Skip to main content
Log in

PEEK cages as a potential alternative in the treatment of cervical spondylodiscitis: a preliminary report on a patient series

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The surgical management of cervical spondylodiscitis consists of the resection of the affected disc, the decompression of the cervical spinal cord, followed by the stabilization using an autologous bone graft or a titanium implant combined with a ventral plate fixation. Until now, there were no studies about the practicability and putative safety of PEEK cages in cervical spine infection. Now, we present the history of five patients suffering from neurological deficits and septicemia caused by mono- or bisegmental pyogenic cervical discitis and intraspinal abscess without severe bone destruction. Patients were treated surgically by discectomy, decompression, and ventral spondylodesis. The disc was replaced by a PEEK cage without additional fixation. Progressive bony fusion and complete regression of the inflammatory changes was demonstrated 7–8 months later by a computer assisted tomography and contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, respectively. The vertebral alignment changed minimally; the cages developed only a slight average subsidence. The clinical symptoms improved in all patients significantly. Neck pain or instability was never observed. Nevertheless, prospective investigations of a larger patient series are mandatory. We suppose that the use of PEEK cages represents a potential and safe alternative in the treatment of cervical spondylodiscitis in selected patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heyde CE, Boehm H, El Saghir H, Tschöke SK, Kayser R (2006) Surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis in the cervical spine: a minimum 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 15(9):1380–1387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Karadimas EJ, Bunger C, Lindblad BE, Hansen ES, Høy K, Helmig P, Kannerup AS, Niedermann B (2008) Spondylodiscitis. A retrospective study of 163 patients. Acta Orthop 79(5):650–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Frangen TM, Kälicke T, Gottwald M, Andereya S, Andress HJ, Russe OJ, Müller EJ, Muhr G, Schinkel C (2006) Surgical management of spondylodiscitis. An analysis of 78 cases. Unfallchirurg 109(9):743–753

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Korovessis P, Petsinis G, Koureas G, Iliopoulos P, Zacharatos S (2006) Anterior surgery with insertion of titanium mesh cage and posterior instrumented fusion performed sequentially on the same day under one anesthesia for septic spondylitis of thoracolumbar spine: is the use of titanium mesh cages safe? Spine 31(9):1014–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Green S, Schlegel J (2001) Polymers for the medical industry. In: Conference Proceedings, Paper 2

  6. Cloward RB (1958) The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg 15(6):602–617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sasso RC, LeHuec JC, Shaffrey C, Spine Interbody Research Group (2005) Iliac crest bone graft donor site pain after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective patient satisfaction outcome assessment. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(Suppl):S77–S81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Bell RS, Moquin RR, Rosner MK (2006) Single-stage treatment of pyogenic spinal infection with titanium mesh cages. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(5):376–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Korovessis P, Repantis T, Iliopoulos P, Hadjipavlou A (2008) Beneficial influence of titanium mesh cage on infection healing and spinal reconstruction in hematogenous septic spondylitis: a retrospective analysis of surgical outcome of twenty-five consecutive cases and review of literature. Spine 33(21):E759–E767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurtz SM, Devine JN (2007) PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 28(32):4845–4869

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pee YH, Park JD, Choi YG, Lee SH (2008) Anterior debridement and fusion followed by posterior pedicle screw fixation in pyogenic spondylodiscitis: autologous iliac bone strut versus cage. J Neurosurg Spine 8(5):405–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen Y, Chen D, Guo Y, Wang X, Lu X, He Z, Yuan W (2008) Subsidence of titanium mesh cage: a study based on 300 cases. J Spinal Disord Tech 21(7):489–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chou YC, Chen DC, Hsieh WA, Chen WF, Yen PS, Harnod T, Chiou TL, Chang YL, Su CF, Lin SZ, Chen SY (2008) Efficacy of anterior cervical fusion: comparison of titanium cages, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages and autogenous bone grafts. J Clin Neurosci 15(11):1240–1245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hauerberg J, Kosteljanetz M, Bøge-Rasmussen T, Dons K, Gideon P, Springborg JB, Wagner A (2008) Anterior cervical discectomy with or without fusion with ray titanium cage: a prospective randomized clinical study. Spine 33(5):458–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Trust of Neurosurgical Research of the German Society of Neurosurgery to Jan Walter, Susanne A. Kuhn, and Rupert Reichart (2005, 2007, 2008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Ewald.

Additional information

J. Walter and S. A. Kuhn contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walter, J., Kuhn, S.A., Reichart, R. et al. PEEK cages as a potential alternative in the treatment of cervical spondylodiscitis: a preliminary report on a patient series. Eur Spine J 19, 1004–1009 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1265-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1265-5

Keywords

Navigation