Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Kinetic magnetic resonance imaging analysis of lumbar segmental mobility in patients without significant spondylosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine lumbar segmental mobility using kinetic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with minimal lumbar spondylosis.

Methods

Mid-sagittal images of patients who underwent weight-bearing, multi-position kinetic MRI for symptomatic low back pain or radiculopathy were reviewed. Only patients with a Pfirrmann grade of I or II, indicating minimal disc disease, in all lumbar discs from L1–2 to L5–S1 were included for further analysis. Translational and angular motion was measured at each motion segment.

Results

The mean translational motion of the lumbar spine at each level was 1.38 mm at L1–L2, 1.41 mm at L2–L3, 1.14 mm at L3–L4, 1.10 mm at L4–L5 and 1.01 mm at L5–S1. Translational motion at L1–L2 and L2–L3 was significantly greater than L3–4, L4–L5 and L5–S1 levels (P < 0.007). The mean angular motion at each level was 7.34° at L1–L2, 8.56° at L2–L3, 8.34° at L3–L4, 8.87° at L4–L5, and 5.87° at L5–S1. The L5–S1 segment had significantly less angular motion when compared to all other levels (P < 0.006). The mean percentage contribution of each level to the total angular mobility of the lumbar spine was highest at L2–L3 (22.45 %) and least at L5/S1 (14.71 %) (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

In the current study, we evaluated lumbar segmental mobility in patients without significant degenerative disc disease and found that translational motion was greatest in the proximal lumbar levels whereas angular motion was similar in the mid-lumbar levels but decreased at L1–L2 and L5–S1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Farfan HF (1982) Instability of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 165:110–123

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Murata M, Morio Y, Kuranobu K (1994) Lumbar disc degeneration and segmental instability:a comparison of magnetic resonance images and plain radiographs of patients with low back pain. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 113:297–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fujiwara A, Lim TH, An HS et al (2000) The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 25:3036–3044

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Iguchi T, Kanemura A, Kasahara K, Kurihara A, Doita M, Yoshiya S (2003) Age distribution of three radiologic factors for lumbar instability: probable aging process of the instability with disc degeneration. Spine 28:2628–2633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Frobin W, Brinckmann P, Leivseth G et al (1996) Precision measurement of segmental motion from flexion–extension radiographs of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 11:457–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ochia RS, Inoue N, Renner SM et al (2006) Three-dimensional in vivo measurement of lumbar spine segmental motion. Spine 31:2073–2078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Steffen T, Rubin R, Baramki HG, Antoniou J, Marchesi D, Aebi M (1996) A new technique for measuring lumbar segmental motion in vivo: method, accuracy, and preliminary results. Spine 22:156–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M et al (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 26:1873–1878

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kong MH, Hymanson HJ, Song KY, Chin DK, Cho YE, Yoon do H et al (2009) Kinetic magnetic resonance imaging analysis of abnormal segmental motion of the functional spine unit. J Neurosurg Spine 10:357–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kong MH, Morishita Y et al (2009) Lumbar segmental mobility according to the grade of the disc, the facet joint, the muscle, and the ligament pathology by using kinetic magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 34:2537–2544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zou J, Yan H, Miyasaki M, Wei F, Hong SW, Yoon SH, Morishita Y, Wang JC (2008) Missed lumbar disc herniations diagnosed with kinetic magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 33(5):E140–E144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fitzgerald GK, Wynveen KJ, Rheault W et al (1983) Objective assessment with establishment of normal values for lumbar spinal range of motion. Phys Ther 63:1776–1781

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Harada M, Abumi K, Ito M et al (2000) Cineradiographic motion analysis of normal lumbar spine during forward and backward flexion. Spine 25:1932–1937

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Okawa A, Shinomiya K, Komori H et al (1998) Dynamic motion study of the whole lumbar spine by videofluoroscopy. Spine 23:1743–1749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kauppila LI, Eustace S, Kiel DP et al (1998) Degenerative displacement of lumbar vertebrae. A 25-year followup study in Framingham. Spine 23:1868–1874

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vogt MT, Rubin D, Valentin RS et al (1998) Lumbar spondylolisthesis and lower back symptoms in elderly white women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. Spine 23:2640–2647

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Karadimas EJ, Siddiqui M, Smith FW, Wardlaw D (2006) Positional MRI changes in supine versus sitting postures in patients with degenerative lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:495–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Morishita Y, Ohta H, Naito M, Matsumoto Y, Huang G, Tatsumi M, Takemitsu Y, Kida H (2011) Kinematic evaluation of the adjacent segments after lumbar instrumented surgery: a comparison between rigid fusion and dynamic non-fusion stabilization. Eur Spine J 20(9):1480–1485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee CK (1988) Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 13:375–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC et al (2004) Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine 29:1938–1944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN et al (2004) Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am A 86:1497–1503

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lee CK, Langrana NA (1984) Lumbosacral spinal fusion: a biomechanical study. Spine 9:574–581

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Weinhoffer SL, Guyer RD, Herbert M et al (1995) Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. Spine 20:526–531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Umehara S, Zindrick MR, Patwardhan AG et al (2000) The biomechanical effect of postoperative hypolordosis in instrumented lumbar fusion on instrumented and adjacent spinal segments. Spine 25:1617–1624

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Akamuru T, Kawahara N, Tim Yoon S et al (2003) Adjacent segment motion after simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 28:1560–1566

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Spine Department, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China

    Yanlin Tan & Chang Lu

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Room 76-143 CHS, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA

    Bayan G. Aghdasi, Scott R. Montgomery, Hirokazu Inoue & Jeffrey C. Wang

Authors
  1. Yanlin Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bayan G. Aghdasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Scott R. Montgomery
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hirokazu Inoue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chang Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jeffrey C. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott R. Montgomery.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tan, Y., Aghdasi, B.G., Montgomery, S.R. et al. Kinetic magnetic resonance imaging analysis of lumbar segmental mobility in patients without significant spondylosis. Eur Spine J 21, 2673–2679 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2387-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2387-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation