Skip to main content

Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain and its relationship with relaxin levels during pregnancy: a systematic review

Abstract

Purpose

The present systematic review assessed the level of evidence for the association between relaxin levels and pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPGP) during pregnancy.

Methods

PRISMA guidelines were followed to conduct this systematic review. Electronic search was carried out using six different databases. Observational cohorts, cross-sectional or case–control studies focused on the association between relaxin levels and PPGP during pregnancy were included. Studies selection was conducted by two reviewers who screened firstly for titles, then for abstracts and finally for full articles. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale and the quality of evidence by the guidelines proposed by the Cochrane back review group.

Results

731 references were identified. Six articles met the inclusion criteria and were considered for this systematic review. The main reason for the studies exclusion was PPGP related to gynaecological reasons. Five studies were case–control and one study was a prospective cohort. Four studies were ranked as high while two were ranked as low quality. Among the high quality studies, three found no association between PPGP and relaxin levels.

Conclusions

Based on these findings, the level of evidence for the association between PPGP and relaxin levels was found to be low. PPGP assessment and controlling for risk factors were found to increase bias leaving uncertainty in interpretation of these findings and a need for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. 1.

    Vleeming A et al (2008) European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J 17(6):794

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Rost CC et al (2004) Pelvic pain during pregnancy: a descriptive study of signs and symptoms of 870 patients in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(22):2567–2572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gutke A, Josefsson A, Oberg B (2007) Pelvic girdle pain and lumbar pain in relation to postpartum depressive symptoms. Spine Phila Pa (1976) 32(13):1430–1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Mens JM et al (1999) The active straight leg raising test and mobility of the pelvic joints. Eur Spine J 8(6):468–473

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mens JMA, Pool-Goudzwaard A, Stam HJ (2009) Mobility of the pelvic joints in pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 64(3):200–208

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ritchie JR (2003) Orthopedic considerations during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 46(2):456–466

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Snijders CJ, Vleeming A, Stoeckart R (1993) Transfer of lumbosacral load to iliac bones and legs: Part 1: biomechanics of self-bracing of the sacroiliac joints and its significance for treatment and exercise. Clin Biomech 8(6):285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Snijders C, Vleeming A, Stoeckart R (1993) Transfer of lumbosacral load to iliac bones and legs: part 2: loading of the sacroiliac joints when lifting in a stooped posture. Clin Biomech 8(6):295–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Pool-Goudzwaard A et al (2001) The sacroiliac part of the iliolumbar ligament. J Anat 199(04):457–463

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Vleeming A, Stoeckart R, Snijders C (1989) The sacrotuberous ligament: a conceptual approach to its dynamic role in stabilizing the sacroiliac joint. Clin Biomech 4(4):201–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Vleeming A et al (1996) The function of the long dorsal sacroiliac ligament: its implication for understanding low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21(5):556–562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Pool-Goudzwaard A et al (2003) The iliolumbar ligament: its influence on stability of the sacroiliac joint. Clin Biomech 18(2):99–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Varga E, Dudas B, Tile M (2008) Putative proprioceptive function of the pelvic ligaments: biomechanical and histological studies. Injury 39(8):858–864

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nilsson-Wikmar L et al (2005) Effect of three different physical therapy treatments on pain and activity in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain: a randomized clinical trial with 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up postpartum. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(8):850–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Mens JM et al (2006) The mechanical effect of a pelvic belt in patients with pregnancy-related pelvic pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 21(2):122–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ho SS et al (2009) Effectiveness of maternity support belts in reducing low back pain during pregnancy: a review. J Clin Nurs 18(11):1523–1532

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Heckman JD, Sassard R (1994) Musculoskeletal considerations in pregnancy. J Bone Jt Surg Ser A 76(11):1720–1731

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Petersen LK et al (1995) Variations in serum relaxin (hRLX-2) concentrations during human pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 74(4):251–256

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hisaw FL (1926) Experimental relaxation of the pubic ligament of the guinea pig. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 23(23):661–663

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Samuel CS et al (1996) The effect of relaxin on collagen metabolism in the nonpregnant rat pubic symphysis: the influence of estrogen and progesterone in regulating relaxin activity. Endocrinology 137(9):3884–3890

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Unemori EN, Amento EP (1990) Relaxin modulates synthesis and secretion of procollagenase and collagen by human dermal fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 265(18):10681–10685

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bell R et al (1987) Relaxin in human pregnancy serum measured with an homologous radioimmunoassay. Obstet Gynecol 69(4):585

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Owens K, Pearson A, Mason G (2002) Pubic symphysis separation. Fetal Matern Med Rev 13(2):141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Schauberger CW et al (1996) Peripheral joint laxity increases in pregnancy but does not correlate with serum relaxin levels. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174(2):667–671

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Borg-Stein J, Dugan SA (2007) Musculoskeletal disorders of pregnancy, delivery and postpartum. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 18(3):459–476, ix

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    MacLennan AH, MacLennan SC (1997) Symptom-giving pelvic girdle relaxation of pregnancy, postnatal pelvic joint syndrome and developmental dysplasia of the hip. The Norwegian Association for Women with Pelvic Girdle Relaxation (Landforeningen for Kvinner Med Bekkenlosningsplager). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76(8):760–764

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    van Dongen PWJ et al (1999) Hypermobility and peripartum pelvic pain syndrome in pregnant South African women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 84(1):77–82

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Moher D et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4): 264–269, W64

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Berlin JA (1997) Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? University of Pennsylvania Meta-analysis Blinding Study Group. Lancet 350(9072):185–186

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Furlan AD et al (2009) 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(18):1929–1941

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wells G et al (2011) The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Insitute. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm. Accessed 15 Jul 2011

  32. 32.

    Wai EK et al (2010) Causal assessment of occupational bending or twisting and low back pain: results of a systematic review. Spine J 10(1):76–88

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Roffey DM et al (2010) Causal assessment of awkward occupational postures and low back pain: results of a systematic review. Spine J 10(1):89–99

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wu WH et al (2004) Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence. Eur Spine J 13(7):575

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Albert HB et al (2006) Risk factors in developing pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85(5):539–544

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Biering K et al (2010) Smoking and pregnancy-related pelvic pain. BJOG 117(8):1019–1026

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Robinson HS et al (2010) Pelvic girdle pain—associations between risk factors in early pregnancy and disability or pain intensity in late pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:91

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Bjelland EK et al (2010) Pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy: the impact of parity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(2):146 e1–e6

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Björklund K et al (2000) Symphyseal distention in relation to serum relaxin levels and pelvic pain in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79(4):269–275

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Knobil E, Neill JD (2006) The physiology of reproduction, vol 1, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  41. 41.

    Kristiansson P, Svardsudd K, vonSchoultz B (1996) Serum relaxin, symphyseal pain, and back pain during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(5):1342–1347

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kristiansson P, Svärdsudd K, von Schoultz B (1999) Reproductive hormones and aminoterminal propeptide of type III procollagen in serum as early markers of pelvic pain during late pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(1):128–134

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    MacLennan AH et al (1986) Serum relaxin and pelvic pain of pregnancy. Lancet 2(8501):243–245

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Hansen A et al (1996) Relaxin is not related to symptom-giving pelvic girdle relaxation in pregnant women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 75(3):245–249

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Albert H et al (1997) Circulating levels of relaxin are normal in pregnant women with pelvic pain. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 74(1):19–22

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Petersen LK, Hvidman L, Uldbjerg N (1994) Normal serum relaxin in women with disabling pelvic pain during pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 38(1):21–23

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Albert H, Godskesen M, Westergaard J (2000) Evaluation of clinical tests used in classification procedures in pregnancy-related pelvic joint pain. Eur Spine J 9(2):161–166

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Gutke A, Kjellby-Wendt G, Oberg B (2010) The inter-rater reliability of a standardised classification system for pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain. Man Ther 15(1):13–18

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Mens JM et al (2001) Reliability and validity of the active straight leg raise test in posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(10):1167–1171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Robinson HS et al (2010) Pelvic girdle pain, clinical tests and disability in late pregnancy. Man Ther 15(3):280–285

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Artal R, Toole MO, White S (2003) Guidelines of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists for exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period/commentary. Br J Sports Med 37(1):6

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Vermani E, Mittal R, Weeks A (2010) Pelvic girdle pain and low back pain in pregnancy: a review. Pain Pract 10(1):60–71

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Bastiaanssen JM et al (2005) A historical perspective on pregnancy-related low back and/or pelvic girdle pain. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 120(1):3–14

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Biering K et al (2011) Pregnancy-related pelvic pain is more frequent in women with increased body mass index. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90(10):1132–1139

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Sherwood OD (2004) Relaxin’s physiological roles and other diverse actions. Endocr Rev 25(2):205–234

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Support was provided by the University of Otago (PhD Scholarship). The authors would like to thank Judy Fischer (Faculty Librarian) in assisting with the electronic search strategy for this study.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Aldabe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aldabe, D., Ribeiro, D.C., Milosavljevic, S. et al. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain and its relationship with relaxin levels during pregnancy: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 21, 1769–1776 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2162-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain
  • Relaxin
  • Low back pain
  • Pregnancy
  • Systematic review