brooks WM, Rothstein JM, Sibbitt WL Jr, Robergs RA, MacLean T, Hart BL (1994) Effect of lordosis on the position of the nucleus pulposus in supine subjects. A study using magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:2096–2102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen JY, Ding Y, Lv RY, Liu QY, Huang JB, Yang ZH, Liu SL (2011) Correlation between MR imaging and discography with provocative concordant pain in patients with low back pain. Clin J Pain 27:125–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Seo KS, Derby R, Date ES, Lee SH, Kim BJ, Lee CH (2007) In vitro measurement of pressure differences using manometry at various injection speeds during discography. Spine J 7:68–73. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2006.05.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hebelka H, Gaulitz A, Nilsson A, Holm S, Hansson T (2010) The transfer of disc pressure to adjacent discs in discography: a specificity problem? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:E1025–E1029. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181dc9e0f

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by funds from University of Gothenburg (ALF) and Gothenburg Medical Society.

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standard

Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hebelka Hanna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hanna, H., Tommy, H. HIZ’s relation to axial load and low back pain: investigated with axial loaded MRI and pressure controlled discography. Eur Spine J 22, 734–739 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2501-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2501-y

Keywords

Navigation