Skip to main content


Log in

Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment in chronic low back pain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript



The differences in sagittal spino-pelvic alignment between adults with chronic low back pain (LBP) and the normal population are still poorly understood. In particular, it is still unknown if particular patterns of sagittal spino-pelvic alignment are more prevalent in chronic LBP. The current study helps to better understand the relationship between sagittal alignment and low back pain.

Materials and methods

To compare the sagittal spino-pelvic alignment of patients with chronic LBP with a cohort of asymptomatic adults. Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment was evaluated in prospective cohorts of 198 patients with chronic LBP and 709 normal subjects. The two cohorts were compared with respect to the sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), lumbar tilt (LT), lordotic levels, thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracic tilt (TT), kyphotic levels, and lumbosacral joint angle (LSA). Correlations between parameters were also assessed.


Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment is significantly different in chronic LBP with respect to SS, PI, LT, lordotic levels, TK, TT and LSA, but not PT, LL, and kyphotic levels. Correlations between parameters were similar for the two cohorts. As compared to normal adults, a greater proportion of patients with LBP presented low SS and LL associated with a small PI, while a greater proportion of normal subjects presented normal or high SS associated with normal or high PI.


Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment was different between patients with chronic LBP and controls. In particular, there was a greater proportion of chronic LBP patients with low SS, low LL and small PI, suggesting the relationship between this specific pattern and the presence of chronic LBP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Bilateral independent Student t tests and chi-square tests were performed to compare means and proportions, respectively. Relationships between parameters were assessed using Pearson’s coefficients. A level of significance of 0.05 was used for all statistical analyses.


  1. Poiraudeau S, Lefèvre-Colau M-M, Fayad F et al (2004) Lombalgies. Encylc Med Chir 15-840-C-10:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berthonnaud É, Dimnet J, Roussouly P et al (2005) Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:40–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Janssen MMA, Drevelle X, Humbert L et al (2009) Differences in male and female spino-pelvic alignment in asymptomatic young adults. Spine 34:E826–E832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mac-Thiong J-M, Labelle H, Berthonnaud E et al (2007) Sagittal spinopelvic balance in normal children and adolescents. Eur Spine J 16:227–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E et al (2005) Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine 30:346–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L et al (2005) Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:260–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. During J, Goudfrooij H, Keessen W et al (1985) Toward standards for posture. Postural characteristics of the lower back system in normal and pathologic conditions. Spine 10:83–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gautier J, Morillon P, Marcelli C (1999) Does spinal morphology influence the occurrence of low back pain? A retrospective clinical, anthropometric, and radiological study. Rev Rhum [Engl Ed] 66:29–34

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jackson RP, McManus AC (1994) Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low-back pain matched for age, sex, and size. A prospective controlled clinical study. Spine 19:1611–1618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barrey C, Jund J, Noseda O et al (2007) Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J 16:1459–1467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rajnics P, Templier A, Skalli W et al (2002) The importance of spinopelvic parameters in patients with lumbar disc lesions. Int Orthop 26:104–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsuji T, Matsuyama Y, Sato K et al (2001) Epidemiology of low back pain in the elderly: correlation with lumbar lordosis. J Orthop Sci 6:307–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Christie HJ, Kumar S, Warren SA (1995) Postural aberrations in low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76:218–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tüzün Ç, Yorulmaz I, Cindas A et al (1999) Low back pain and posture. Clin Rheumatol 18:308–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Frymoyer JW, Newberg A, Pope MH et al (1984) Spine radiographs in patients with low-back pain An epidemiological study in men. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:1048–1055

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Korovessis P, Dimas A, Iliopoulos P et al (2002) Correlative analysis of lateral vertebra radiographic variables and medical outcomes study short-form health survey A comparative study in asymptomatic volunteers versus patients with low back pain. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:384–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. George SZ, Hicks GE, Nevitt MA et al (2003) The relationship between lumbar lordosis and radiologic variables and lumbar lordosis and clinical variables in elderly, African–American women. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:200–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jackson RP, Phipps T, Hales C et al (2003) Pelvic lordosis and alignment in spondylolisthesis. Spine; 28:151–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mac-Thiong J-M, Wang Z, de Guise JA et al (2008) Postural model of sagittal spino-pelvic balance and its relevance for lumbosacral developmental spondylolisthesis. Spine; 33:2316–2325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rajnics P, Templier A, Skalli W et al (2002) The association of sagittal spinal and pelvic parameters in asymptomatic persons and patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord 15:24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E et al (2006) Sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis in the presence of L5-S1 isthmic lysis and low-grade spondylolisthesis. Spine 31:2484–2490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Barrey C, Jund J, Perrin G et al (2007) Spinopelvic alignment of patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Neurosurgery 61:981–986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morel E, Ilharreborde B, Lenoir T et al (2005) Sagittal balance of the spine and degenerative spondylolisthesis [French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 91:615–626

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mac-Thiong J-M, Labelle H, Charlebois M et al (2003) Sagittal plane analysis of the spine and pelvis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis according to the coronal curve type. Spine 28:1404–1409

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Upasani V, Tis J, Bastrom T et al (2007) Analysis of sagittal alignment in thoracic and thoracolumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. How do these two curve types differ? Spine 32:1355–1359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2006) (2006) An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment following long adult lumbar instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: can we predict ideal lumbar lordosis ? Spine 31:2343–2352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rose PS, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG et al (2009) Role of pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, and patient factors on sagittal plane correction following pedicle substraction osteotomy. Spine 34:785–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest


Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuelle Chaléat-Valayer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaléat-Valayer, E., Mac-Thiong, JM., Paquet, J. et al. Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment in chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 20 (Suppl 5), 634 (2011).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: