Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Knowledge transfer of spinal manipulation skills by student-teachers: a randomised controlled trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the use of peer-assisted learning (PAL) of complex manipulative motor skills with respect to gender in medical students.

Methods

In 2007–2010, 292 students in their 3rd and 4th years of medical school were randomly assigned to two groups [Staff group (SG), PAL group (PG)] led by either staff tutors or student-teachers (ST). The students were taught bimanual practical and diagnostic skills (course education module of eight separate lessons) as well as a general introduction to the theory of spinal manipulative therapy. In addition to qualitative data collection (Likert scale), evaluation was performed using a multiple-choice questionnaire in addition to an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE).

Results

Complex motor skills as well as palpatory diagnostic competencies could in fact be better taught through professionals than through ST (manipulative OSCE grades/diagnostic OSCE score; SG vs. PG; male: P = 0.017/P < 0.001, female: P < 0.001/P < 0.001). The registration of theoretical knowledge showed equal results in students taught by staff or ST. In both teaching groups (SG: n = 147, PG: n = 145), no significant differences were observed between male and female students in matters of manipulative skills or theoretical knowledge. Diagnostic competencies were better in females than in males in the staff group (P = 0.041) Overall, students were more satisfied with the environment provided by professional teachers than by ST, though male students regarded the PAL system more suspiciously than their female counterparts.

Conclusions

The peer-assisted learning system does not seem to be generally qualified to transfer such complex spatiotemporal demands as spinal manipulative procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perkins GD, Hulme J, Bion JF (2002) Peer-led resuscitation training for healthcare students: a randomised controlled study. Intensive Care Med 28(6):698–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Field M, Burke JM, McAllister D, Lloyd DM (2007) Peer-assisted learning: a novel approach to clinical skills learning for medical students. Med Educ 41(4):411–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tolsgaard MG, Gustafsson A, Rasmussen MB, Høiby P, Müller CG, Ringsted C (2007) Student teachers can be as good as associate professors in teaching clinical skills. Med Teach 29(6):553–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weyrich P, Celebi N, Schrauth M, Möltner A, Lammerding-Köppel M, Nikendei C (2009) Peer-assisted versus faculty staff-led skills laboratory training: a randomised controlled trial. Med Educ 43(2):113–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burke J, Fayaz S, Graham K, Matthew R, Field M (2007) Peer-assisted learning in the acquisition of clinical skills: a supplementary approach to musculoskeletal system training. Med Teach 29(6):577–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Knobe M, Münker R, Sellei RM, Holschen M, Mooij SC, Schmidt-Rohlfing B, Niethard FU, Pape HC (2010) Peer teaching: a randomised controlled trial using student-teachers to teach musculoskeletal ultrasound. Med Educ 44(2):148–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Triano JJ, Scaringe J, Bougie J, Rogers C (2006) Effects of visual feedback on manipulation performance and patient ratings. J Manip Physiol Ther 29(5):378–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Peterson DH, Bergmann TF (2002) Chiropractic technique, 2nd edn. Mosby, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  9. Herzog W (2000) The mechanics of spinal manipulation. In: Herzog W (ed) Clinical biomechanics of spinal manipulation. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 92–190

    Google Scholar 

  10. Descarreaux M, Dugas C (2010) Learning spinal manipulation skills: assessment of biomechanical parameters in a 5 year longitudinal study. J Manip Physiol Ther 33(3):226–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McLeod PJ, Steinert Y, Meagher T, Schuwirth L, Tabatabai D, McLeod AH (2006) The acquisition of tacit knowledge in medical education: learning by doing. Med Educ 40(2):146–149

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Blanch DC, Hall JA, Roter DL, Frankel RM (2008) Medical student gender and issues of confidence. Patient Educ Couns 72(3):374–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferguson E, James D, Madeley L (2002) Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature. BMJ 324(7343):952–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Haq I, Higham J, Morris R, Dacre J (2005) Effect of ethnicity and gender on performance in undergraduate medical examinations. Med Educ 39(11):1126–1128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Haist SA, Witzke DB, Quinlivan S, Murphy-Spencer A, Wilson JF (2003) Clinical skills as demonstrated by a comprehensive clinical performance examination: who performs better—men or women? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 8(3):189–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L (2006) Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA 296(9):1094–1102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Heimann D, Lawall J (2001) Leitfaden Manuelle Therapie. Urban & Fischer Verlag, München, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bischoff HP, Moll H (2007) Kurz gefasstes Lehrbuch der Manuellen Medizin. Spitta-Verlag, Balingen

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pasquinelli LM, Greenberg LW (2008) A review of medical school programs that train medical students as teachers (MED-SATS). Teach Learn Med 20(1):73–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Andreatta PB, Hillard ML, Murphy MA, Gruppen LD, Mullan PB (2009) Short-term outcomes and long-term impact of a programme in medical education for medical students. Med Educ 43(3):260–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wulf G, McNevin NH, Fuchs T, Ritter F, Toole T (2000) Attentional focus in complex skill learning. Res Q Exerc Sport 71(3):229–239

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rogers DA, Regehr G, Gelula M, Yeh KA, Howdieshell TR, Webb W (2000) Peer teaching and computer-assisted learning: an effective combination for surgical skill training? J Surg Res 92(1):53–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Day CS, Yeh AC, Franko O, Ramirez M, Krupat E (2007) Musculoskeletal medicine: an assessment of the attitudes and knowledge of medical students at Harvard Medical School. Acad Med 82(5):452–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Descarreaux M, Dugas C, Lalanne K, Vincelette M, Normand MC (2006) Learning spinal manipulation: the importance of augmented feedback relating to various kinetic parameters. Spine J 6(2):138–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kilduski NC, Rice MS (2003) Qualitative and quantitative knowledge of results: effects on motor learning. Am J Occup Ther 57(3):329–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kelly S, Dennick R (2009) Evidence of gender bias in True-False Abstain medical examinations. BMC Med Educ 9:32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kolozsvari NO, Andalib A, Kaneva P, Cao J, Vassiliou MC, Fried GM, Feldman LS (2010) Sex is not everything: the role of gender in early performance of a fundamental laparoscopic skill. Surg Endosc Aug 24, Epub ahead of print

  28. Hudson NJ, Tonkin AL (2008) Clinical skills education: outcomes of relationships between junior medical students, senior peers and simulated patients. Med Educ 42(9):901–908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Weidner TG, Popp JK (2007) Peer-assisted learning and orthopaedic evaluation psychomotor skills. J Athl Train 42(1):113–119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Snodgrass SJ, Rivett DA, Robertson VJ, Stojanovski E (2010) Cervical spine mobilisation forces applied by physiotherapy students. Physiotherapy 96(2):120–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all the students who participated. Without their enthusiasm and willingness, this project would not have been possible.

Conflict of interest

None to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany

    Matthias Knobe, Malte Holschen, Saskia Catharina Mooij, Richard Martin Sellei, Pia Antony, Roman Pfeifer, Wolf Drescher & Hans-Christoph Pape

  2. Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Bethlehem Hospital Stolberg, Stolberg, Germany

    Ralf Münker

Authors
  1. Matthias Knobe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Malte Holschen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Saskia Catharina Mooij
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Richard Martin Sellei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ralf Münker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Pia Antony
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Roman Pfeifer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wolf Drescher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hans-Christoph Pape
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Knobe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knobe, M., Holschen, M., Mooij, S.C. et al. Knowledge transfer of spinal manipulation skills by student-teachers: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine J 21, 992–998 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2140-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2140-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation