Skip to main content

Pelvic tilt and trunk inclination: new predictive factors in curve progression during the Milwaukee bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

European Spine Journal volume 21, pages 2050–2058 (2012)Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Previous studies had shown that sagittal spinal and pelvic morphology may be associated with the development and progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, but the predictive value of initial spinal and pelvic morphology on the curve progression during brace treatment is unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relation between initial spinopelvic morphology and the risk of curve progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the Milwaukee brace.

Materials and methods

From 2002 to 2007, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (single thoracic curve with apex at or above T8) was treated with the Milwaukee brace in 60 girls. Initial standing, full-length lateral radiographs were made and seven sagittal radiographic parameters of spinal and pelvic alignment were measured. Patients were followed until skeletal maturity or progression of Cobb angle >45°. The progression of curve was defined as an increase of Cobb angle ≥6° at final follow-up or progression to surgery during brace treatment.

Results

The 45 patients (75.0 %) who had successful control of curve progression were initially significantly more skeletally mature (higher mean Risser sign) than the 15 patients (25.0 %) who had curve progression. The initial mean Cobb angle was similar between the stable and progressed groups. The mean pelvic tilt, T1-spinopelvic inclination and T9-spinopelvic inclination angles were significantly greater in the stable group than in the progressed group and these three angles were independent predictors for curve progression during brace treatment. There were no significant differences between the stable and progressed groups in initial mean pelvic incidence, sacral slope, thoracic kyphosis or lumbar lordosis angles. Pre-bracing pelvic tilt ≤−0.5° was strongly predictive and T1-spinopelvic inclination ≤3.5° was moderately predictive of curve progression during the Milwaukee brace treatment.

Conclusions

Initial pelvic tilt and spinopelvic inclination angles may predict the curve progression and treatment outcome of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the Milwaukee brace.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Abelin K, Vialle R, Lenoir T, Thevenin-Lemoine C, Damsin JP, Forin V (2008) The sagittal balance of the spine in children and adolescents with osteogenesis imperfecta. Eur Spine J 17:1697–1704. doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0793-8

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O, Roussouly P (2007) Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J 16:1459–1467. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-0294-6

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrey C, Roussouly P, Perrin G, Le Huec JC (2011) Sagittal balance disorders in severe degenerative spine. Can we identify the compensatory mechanisms? Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):626–633. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1930-3

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bunnell WP (1986) The natural history of idiopathic scoliosis before skeletal maturity. Spine 11:773–776

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carr WA, Moe JH, Winter RB, Lonstein JE (1980) Treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in the Milwaukee brace. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:599–612

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Carreon LY, Puno RM, Lenke LG, Richards BS, Sucato DJ, Emans JB, Erickson MA (2007) Non-neurologic complications following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2427–2432. doi:10.2106/jbjs.f.00995

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chanplakorn P, Wongsak S, Woratanarat P, Wajanavisit W, Laohacharoensombat W (2010) Lumbopelvic alignment on standing lateral radiograph of adult volunteers and the classification in the sagittal alignment of lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1626-0

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Endo K, Suzuki H, Tanaka H, Kang Y, Yamamoto K (2009) Sagittal spinal alignment in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-1240-1

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guo X, Chau WW, Chan YL, Cheng JC (2003) Relative anterior spinal overgrowth in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Results of disproportionate endochondral-membranous bone growth. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:1026–1031

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang J, Qiu Y, Mao S, Zhao Q, Qian B, Zhu F (2010) The influence of elastic orthotic belt on sagittal profile in adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis: a comparative radiographic study with Milwaukee brace. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:219. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-11-219

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Katz DE, Durrani AA (2001) Factors that influence outcome in bracing large curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 26:2354–2361

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lazennec JY, Brusson A, Rousseau MA (2011) Hip-spine relations and sagittal balance clinical consequences. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):686–698. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1937-9

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Le Huec JC, Aunoble S, Philippe L, Nicolas P (2011) Pelvic parameters: origin and significance. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):564–571. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1940-1

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Le Huec JC, Roussouly P (2011) Sagittal spino-pelvic balance is a crucial analysis for normal and degenerative spine. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):556–557. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1943-y

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Le Huec JC, Saddiki R, Franke J, Rigal J, Aunoble S (2011) Equilibrium of the human body and the gravity line: the basics. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):558–563. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1939-7

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lonstein JE, Winter RB (1994) The Milwaukee brace for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A review of one thousand and twenty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:1207–1221

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lonstein JE (2003) Milwaukee brace treatment of scoliosis. Scoliosis Research Society Bracing Manual (http://www.srs.org/professionals/education_materials/SRS_bracing_manual/index.htm.)

  18. Luk KD, Lee CF, Cheung KM, Cheng JC, Ng BK, Lam TP, Mak KH, Yip PS, Fong DY (2010) Clinical effectiveness of school screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a large population-based retrospective cohort study. Spine 35:1607–1614. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c7cb8c

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H, Charlebois M, Huot MP, de Guise JA (2003) Sagittal plane analysis of the spine and pelvis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis according to the coronal curve type. Spine 28:1404–1409. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000067118.60199.D1

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mac-Thiong JM, Berthonnaud E, Dimar JR 2nd, Betz RR, Labelle H (2004) Sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis during growth. Spine 29:1642–1647 (pii: 00007632-200408010-00012)

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H, Berthonnaud E, Betz RR, Roussouly P (2007) Sagittal spinopelvic balance in normal children and adolescents. Eur Spine J 16:227–234. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0013-8

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H, Roussouly P (2011) Pediatric sagittal alignment. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):586–590. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1925-0

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mac-Thiong JM, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Guigui P (2011) Age- and sex-related variations in sagittal sacropelvic morphology and balance in asymptomatic adults. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):572–577. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1923-2

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Qiu Y, Sun X, Cheng JC, Zhu F, Li W, Zhu Z, Wang B, Yu Y (2008) Bone mineral accrual in osteopenic and non-osteopenic girls with idiopathic scoliosis during bracing treatment. Spine 33:1682–1689. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817b5b9e

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Richards BS, Bernstein RM, D’Amato CR, Thompson GH (2005) Standardization of criteria for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace studies: SRS committee on bracing and nonoperative management. Spine 30:2068–2075 (discussion 2076–2067)

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Roussouly P, Nnadi C (2010) Sagittal plane deformity: an overview of interpretation and management. Eur Spine J 19:1824–1836. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1476-9

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL (2011) Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):609–618. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1928-x

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, Farcy JP (2009) Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine 34:1828–1833. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a13c08

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Soucacos PN, Zacharis K, Gelalis J, Soultanis K, Kalos N, Beris A, Xenakis T, Johnson EO (1998) Assessment of curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 7:270–277

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tan KJ, Moe MM, Vaithinathan R, Wong HK (2009) Curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis: follow-up study to skeletal maturity. Spine 34:697–700. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c9431

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Upadhyay SS, Nelson IW, Ho EK, Hsu LC, Leong JC (1995) New prognostic factors to predict the final outcome of brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 20:537–545

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Upasani VV, Tis J, Bastrom T, Pawelek J, Marks M, Lonner B, Crawford A, Newton PO (2007) Analysis of sagittal alignment in thoracic and thoracolumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how do these two curve types differ? Spine 32:1355–1359. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318059321d

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vijvermans V, Fabry G, Nijs J (2004) Factors determining the final outcome of treatment of idiopathic scoliosis with the Boston brace: a longitudinal study. J Pediatr Orthop B 13:143–149

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JCY, Danielsson A, Morcuende JA (2008) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 371:1527–1537

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wu H, Ronsky JL, Cheriet F, Harder J, Kupper JC, Zernicke RF (2011) Time series spinal radiographs as prognostic factors for scoliosis and progression of spinal deformities. Eur Spine J 20:112–117. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1512-9

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ylikoski M (2005) Growth and progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in girls. J Pediatr Orthop B 14:320–324

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yrjonen T, Ylikoski M, Schlenzka D, Poussa M (2007) Results of brace treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in boys compared with girls: a retrospective study of 102 patients treated with the Boston brace. Eur Spine J 16:393–397. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-0167-z

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhu F, Qiu Y, Yeung HY, Lee KM, Cheng JC (2006) Histomorphometric study of the spinal growth plates in idiopathic scoliosis and congenital scoliosis. Pediatr Int 48:591–598. doi:10.1111/j.1442-200X.2006.02277.x

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Stryker China Ltd.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China

    Jing Guo, Zhen Liu, Feng Lv, Zezhang Zhu, Bangping Qian, Xing Zhang, Xiaolong Lin, Xu Sun & Yong Qiu

Authors
  1. Jing Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhen Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Feng Lv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zezhang Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bangping Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xing Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xiaolong Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xu Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yong Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Qiu.

Additional information

J. Guo and Z. Liu contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guo, J., Liu, Z., Lv, F. et al. Pelvic tilt and trunk inclination: new predictive factors in curve progression during the Milwaukee bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 21, 2050–2058 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2409-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2409-6

Keywords

  • Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
  • Spinopelvic morphology
  • Brace treatment
  • Curve progression