European Spine Journal

, Volume 21, Issue 12, pp 2531–2538 | Cite as

No difference in 9-year outcome in CLBP patients randomized to lumbar fusion versus cognitive intervention and exercises

  • Anne Froholdt
  • Olav Reikeraas
  • Inger Holm
  • Anne Keller
  • Jens Ivar Brox
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the 9-year outcome in patients with chronic low back pain treated by instrumented lumbar fusion versus cognitive intervention and exercises.

Methods

The main outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcome measures included pain, fear-avoidance beliefs, trunk muscle strength, medication, and return to work.

Results

One-third of the patients randomized to cognitive intervention and exercises had crossed over and been operated and one-third of the patients allocated to lumbar fusion had been re-operated. The intention-to-treat analysis detected no differences between the two groups. The mean adjusted treatment effect for ODI was 1.9 (95 % CI −7.8 to 11.6). Analysed according to the treatment received, more operated patients used pain medication and were out of work.

Conclusions

The outcome at 9 years was not different between instrumented lumbar fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises.

Keywords

Randomized clinical trial Low back pain Long-term outcome Operative Physical therapy 

References

  1. 1.
    Cowan JA Jr, Dimick JB, Wainess R et al (2006) Changes in the utilization of spinal fusion in the United States. Neurosurgery 59:15–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P et al (2001) 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 26:2521–2532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brox JI, Sorensen R, Friis A et al (2003) Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine 28:1913–1921PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fairbank J, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J et al (2005) Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC Spine Stabilisation Trial. BMJ 330:1233–1239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brox JI, Reikeras O, Nygaard O et al (2006) Lumbar instrumented fusion compared with cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic back pain after previous surgery for disc herniation: a prospective randomized controlled study. Pain 122:145–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brox JI, Nygaard OP, Holm I et al (2010) Four-year follow-up of surgical versus non-surgical therapy for chronic low back pain. Ann Rheum Dis 69:1643–1648PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nguyen TH, Randolph DC, Talmage J et al (2011) Long-term outcomes of lumbar fusion among workers’ compensation subjects: a historical cohort study. Spine 36:320–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB et al (1980) The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK (2003) Cross-cultural adaptation of the Norwegian versions of the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Index. J Rehabil Med 35:241–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holm I, Friis A, Storheim K et al (2003) Measuring self-reported functional status and pain in patients with chronic low back pain by postal questionnaires: a reliability study. Spine 28:828–833PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hagg O, Fritzell P, Romberg K et al (2001) The General Function Score: a useful tool for measurement of physical disability. Validity and reliability. Eur Spine J 10:203–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grotle M, Vollestad NK, Veierod MB et al (2004) Fear-avoidance beliefs and distress in relation to disability in acute and chronic low back pain. Pain 112:343–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK (2004) Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain. Spine 29:E492–E501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I et al (1993) A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain 52:157–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Andrews FM, Robinson JP, Shaver PR et al. (1991) Measures of subjective well-being. Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hyytiainen K, Salminen JJ, Suvitie T et al (1991) Reproducibility of nine tests to measure spinal mobility and trunk muscle strength. Scand J Rehabil Med 23:3–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keller A, Hellesnes J, Brox JI (2001) Reliability of the isokinetic trunk extensor test, Biering–Sorensen test, and Astrand bicycle test: assessment of intraclass correlation coefficient and critical difference in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy individuals. Spine 26:771–777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karatas GK, Gogus F, Meray J (2002) Reliability of isokinetic trunk muscle strength measurement. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 81:79–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Crisostomo RA, Schmidt JE, Hooten WM et al (2008) Withdrawal of analgesic medication for chronic low-back pain patients: improvement in outcomes of multidisciplinary rehabilitation regardless of surgical history. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 87:527–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Diwan AD, Parvartaneni H, Cammisa F (2003) Failed degenerative lumbar spine surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 34:309–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hagg O, Fritzell P (2003) Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine 28:1913–1921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brox JI, Sorensen R, Friis A et al (2004) Re: Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine 29:1160–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Froholdt
    • 1
  • Olav Reikeraas
    • 1
  • Inger Holm
    • 2
  • Anne Keller
    • 3
  • Jens Ivar Brox
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
  2. 2.Department of PhysiotherapyOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
  3. 3.Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationOslo University HospitalOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations