Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Vertebroplasty: benefits are more than risks in selected and evidence-based informed patients. A retrospective study of 59 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vertebral compression fractures represent a frequent pathology among elderly population, with potentially devastating consequences. More than 20 years have passed since percutaneous vertebroplasty was initially used in the treatment of angiomas, representing nowadays a widely used treatment for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The authors present a retrospective review of 59 consecutive patients (in total 94 fractured levels) that underwent polymethylmethacrylate percutaneous vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures due to senile or secondary osteoporosis. All fractures were free from neurologic involvement and were classified as A1 type according to Magerl classification. All of patients were initially treated conservatively, by application of orthosis that allows immediate deambulation. At control, patients who complained of pain and limitation of daily activities underwent MRI. If presence of marrow signal changes, especially hypertense signal in T2-weighted images was confirmed, percutaneous vertebroplasty procedure was performed (we could call it “sub-acute” procedure). A limited group of patients that did not tolerate brace and had an insufficient pain control underwent vertebroplasty “in acute”, few days after fracture. Immediate post-operative pain reduction and follow-up clinical outcome (estimating quality of life and residual back pain) were evaluated by means of Visual Analogue Scale, SF-36 and Oswestry Disability Index. In the immediate post-operative course a significant pain relief was found in 39 patients (66.1%), moderate pain relief in 17 (28.8%), while 3 (5.1%) did not achieve relevant pain improvement. Pain intensity and life quality was maintained within satisfactory limits after a mean follow-up of 16 months. In conclusion, percutaneous vertebroplasty is an effective and safe procedure for treating vertebral compression fractures in the elderly. It provides immediate pain relief and allows early mobilization, thus avoiding potentially severe complications related to persistent back pain and prolonged bed rest. When performed by experienced surgeon complication rate is low, representing a safe procedure, able to provide a satisfactory outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alvarez L, Alcaraz M, Perez-Higueras A, Granizo JJ, de Miguel I, Rossi RE, Quinones D (2006) Percutaneous vertebroplasty. Functional improvement in patients with osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine 31(10):1113–1118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van der Klift M, De Laet CE, McCloskey EV, Hofman A, Pols HA (2002) The incidence of vertebral fractures in men and women: the Rotterdam Study. J Bone Miner Res 17:1051–1056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Finnern HW, Sykes DP (2003) The hospital costs of vertebral fractures in the EU. Osteoporos Int 14:429–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Riggs BL, Melton LJ (1995) The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insight afforded by epidemiology. Bone Suppl 5:S505–S511

    Google Scholar 

  5. Riggs BL, Melton LJ (1986) Involutional osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 314(26):1676–1685

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen LD (1990) Fractures of the osteoporotic spine. Orthop Clin N Am 21(1):143–150

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Phillips FM (2003) Minimally invasive treatments of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine 28(15S):S45–S53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Silverman SL (1992) The clinical consequences of vertebral compression fracture. Bone 13(Suppl 2):S27–S31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shen WJ, Shen YS (1999) Nonsurgical treatment of three-column thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic deficit. Spine 24:412–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lau E, Ong K, Kurtz S, Schmier J, Edidin A (2008) Mortality following the diagnosis of a vertebral compression fracture in the medicare population. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90:1479–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kado DM, Browner WS, Palermo L, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Cummings SR (1999) Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arch Intern Med 159:1215–1220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Center JR, Nguyen TV, Schneider D, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA (1999) Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study. Lancet 353:878–882

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Odén A, Sernbo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Petterson C, De Laet C, Jönsson B (2004) Mortality after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 15:38–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Been HD, Poolman RW, Ubags LH (2004) Clinical outcome and radiographic results after surgical treatment of post/traumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis following simple type A fractures. Eur Spine J 13:101–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Magerl F et al (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3:184–201

    Google Scholar 

  16. Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, Le Gars D (1987) Note préliminaire sur le traitement des angiomes vertébraux par vertébroplastie percutanée. Neurochirurgie 33:166–168

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Diamond TH, Champion B, Clark WA (2003) Management of acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a nonrandomized trial comparing percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy. Am J Med 114:257–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Heini PF, Walchli B, Berlemann U (2000) Percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty with PMMA: operative technique and early results. A prospective study for the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures. Eur Spine J 9:445–450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kobayashi K, Shimoyama K, Nakamura K, Murata K (2005) Percutaneous vertebroplasty immediately relieves pain of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and prevents prolonged immobilization of patients. Eur Radiol 15:360–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liliang PC, Su TM, Liang CL, Chen HJ, Tsai YD, Lu K (2005) Percutaneous vertebroplasty improves pain and physical functioning in elderly osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture patients. Gerontology 51:34–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McKiernan F, Faciszewski T, Jensen R (2004) Quality of life following vertebroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 86-A:2600–2606

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barr JD, Barr MS, Lemley TJ, McCann RM (2000) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization. Spine 25:923–928

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Perez-Higueras A, Alvarez L, Rossi R, Quinones D, Al-Assir I (2002) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: long term clinical and radiological outcome. Neuroradiology 44:950–954

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tohmeh AG, Mathis JM, Fenton DC, Levine AM, Belkoff SM (1999) Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of vertebral osteoporotic fractures. Spine 24:1772–1776

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Berlemann U, Ferguson SJ, Nolte LP, Heini PF (2002) Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty. A biomechanical investigation. J Bone Jt Surg Br 84-B:748–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Buchbinder R; Osborne RH, Ebeling PR, Wark JD, Mitchell P, Wriedt C, Graves S, Staples MP, Murphy B (2009) A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. New Engl J Med 361(6):557–568

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kallmes DF, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ, Turner JA, Wilson DJ, Diamond TH, Edwards R, Gray LA, Stout L, Owen S, Hollingworth W, Ghdoke B, Annesley-Williams DJ, Ralston SH, Jarvik JG (2009) A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med 361(6):569–579

    Google Scholar 

  28. Klazen CA, Verhaar HJ, Lampmann LE, Juttmann JR, Blonk MC, Jansen FH, Tielbeek AV, Schoemaker MC, Buskens E, van der Graaf Y, Janssens X, Fransen H, van Everdingen KJ, Muller AF, Mali WP, Lohle PN (2007) VERTOS II: percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patients with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials 8:33

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jarvik JG, Hollingworth W (2007) VERTOS: a step in the right direction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28(3):561–562

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wardlaw D, Cummings SR, Van Meirhaeghe J, Bastian L, Tillman JB, Ranstam J, Eastell R, Shabe P, Talmadge K, Boonen S (2009) Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 373(9668):1016–1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oncological and Degenerative Spine Surgery, Rizzoli Institute, via Pupilli 1, 40136, Bologna, Italy

    Giovanni Barbanti Brodano, Luca Amendola, Luca Boriani, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Stefano Bandiera, Silvia Terzi & Stefano Boriani

  2. Department of Spinal Deformities Surgery, Rizzoli Institute, Bologna, Italy

    Konstantinos Martikos & Tiziana Greggi

  3. Department of Pediatric Orthopedics and Traumatology, Rizzoli Institute, Bologna, Italy

    Camilla Bettuzzi

Authors
  1. Giovanni Barbanti Brodano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luca Amendola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Konstantinos Martikos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Camilla Bettuzzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Luca Boriani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alessandro Gasbarrini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Stefano Bandiera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Silvia Terzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Tiziana Greggi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Stefano Boriani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Amendola.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brodano, G.B., Amendola, L., Martikos, K. et al. Vertebroplasty: benefits are more than risks in selected and evidence-based informed patients. A retrospective study of 59 cases. Eur Spine J 20, 1265–1271 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1705-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1705-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation