European Spine Journal

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 633–640 | Cite as

Self-reported assessment of disability and performance-based assessment of disability are influenced by different patient characteristics in acute low back pain

  • Benedict Martin Wand
  • Lara A. Chiffelle
  • Neil Edward O’Connell
  • James Henry McAuley
  • Lorraine Hilary DeSouza
Original Article


For an individual, the functional consequences of an episode of low back pain is a key measure of their clinical status. Self-reported disability measures are commonly used to capture this component of the back pain experience. In non-acute low back pain there is some uncertainty of the validity of this approach. It appears that self-reported assessment of disability and direct measurements of functional status are only moderately related. In this cross-sectional study, we investigated this relationship in a sample of 94 acute low back pain patients. Both self-reported disability and a performance-based assessment of disability were assessed, along with extensive profiling of patient characteristics. Scale consistency of the performance-based assessment was investigated using Cronbach’s alpha, the relationship between self-reported and performance-based assessment of disability was investigated using Pearson’s correlation. The relationship between clinical profile and each of the disability measures were examined using Pearson’s correlations and multivariate linear regression. Our results demonstrate that the battery of tests used are internally reliable (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.86). We found only moderate correlations between the two disability measures (r = 0.471, p < 0.001). Self-reported disability was significantly correlated with symptom distribution, medication use, physical well-being, pain intensity, depression, somatic distress and anxiety. The only significant correlations with the performance-based measure were symptom distribution, physical well-being and pain intensity. In the multivariate analyses no psychological measure made a significant unique contribution to the prediction of the performance-based measure, whereas depression made a unique contribution to the prediction of the self-reported measure. Our results suggest that self-reported and performance-based assessments of disability are influenced by different patient characteristics. In particular, it appears self-reported measures of disability are more influenced by the patient’s psychological status than performance-based measures of disability.


Low back pain Disability Functional performance Validity Outcome 


  1. 1.
    Flores L, Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB (1997) Objectification of functional improvement after nonoperative care. Spine 22:1622–1633CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJH, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, Roland M, Von Korff M, Waddel G (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research: a proposal for standardized use. Spine 23:2003–2013CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bombardier C (2000) Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine 25:3100–3103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gatchel RJ, Turk DC (2008) Criticisms of the biopsychosocial model in spine care: creating and then attacking a straw person. Spine 33:2831–2836CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK (2004) Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain. Spine 29:E492–E501CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Verbunt JA, Westerterp KR, van der Heijden GJ, Seelen HA, Vlaeyen JW, Knottnerus JA (2001) Physical activity in daily life in patients with chronic low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82:726–730CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Verbunt JA, Sieben JM, Seelen HA, Vlaeyen JW, Bousema EJ, van der Heijden GJ, Knottnerus JA (2005) Decline in physical activity, disability and pain-related fear in sub-acute low back pain. Eur J Pain 9:417–425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Simmonds MJ, Olson SL, Jones S, Hussein T, Lee CE, Novy D, Radwan H (1998) Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of physical performance tests in patients with low back pain. Spine 23:2412–2421CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee CE, Simmonds MJ, Novy DM, Jones S (2001) Self-reports and clinician-measured physical function among patients with low back pain: a comparison. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82:227–231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cunha IT, Simmonds MJ, Protas EJ, Jones S (2002) Back pain, physical function, and estimates of aerobic capacity: what are the relationships among methods and measures? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 81:913–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Novy DM, Simmonds MJ, Lee CE (2002) Physical performance tasks: what are the underlying constructs? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:44–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reneman MF, Jorritsma W, Schellekens JMH, Goeken LNH (2002) Concurrent validity of questionnaire and performance-based disability measurements in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. J Occup Rehabil 12:119–129CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gross DP, Battie MC (2003) Construct validity of a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation administered within a worker’s compensation environment. J Occup Rehabil 13:287–295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brouwer S, Dijkstra PU, Stewart RE, Goeken LNH, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JHB (2005) Comparing self-report, clinical examination and functional testing in the assessment of work-related limitations in patients with chronic low back pain. Disabil Rehabil 27:999–1005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alschuler KN, Theisen-Goodvich ME, Haig AJ, Geisser ME (2008) A comparison of the relationship between depression, perceived disability, and physical performance in persons with chronic pain. Eur J Pain 12:757–764CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Waddell G (1987) 1987 Volvo award in clinical sciences. A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine 12:632–644CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vlaeyen JWS, Kole-Snijders AMJ, Rotteveel AM, Ruesink R, Heuts PHT (1995) The role of fear of movement/(re)injury in pain disability. J Occup Rehabil 5:235–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pincus T, Vogel S, Burton AK, Santos R, Field AP (2006) Fear avoidance and prognosis in back pain: a systematic review and synthesis of current evidence. Arthritis Rheum 54:3999–4010CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, Lynne D (1985) Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther 65:175–180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harding VR, Williams AC, Richardson PH, Nicholas MK, Jackson JL, Richardson IH, Pither CE (1994) The development of a battery of measures for assessing physical functioning of chronic pain patients. Pain 58:367–375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Taylor S, Frost H, Taylor A, Barker K (2001) Reliability and responsiveness of the shuttle walking test in patients with chronic low back pain. Physiother Res Int 6:170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Steffen TM, Hacker TA, Mollinger L (2002) Age- and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: six-minute walk test, Berg balance scale, timed up and go test, and gait speeds. Phys Ther 82:128–137PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schaubert K, Bohannon RW (2005) Reliability of the sit-to-stand test over dispersed test sessions. Isokinet Exerc Sci 13:119–122Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sherrington C, Lord SR (2005) Reliability of simple portable tests of physical performance in older people after hip fracture. Clin Rehabil 19:496–504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    van Hedel HJ, Wirz M, Dietz V (2005) Assessing walking ability in subjects with spinal cord injury: validity and reliability of 3 walking tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:190–196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wand BM, Bird C, McAuley JH, Dore CJ, MacDowell M, De Souza LH (2004) Early intervention for the management of acute low back pain: a single-blind randomized controlled trial of biopsychosocial education, manual therapy, and exercise. Spine 29:2350–2356CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Spitzer W, LeBlanc F, Dupuis M (1987) Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders. Spine 12:S1–S59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Spielberger C, Gorsuch R, Lushene R (1970) The state-trait anxiety inventory manual. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zung WW (1965) A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 12:63–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Main CJ (1983) The modified somatic perception questionnaire (MSPQ). J Psychosom Res 27:503–514CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 8:141–144CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Portney LG, Watkins MP (2000) Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Prentice Hall Health, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cohen JW (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ayre M, Tyson GA (2001) The role of self-efficacy and fear-avoidance beliefs in the prediction of disability. Aust Psychol 36:250–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Denison E, Asenlof P, Lindberg P (2004) Self-efficacy, fear avoidance, and pain intensity as predictors of disability in subacute and chronic musculoskeletal pain patients in primary health care. Pain 111:245–252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Reneman MF, Geertzen JHB, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S (2008) General and specific self-efficacy reports of patients with chronic low back pain: are they related to performances in a functional capacity evaluation? J Occup Rehabil 18:183–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Page SJ, Shawaryn MA, Cernich AN, Linacre JM (2002) Scaling of the revised Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:1579–1584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Garratt AM (2003) Rasch analysis of the Roland disability questionnaire. Spine 28:79–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kaplan GM, Wurtele SK, Gillis D (1996) Maximal effort during functional capacity evaluations: an examination of psychological factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77:161–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benedict Martin Wand
    • 1
  • Lara A. Chiffelle
    • 2
  • Neil Edward O’Connell
    • 3
  • James Henry McAuley
    • 4
  • Lorraine Hilary DeSouza
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Health SciencesThe University of Notre Dame AustraliaFremantleAustralia
  2. 2.Progress Physiotherapy ServicesCollieAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Health Sciences and Social CareBrunel UniversityUxbridgeUK
  4. 4.Musculoskeletal DivisionThe George Institute for International HealthSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations