Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of radiographic and computed tomographic measurement of pedicle and vertebral body dimensions in Koreans: the ratio of pedicle transverse diameter to vertebral body transverse diameter

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the characteristics of pedicle transverse diameters (PD), vertebral body transverse diameters (VBD), especially the ratios of PD/VBD (CT ratio), which has never been discussed, in Koreans using computed tomography (CT) scans and to evaluate the possibility of obtaining more accurate estimations of PD from plain radiographs using the CT ratios in each spine level. The T1–L5 vertebrae of 50 participants were analyzed prospectively with CT scans (CT-VBD and CT-PD), and the T9–L5 vertebrae of the same participants were investigated with plain radiographs (X-VBD and X-PD). The CT ratio had a higher correlation with the CT-PD (r 2 = 0.630) from T1 to L5, especially in the lower thoracic and lumbar spine (T9–L5, r 2 = 0.737). The correlation of VBDs between the two radiologic tools (r 2 = 0.896) was higher than that of the PDs (r 2 = 0.665). Based on the data, equations for the estimation of a more accurate PD from plain radiographs were developed as follows: estimated PD = estimated VBD × [1.014 × (X-VBD) + 0.152] × the mean CT ratio at each spinal level. The correlation between the estimated PD and the CT-PD (r 2 = 0.852) was improved compared with that (r 2 = 0.665) between the X-PD and the CT-PD. In conclusion, the CT ratio showed a very similar changing trends to CT-PD from T1 to L5 regardless of sex and body mass, and the measurement error of PD from only plain radiographs could be minimized using estimated VBD and the mean CT ratio at each spinal level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. King D (1948) Internal fixation for lumbosacral fusion. J Bone Joint Surg 30A:560–565

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Krag MH, Weaver DL, Beynnon BD, Haugh LD (1988) Morphometry of the thoracic and lumbar spine related to transpedicular screw placement for surgical spinal fixation. Spine 13:27–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Misenhimer GR, Peek RD, Wiltse LL, Rothman SL, Widell EH Jr (1989) Anatomic analysis of pedicle cortical and cancellous diameter as related to screw size. Spine 14:367–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Olsewski JM, Simmons EH, Kallen FC, Mendel FC, Severin CM, Berens DL (1990) Morphometry of the lumbar spine: anatomical perspectives related to transpedicular fixation. J Bone Joint Surg 72:541–549

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yahiro MA (1994) Comprehensive literature review. Pedicle screw fixation devices. Spine 19:2274S–2278S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernard TN Jr, Seibert CE (1992) Pedicle diameter determined by computed tomography. Its relevance to pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine. Spine 17:S160–S163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berry JL, Moran JM, Berg WS, Steffee AD (1987) A morphometric study of human lumbar and selected thoracic vertebrae. Spine 12:362–367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheung KM, Ruan D, Chan FL, Fang D (1994) Computed tomographic osteometry of Asian lumbar pedicles. Spine 19:1495–1498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hou S, Hu R, Shi Y (1993) Pedicle morphology of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine in a Chinese population. Spine 18:1850–1855

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Marchesi D, Schneider E, Glauser P, Aebi M (1988) Morphometric analysis of the thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicles, anatomo-radiologic study. Surg Radiol Anat 10:317–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Panjabi MM, Goel V, Oxland T, Takata K, Duranceau J, Krag M, Price M (1992) Human lumbar vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 17:299–306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Robertson PA, Stewart NR (2000) The radiologic anatomy of the lumbar and lumbosacral pedicles. Spine 25:709–715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doornik A, Widell EH, Knight GW, Patwardhan AG, Thomas JC, Rothman SL, Fields BT (1987) Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine 12:160–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chadha M, Balain B, Maini L, Dhaon BK (2003) Pedicle morphology of the lower thoracic, lumbar, and S1 vertebrae: an Indian perspective. Spine 28:744–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Krag MH, Beynnon BD, Pope MH, Frymoyer JW, Haugh LD, Weaver DL (1986) An internal fixator for posterior application to short segments of the thoracic, lumbar, or lumbosacral spine. Design and testing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 203:75–98

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Widell EH, Thomas JC, Holland WR, Field BT, Spencer CW (1986) A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 203:99–112

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kim NH, Lee HM, Chung IH, Kim HJ, Kim SJ (1994) Morphometric study of the pedicles of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in Koreans. Spine 19:1390–1394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McLain RF, Ferrara L, Kabins M (2002) Pedicle morphometry in the upper thoracic spine: limits to safe screw placement in older patients. Spine 27:2467–2471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Datir SP, Mitra SR (2004) Morphometric study of the thoracic vertebral pedicle in an Indian population. Spine 29:1174–1181

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mitra SR, Datir SP, Jadhav SO (2002) Morphometric study of the lumbar pedicle in the Indian population as related to pedicular screw fixation. Spine 27:453–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van Schaik JJ, Verbiest H, van Schaik FD (1985) Morphometry of lower lumbar vertebrae as seen on CT scans: newly recognized characteristics. AJR 145:327–335

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ursu TR, Porter RW, Navaratnam V (1996) Development of the lumbar and sacral vertebral canal in utero. Spine 21:2705–2708

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Chung-Ang University Research Grants in 2010.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwang-Sup Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kang, K.S., Song, KS., Lee, J.S. et al. Comparison of radiographic and computed tomographic measurement of pedicle and vertebral body dimensions in Koreans: the ratio of pedicle transverse diameter to vertebral body transverse diameter. Eur Spine J 20, 414–421 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1560-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1560-1

Keywords

Navigation