Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The flow patterns of caudal epidural in upper lumbar spinal pathology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Epidural steroid injections are an important therapeutic modality employed by spinal surgeons in the treatment of patients with chronic low back pain with or without lumbar radiculopathy. The caudal epidural is a commonly used and well-established technique; however, little is known about the segmental level of pathology that may be addressed by this intervention. This prospective study of over 50 patients aimed to examine the spreading pattern of this technique using epidurography. The effect of variation in Trendelenburg tilt and the eradication of lumbar lordosis on the cephalic distribution of the injectate were investigated. 52 patients with low back pain and radiculopathy underwent caudal epidural. All had 20 ml volume injected, comprised of 5 ml contrast (Ultravist™ Schering) 2 ml Triamcinolone (Adcortyl™ Squibb) and 13 ml local anaesthetic (1% lignocaine). Patients were randomised to either 0° or 30° of Trendelenburg tilt, as referenced from the lumbar spine. Patients were further randomised to presence or absence of lumbar lordosis, which was eradicated using a flexion device placed beneath the prone patient. A lateral image of each sacrum was obtained, to identify variations in sacral geometry particularly resistant to cephalic spread of injectate. The highest segment reached on fluoroscopy was recorded post injection. Fifty-two patients with a mean age of 50 years underwent caudal epidural. Thirty-one were in 0° head tilt, with 21 in 30° of head tilt. In each of these groups, 50% had their lumbar lordosis flattened prior to caudal injection. The median segmental level reached was L3, with a range from T9 to L5. Eradication of lumbar lordosis did not significantly alter cephalic spread of injectate. There was a trend for 30° tilt to extend the upper level reached by caudal injection (p = 0.08). There were no adverse events in this series. Caudal epidural is a reliable and relatively safe procedure for the treatment of low back pain. Pathology at L3/4 and L4/5 and L5/S1 can be approached by this technique. Although in selected cases thoracic and high lumbar levels can be reached, this is variable. If pathology at levels above L3 needs to be addressed, we propose a 30° head tilt may improve cephalic drug delivery. The caudal route is best reserved for pathology below L3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. White AH (1983) Injection techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am 14:553–567

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Evans W (1930) Intrasacral epidural injection in the treatment of sciatica. Lancet 2:1225–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dilke TF, Burry HC, Grahame R (1973) Extradural corticosteroid injection in the management of lumbar nerve root compression. BMJ 2:635–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Watts RW, Silagy CA (1995) A meta-analysis of the efficacy of epidural corticosteroids in the treatment of sciatica. Anaesth Intensive Care 23:564–569

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bowman SJ, Wedderburn L, Whaley A, Grahame R, Newman S (1993) Outcome assessment after epidural corticosteroid injection for low back pain and sciatica. Spine 18(10):1345–1350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cyriax J (1982) Epidural local anaesthesia. In: Textbook of orthopaedic medicine, vol 1, 8th edn. Harcourt publishers, New York, pp 310–327

  7. Kim KM, Kim HS, Chow KH, Ahn WS (2001) Cephalic spreading levels after volumetric caudal epidural injections in chronic low back pain. J Korean Med Sci 16:193–197

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sekiguchi M, Yabuki S, Satoh K, Kikuchi S (2004) An anatomic study of the sacral hiatus: a basis for successful caudal epidural block. Clin J Pain 20(1):51–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bryce-Smith R (1954) The spread of solutions in the extradural space. Anaesthesia 9:201–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bogduk N (1995) Spine update: epidural steroids. Spine 20:845–848

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McGregor AH, Anjarwalla NK, Stambach T (2001) Does the method of injection alter the outcome of epidural injections? J Spinal Disorders 14(6):507–510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Breivik H, Hesla PE, Molnar I, Lind B (1976) Treatment of chronic low back pain and sciatica. Comparison of caudal epidural injections of bupivacaine and methylprednisolone with bupivacaine followed by saline. In: Bonica JJ, Albe-Fessard D (eds) Advances in pain research and therapy. Raven Press, New York, pp 927–932

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bush K, Hillier S (1991) A controlled study of caudal epidural injections of triamcinolone plus procaine for the management of intractable sciatica. Spine 16:572–575

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sayegh FE, Kenanidis EL, Papavasiliou KA, Potoupnis ME, Kirkos JM, Kepetanos GA (2009) Efficacy of steroid and nonsteroid caudal epidural injections for low back pain and sciatica: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Spine 15 34(14):1441–1447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Conn A, Buenaventura RM, Datta S, Abdi S, Diwan S (2009) Systematic review of caudal epidural injections in the management of chronic low back pain. Pain Physician 12(1):109–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cuckler JM, Bernini PA, Wiesel SW, Booth RE, Rothman RH, Pickens GT (1985) The use of epidural steroids in the treatment of radicular pain. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 67:63–66

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Young IA, Hyman GS, Packia-Raj LN, Cole AJ (2007) The use of lumbar epidural/transforaminal steroids for managing spinal disease. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15(4):228–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grundy EM, Rammurthy S, Patel KP, Mani M, Winnie AP (1978) Extradural analgesia revisited. A statistical study. Br J Anaesth 50:805–809

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Carette S et al (1997) Epidural corticosteroid injections for sciatica due to herniated nucleus pulposus. N Engl J Med 5 336(23):1634–1640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Cleary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cleary, M., Keating, C. & Poynton, A.R. The flow patterns of caudal epidural in upper lumbar spinal pathology. Eur Spine J 20, 804–807 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1613-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1613-5

Keywords

Navigation