Abstract
In case of revision or minimal invasive spinal surgery, the amount of autograft possibly harvested from the lamina and the spinous processes is limited. Ekanayake and Shad (Acta Neurochir 152:651–653, 2010) suggest the application of bone shavings harvested via high speed burr additionally or instead, but so far no data regarding their osteogenic potential exist. Aim of the study was to compare the osteogenic potential of bone chips and high speed burr shavings, and to evaluate the applicability of bone shavings as an autograft for spinal fusion. Bone chips and shavings from 14 patients undergoing spinal decompression surgery were analyzed using in vitro tissue culture methods. Osteoblast emigration and proliferation, viability and mineralization were investigated and histological evaluation was performed. Bone chips from all patients showed successful osteoblast emigration after average 5.5 days. In contrast, only 57% of the corresponding bone shavings successfully demonstrated osteoblast emigration within an average time span of 14.8 days. Average osteoblast mobilisation was 1.25 × 106 cells per gram from bone chips and 1.73 × 105 cells per gram from the corresponding bone shavings. No difference was observed regarding cell viability, but population doubling times of bone chip cultures were significantly lower (50.5 vs. 121 h) and mineralization was observed in osteoblasts derived from bone chips only. Although some authors suggest the general applicability of laminectomy bone shavings as autografts for spinal fusion, autologous bone grafts obtained from laminectomy bone chips are superior in terms of cell delivery, cell proliferation and mineralization.
References
Wang H, Boyapathi L (2006) PASS principles for predictable bone regeneration. Implant Dent 15(1):8–17
Ekanayake E, Shad A (2010) Use of the novel ANSPACH bone collector for bone autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and cage fusion. Acta Neurochir 152:651–653
Sasso RC, LeHuec JC, Shaffrey C. (2005) Iliac crest bone graft donor site pain after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective patient satisfaction outcome assessment. J spinal Dis Tech 18: S77–S778
Chien-Lung C, Chien-Lin L, Shih-Sheng S et al. (2006) Posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion with autogenous bone chips from laminectomy extended with OsteoSet®. J Chin Med Assoc 69(12):581–584
Agarwal R, Williams K, Umscheid CA et al. (2009) Osteoinductive bone graft substitutes for lumbar fusion: a systematic review. J. Neurosurg Spine (6):729–740
Patel V, Estes S, Naar E et al. (2009) Histologic evaluation of high speed burr shavings collected during spinal decompression surgery. Orthopedics 32(1):23
Romeis B, Boeck P (1989) Mikroskopische Technik. 17.Auflage. Urban and Schwarzenberg. Muenchen/Wien/Baltimore
Alizarin Red S Staining Protocol for Calcium. http://www.ihcworld.com/_protocols/special_stains/alizarin_red_s.htm. (Accessed 3 March 2011)
Li S, Chien S, Branemark PI (1999) Heat shock-induced necrosis and apoptosis in osteoblasts. J Orthop Res 17(6):891–899
Millett P, Allen M, Rushton N (1995) Synthetic function and regulation of osteoblasts: current knowledge and applications. McGill J Med 1:138–146
Banwart JC, Asher MA, Hassanein RS (1995) Iliac crest bone graft harvest site donor site morbidity. A statistical evaluation. Spine 20(9):1055–1060
Sawin PD, Traynelis VC, Menezes AH (1998) A comparative analysis of fusion rates and donor-site morbidity for autogeneic rib and iliac crest bone grafts in posterior cervical fusions. J Neurosurg 88(2):255–265
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eder, C., Chavanne, A., Meissner, J. et al. Autografts for spinal fusion: osteogenic potential of laminectomy bone chips and bone shavings collected via high speed drill. Eur Spine J 20, 1791–1795 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1736-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1736-3