Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is there a way to diagnose spinal instability in acute burst fractures by performing ultrasound?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the predictive value of ultrasound diagnostics for the assessment of traumatic lesions of the posterior ligament complex (PLC) in burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. This was a prospective validating cohort study. Judgment about instability and treatment of burst fractures depends on the condition of the PLC. There have been some studies describing underdiagnosis of PLC injuries due to classification problems in ligamentary distraction type fractures. The gold standard for assessing these lesions is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Even then, there are often limits in contemporary operational availability and technical limitations of MRI. Ultrasound was described being an alternative. In a prospective study, 54 levels of 18 patients with acute burst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine have been examined by ultrasound and additional MRI scans preoperatively. The condition (intact vs. ruptured) of supraspinous ligament (SSL) and the interspinous ligament has been assessed for the ligaments separately. Hematoma below the SSL has also been evaluated as an indirect sign of an injured PLC. In all the patients the primary performed operative treatment was a posterior spinal instrumentation. Postoperatively the blinded results of the ultrasound procedures have been matched against intraoperative and MRI findings. Assessments of all target structures have been contributed to the calculation of the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound. A total of 18 patients, 14 males and 4 females, with acute burst fractures have been qualified for inclusion in the study. The patients’ mean age was 43.4 years. Comparing intraoperative findings with preoperatively performed investigations, ultrasound archived a sensitivity of 0.99 and a specificity of 0.75 (P < 0.05) to detect traumatic lesions to the PLC. As hypothesized the obtained predictive value using ultrasound correlates closely with intraoperative findings. Anyway MRI still seems to be the superior diagnostic method for examining the PLC. However, ultrasound can be considered to be an adequate alternative method in cases with contraindications for MRI such as ferromagnetic side effects, claustrophobia, availability or emergency diagnostics in multiple injuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams MA (1995) Mechanical testing of the spine. An appraisal of methodology, results, and conclusions. Spine 20:2151–2156. doi:10.1097/00007632-199510000-00015

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. An HS, Vaccaro A, Cotler JM, Lin S (1991) Low lumbar burst fractures. Comparison among body cast, Harrington rod, Luque rod, and Steffee plate. Spine 16:S440–S444. doi:10.1097/00007632-199110001-00019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Been HD, Bouma GJ (1999) Comparison of two types of surgery for thoraco-lumbar burst fractures: combined anterior and posterior stabilisation vs. posterior instrumentation only. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 141:349–357. doi:10.1007/s007010050310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Benzel EC, Hart BL, Ball PA, Baldwin NG, Orrison WW, Espinosa MC (1996) Magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of patients with occult cervical spine injury. J Neurosurg 85:824–829

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brightman RP, Miller CA, Rea GL, Chakeres DW, Hunt WE (1992) Magnetic resonance imaging of trauma to the thoracic and lumbar spine. The importance of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 17:541–550. doi:10.1097/00007632-199205000-00011

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Denis F (1983) The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine 8:817–831. doi:10.1097/00007632-198311000-00003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fassett DR (2007) Classification systems for acute thoracolumbar trauma. Thoracolumbar spine. Curr Opin Orthop 18:253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gillespie KA, Dickey JP (2004) Biomechanical role of lumbar spine ligaments in flexion and extension: determination using a parallel linkage robot and a porcine model. Spine 29:1208–1216. doi:10.1097/00007632-200406010-00010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Haba H, Taneichi H, Kotani Y, Terae S, Abe S, Yoshikawa H, Abumi K, Minami A, Kaneda K (2003) Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for detecting posterior ligamentous complex injury associated with thoracic and lumbar fractures. J Neurosurg 99:20–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harris MB, Sethi RK (2006) The initial assessment and management of the multiple-trauma patient with an associated spine injury. Spine 31:S9–S15 (discussion S36). doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000217924.56853.0d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Harrop JS, Vaccaro AR, Hurlbert RJ, Wilsey JT, Baron EM, Shaffrey CI, Fisher CG, Dvorak MF, Oner FC, Wood KB, Anand N, Anderson DG, Lim MR, Lee JY, Bono CM, Arnold PM, Rampersaud YR, Fehlings MG (2006) Intrarater and interrater reliability and validity in the assessment of the mechanism of injury and integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex: a novel injury severity scoring system for thoracolumbar injuries. Invited submission from the joint section meeting on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves, March 2005. J Neurosurg Spine 4:118–122. doi:10.3171/spi.2006.4.2.118

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ho HS (2001) Safety of metallic implants in magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 14:472–477. doi:10.1002/jmri.1209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Holdsworth F (1970) Fractures, dislocations, and fracture-dislocations of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:1534–1551

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Holmes JF, Mirvis SE, Panacek EA, Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Velmahos GC (2002) Variability in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cervical spine injuries. J Trauma 53:524–529. doi:10.1097/00005373-200209000-00021 discussion 530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobs RR, Casey MP (1984) Surgical management of thoracolumbar spinal injuries. General principles and controversial considerations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 189:22–35

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kriek JJ, Govender S (2006) AO-classification of thoracic and lumbar fractures—reproducibility utilizing radiographs and clinical information. Eur Spine J 15:1239–1246. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0002-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee HM, Kim HS, Kim DJ, Suk KS, Park JO, Kim NH (2000) Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting posterior ligament complex injury in thoracolumbar spinal fractures. Spine 25:2079–2084. doi:10.1097/00007632-200008150-00012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Leferink VJ, Veldhuis EF, Zimmerman KW, ten Vergert EM, ten Duis HJ (2002) Classificational problems in ligamentary distraction type vertebral fractures: 30% of all B-type fractures are initially unrecognised. Eur Spine J 11:246–250. doi:10.1007/s00586-001-0366-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3:184–201. doi:10.1007/BF02221591

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McAfee PC, Yuan HA, Fredrickson BE, Lubicky JP (1983) The value of computed tomography in thoracolumbar fractures. An analysis of one hundred consecutive cases and a new classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:461–473

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McCormack T, Karaikovic E, Gaines RW (1994) The load sharing classification of spine fractures. Spine 19:1741–1744. doi:10.1097/00007632-199408000-00014

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mhuircheartaigh NN, Kerr JM, Murray JG (2006) MR imaging of traumatic spinal injuries. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 10:293–307. doi:10.1055/s-2007-972000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moon SH, Park MS, Suk KS, Suh JS, Lee SH, Kim NH, Lee HM (2002) Feasibility of ultrasound examination in posterior ligament complex injury of thoracolumbar spine fracture. Spine 27:2154–2158. doi:10.1097/00007632-200210010-00015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Oner FC, Ramos LM, Simmermacher RK, Kingma PT, Diekerhof CH, Dhert WJ, Verbout AJ (2002) Classification of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: problems of reproducibility. A study of 53 patients using CT and MRI. Eur Spine J 11:235–245. doi:10.1007/s00586-001-0364-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Oner FC, van Gils AP, Faber JA, Dhert WJ, Verbout AJ (2002) Some complications of common treatment schemes of thoracolumbar spine fractures can be predicted with magnetic resonance imaging: prospective study of 53 patients with 71 fractures. Spine 27:629–636. doi:10.1097/00007632-200203150-00012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Petersilge CA, Emery SE (1996) Thoracolumbar burst fracture: evaluating stability. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 17:105–113. doi:10.1016/S0887-2171(96)90010-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Petersilge CA, Pathria MN, Emery SE, Masaryk TJ (1995) Thoracolumbar burst fractures: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 194:49–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Raynor RB (1997) Intraoperative ultrasound for immediate evaluation of anterior cervical decompression and discectomy. Spine 22:389–395. doi:10.1097/00007632-199702150-00006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schnake KJ, von Scotti F, Haas NP, Kandziora F (2008) Type-B-distraction injuries of the thoracolumbar spine—misinterpretations of the integrity of the posterior ligament complex using radiologic diagnostics. Unfallchirurg 111:977–984. doi:10.1007/s00113-008-1503-z

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Terk MR, Hume-Neal M, Fraipont M, Ahmadi J, Colletti PM (1997) Injury of the posterior ligament complex in patients with acute spinal trauma: evaluation by MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:1481–1486

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Vaccaro AR, Lehman RA Jr, Hurlbert RJ, Anderson PA, Harris M, Hedlund R, Harrop J, Dvorak M, Wood K, Fehlings MG, Fisher C, Zeiller SC, Anderson DG, Bono CM, Stock GH, Brown AK, Kuklo T, Oner FC (2005) A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status. Spine 30:2325–2333. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000182986.43345.cb

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vaccaro AR, Zeiller SC, Hulbert RJ, Anderson PA, Harris M, Hedlund R, Harrop J, Dvorak M, Wood K, Fehlings MG, Fisher C, Lehman RA Jr, Anderson DG, Bono CM, Kuklo T, Oner FC (2005) The thoracolumbar injury severity score: a proposed treatment algorithm. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:209–215

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Whang PG, Vaccaro AR, Poelstra KA, Patel AA, Anderson DG, Albert TJ, Hilibrand AS, Harrop JS, Sharan AD, Ratliff JK, Hurlbert RJ, Anderson P, Aarabi B, Sekhon LH, Gahr R, Carrino JA (2007) The influence of fracture mechanism and morphology on the reliability and validity of two novel thoracolumbar injury classification systems. Spine 32:791–795. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000258882.96011.47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Vordemvenne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vordemvenne, T., Hartensuer, R., Löhrer, L. et al. Is there a way to diagnose spinal instability in acute burst fractures by performing ultrasound?. Eur Spine J 18, 964–971 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1009-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1009-6

Keywords

Navigation