Skip to main content
Log in

Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty

  • Review
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The implantation of lumbar disc prostheses based on different design concepts is widely accepted. This paper reviews currently available literature studies on the biomechanics of TDA in the lumbar spine, and is targeted at the evaluation of possible relationships between the aims of TDA and the geometrical, mechanical and material properties of the various available disc prostheses. Both theoretical and experimental studies were analyzed, by a PUBMED search (performed in February 2007, revised in January 2008), focusing on single level TDA. Both semi-constrained and unconstrained lumbar discs seem to be able to restore nearly physiological IAR locations and ROM values. However, both increased and decreased ROM was stated in some papers, unrelated to the clinical outcome. Segmental lordosis alterations after TDA were reported in most cases, for both constrained and unconstrained disc prostheses. An increase in the load through the facet joints was documented, for both semi-constrained and unconstrained artificial discs, but with some contrasting results. Semi-constrained devices may be able to share a greater part of the load, thus protecting the surrounding biological structure from overloading and possible early degeneration, but may be more susceptible to wear. The next level of development will be the biomechanical integration of compression across the motion segment. All these findings need to be supported by long-term clinical outcome studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Auerbach JD, Wills BP, McIntosh TC, Balderston RA (2007) Evaluation of spinal kinematics following lumbar total disc replacement and circumferential fusion using in vivo fluoroscopy. Spine 32(5):527–536. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000256915.90236.17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertagnoli R, Kumar S (2002) Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S131–S136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Kershaw T, Shah RV, Pfeiffer F, Fenk-Mayer A et al (2006) Lumbar total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis in smokers versus nonsmokers: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine 31(9):992–997. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000214970.07626.68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Shah RV, Nanieva R, Pfeiffer F, Fenk-Mayer A et al (2005) The treatment of disabling single-level lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the Prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine 30(19):2230–2236. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000182217.87660.40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Büttner-Janz K, Schellnack K, Zippel H (1989) Biomechanics of the SB Charité lumbar intervertebral disc endoprosthesis. Int Orthop 13(3):173–176. doi:10.1007/BF00268042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cakir B, Richter M, Kafer W, Puhl W, Schmidt R (2005) The impact of total lumbar disc replacement on segmental and total lumbar lordosis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 20(4):357–364. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.11.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cakir B, Richter M, Puhl W, Schmidt R (2006) Reliability of motion measurements after total disc replacement: the spike and the fin method. Eur Spine J 15(2):165–173. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0942-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang BS, Brown PR, Sieber A, Valdevit A, Tateno K, Kostuik JP (2004) Evaluation of the biological response of wear debris. Spine J 4(6(Suppl)):239S–244S. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chung SS, Lee CS, Kang CS, Kim SH (2006) The effect of lumbar total disc replacement on the spinopelvic alignment and range of motion of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(5):307–311. doi:10.1097/01.bsd.0000208255.14329.1e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chung SS, Lee CS, Kang CS (2006) Lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc II: a prospective study with a 2-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(6):411–415. doi:10.1097/00024720-200608000-00007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F (1996) Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 21(8):995–1000. doi:10.1097/00007632-199604150-00015

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cunningham BW, Dmitriev AE, Hu N, McAfee PC (2003) General principles of total disc replacement arthroplasty: seventeen cases in a nonhuman primate model. Spine 28(20):S118–S124. doi:10.1097/00007632-200310151-00005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cunningham BW, Gordon JD, Dmitriev AE, Hu N, McAfee PC (2003) Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 28(20):S110–S117. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000092209.27573.90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cunningham BW, Lowery GL, Serhan HA, Dmitriev AE, Orbegoso CM, McAfee PC et al (2002) Total disc replacement arthroplasty using the AcroFlex lumbar disc: a non-human primate model. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S115–S123. doi:10.1007/s005860100323

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cunningham BW, McAfee PC, Geisler FH, Holsapple G, Adams K, Blumenthal SL et al (2008) Distribution of in vivo and in vitro range of motion following 1-level arthroplasty with the CHARITE artificial disc compared with fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 8(1):7–12. doi:10.3171/SPI-08/01/007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cunningham BW (2004) Basic scientific considerations in total disc arthroplasty. Spine 4(6)(Suppl):219S–230S (Review). doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.015

    Google Scholar 

  17. David T (2007) Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine 32(6):661–666. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000257554.67505.45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. David T (2005) Revision of a Charité artificial disc 9.5 years in vivo to a new Charité artificial disc: case report and explant analysis. Eur Spine J 14(5):507–511. doi:10.1007/s00586-004-0842-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Delamarter RB, Fribourg DM, Kanim LE, Bae H (2003) ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial. Spine 28(20):S167–S175. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000092220.66650.2B

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Denoziere G, Ku DN (2006) Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc. J Biomech 39(4):766–775. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.07.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dooris AP, Goel VK, Grosland NM, Gilbertson LG, Wilder DG (2001) Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc. Spine 26(6):E122–E129. doi:10.1097/00007632-200103150-00004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Edeland HG (1981) Suggestions for a total elasto-dynamic intervertebral disc prosthesis. Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs 9(1):65–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Eijkelkamp MF, van Donkelaar CC, Veldhuizen AG, van Horn JR, Huyghe JM, Verkerke GJ (2001) Requirements for an artificial intervertebral disc. Int J Artif Organs 24(5):311–321

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Enker P, Steffee A, Mcmillin C, Keppler L, Biscup R, Miller S (1993) Artificial disc replacement. Preliminary report with a 3-year minimum follow-up. Spine 18(8):1061–1070. doi:10.1097/00007632-199306150-00017

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. François J, Coessens R, Lauweryns P (2007) Early removal of a Maverick disc prosthesis: surgical findings and morphological changes. Acta Orthop Belg 73(1):122–127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fraser RD, Ross ER, Lowery GL, Freeman BJ, Dolan M (2004) AcroFlex design and results. Spine J 4(6)(Suppl):245S–251S (Review). doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.020

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gloria A, Causa F, De Santis R, Netti PA, Ambrosio L (2007) Dynamic-mechanical properties of a novel composite intervertebral disc prosthesis. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 18(11):2159–2165. doi:10.1007/s10856-007-3003-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Goel VK, Grauer JN, Patel TC, Biyani A, Sairyo K, Vishnubhotla S et al (2005) Effects of Charité artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol. Spine 30(24):2755–2764. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000195897.17277.67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hedman TP, Kostuik JP, Fernie GR, Hellier WG (1991) Design of an intervertebral disc prosthesis. Spine 16(6(suppl)):S256–S260. doi:10.1097/00007632-199106001-00016

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hitchon PW, Eichholz K, Barry C, Rubenbauer P, Ingalhalikar A, Nakamura S et al (2005) Biomechanical studies of an artificial disc implant in the human cadaveric spine. J Neurosurg Spine 2(3):339–343

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hopf C, Heeckt H, Beske C (2002) Disc replacement with the SB Charite endoprosthesis—experience, preliminary results and comments after 35 prospectively performed operations. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 140(5):485–491. doi:10.1055/s-2002-34000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hou TS, Tu KY, Xu YK, Li ZB, Cai AH, Wang HC (1991) Lumbar intervertebral disc prosthesis. An experimental study. Chin Med J (Engl) 104(5):381–386

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, Lim MR, Tropiano P, Marnay T (2005) Correlation between range of motion and outcome after lumbar total disc replacement: 8.6-year follow-up. Spine 30(12):1407–1411. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000166528.67425.0e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, Wright TM (2003) The implications of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):412–417

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, Tropiano P, Marnay T (2003) Long-term flexion-extension range of motion of the prodisc total disc replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(5):435–440. doi:10.1097/00024720-200310000-00001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Huang RC, Tropiano P, Marnay T, Girardi FP, Lim MR, Cammisa FP Jr (2006) Range of motion and adjacent level degeneration after lumbar total disc replacement. Spine J 6(3):242–247. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2005.04.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kadoya K, Kotani Y, Abumi K, Takada T, Shimamoto N, Shikinami Y et al (2001) Biomechanical and morphologic evaluation of a three-dimensional fabric sheep artificial intervertebral disc: in vitro and in vivo analysis. Spine 26(14):1562–1569. doi:10.1097/00007632-200107150-00012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kiapour A, Goel VK, Faizan A, Krish M, Friesem T (2007). Lumbar spine kinematics following posterior total disc and artificial facet replacement. SAS 2007, Berlin. (Abstract)

  39. Kim DH, Ryu KS, Kim MK, Park CK (2007) Factors influencing segmental range of motion after lumbar total disc replacement using the ProDisc II prosthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 7(2):131–138. doi:10.3171/SPI-07/08/131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kosmopoulos V, McManus J, Schizas C (2008) Consequences of patient position in the radiographic measurement of artificial disc replacement angles. Eur Spine J 17(1):30–35. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0486-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kostuik JP (1997) Intervertebral disc replacement. Experimental study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 337:27–41. doi:10.1097/00003086-199704000-00004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kotani Y, Abumi K, Shikinami Y, Takada T, Kadoya K, Shimamoto N et al (2002) Artificial intervertebral disc replacement using bioactive three-dimensional fabric: design, development, and preliminary animal study. Spine 27(9):929–935. doi:10.1097/00007632-200205010-00008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kotani Y, Abumi K, Shikinami Y, Takahata M, Kadoya K, Kadosawa T, Minami A, Kaneda K (2004) Two-year observation of artificial intervertebral disc replacement: results after supplemental ultra-high strength bioresorbable spinal stabilization. J Neurosurg 100(4 Suppl Spine):337–342

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kotani Y, Cunningham BW, Abumi K, Dmitriev AE, Hu N, Ito M et al (2006) Multidirectional flexibility analysis of anterior and posterior lumbar artificial disc reconstruction: in vitro human cadaveric spine model. Eur Spine J 15(10):1511–1520. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-0086-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kurtz SM, Peloza J, Siskey R, Villarraga ML (2005) Analysis of a retrieved polyethylene total disc replacement component. Spine J 5(3):344–350. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2004.11.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kurtz SM, van Ooij A, Ross R, de Waal Malefijt J, Peloza J, Ciccarelli L et al (2007) Polyethylene wear and rim fracture in total disc arthroplasty. Spine J 7(1):12–21. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2006.05.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Langrana NA, Lee CK, Yang SW (1991) Finite-element modeling of the synthetic intervertebral disc. Spine 16(6(suppl)):S245–S252. doi:10.1097/00007632-199106001-00014

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Langrana NA, Parsons JR, Lee CK, Vuono-Hawkins M, Yang SW, Alexander H (1994) Materials and design concepts for an intervertebral disc spacer. I. fiber-reinforced composite design. J Appl Biomater 5(2):125–132. doi:10.1002/jab.770050205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Le Huec JC, Kiaer T, Friesem T, Mathews H, Liu M, Eisermann L (2003) Shock absorption in lumbar disc prosthesis: a preliminary mechanical study. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):346–351

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Le Huec J, Basso Y, Mathews H, Mehbod A, Aunoble S, Friesem T et al (2005) The effect of single-level, total disc arthroplasty on sagittal balance parameters: a prospective study. Eur Spine J 14(5):480–486. doi:10.1007/s00586-004-0843-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Le Huec JC, Basso Y, Aunoble S, Friesem T, Bruno MB (2005) Influence of facet and posterior muscle degeneration on clinical results of lumbar total disc replacement: two-year follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(3):219–223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Le Huec JC, Mathews H, Basso Y, Aunoble S, Hoste D, Bley B et al (2005) Clinical results of Maverick lumbar total disc replacement: two-year prospective follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am 36(3):315–322. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2005.02.001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Ledet EH, Tymeson MP, DiRisio DJ, Cohen B, Uhl RL (2005) Direct real-time measurement of in vivo forces in the lumbar spine. Spine J 5(1):85–94. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2004.06.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lee CK, Goel VK (2004) Artificial disc prosthesis: design concepts and criteria. Spine J 4(6)(Suppl):209S–218S (Review). doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.011

    Google Scholar 

  55. Leivseth G, Braaten S, Frobin W, Brinckmann P (2006) Mobility of lumbar segments instrumented with a ProDisc II prosthesis: a two-year follow-up study. Spine 31(15):1726–1733. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000224213.45330.68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Sariali el H, Skalli W, Lavaste F (2005) Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charite artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(4):353–359. doi:10.1097/01.bsd.0000172361.07479.6b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Lemaire JP, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Templier A, Mendes F, Diop A, et al. (1997) Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop Relat Res (337):64–76 (Review). doi:10.1097/00003086-199704000-00009

  58. Lim MR, Girardi FP, Zhang K, Huang RC, Peterson MG, Cammisa FP Jr (2005) Measurement of total disc replacement radiographic range of motion: a comparison of two techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(3):252–256

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Lim MR, Loder RT, Huang RC, Lyman S, Zhang K, Sama A et al (2006) Measurement error of lumbar total disc replacement range of motion. Spine 31(10):E291–E297. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000216452.54421.ea

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Mathew P, Blackman M, Redla S, Hussein AA (2005) Bilateral pedicle fractures following anterior dislocation of the polyethylene inlay of a ProDisc artificial disc replacement: a case report of an unusual complication. Spine 30(11):E311–E314. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000164135.03844.b6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, Adams K, Blumenthal S, Guyer RD et al (2005) A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 30(14):1576–1583. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000170561.25636.1c

    Google Scholar 

  62. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Hayes V, Sidiqi F, Dabbah M, Sefter JC et al (2006) Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty implications for patients with adult deformities. Spine 31(19(suppl)):S152–S160. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000234782.89031.03

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. McAfee PC, Geisler FH, Saiedy SS, Moore SV, Regan JJ, Guyer RD et al (2006) Revisability of the CHARITE artificial disc replacement: analysis of 688 patients enrolled in the U.S. IDE study of the CHARITE Artificial Disc. Spine 31(11):1217–1226. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000217689.08487.a8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Mizuno H, Roy AK, Vacanti CA, Kojima K, Ueda M, Bonassar LJ (2004) Tissue-engineered composites of anulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus for intervertebral disc replacement. Spine 29(12):1290–1297. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000128264.46510.27 discussion 1297–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Moore RJ, Fraser RD, Vernon-Roberts B, Finnie JW, Blumbergs PC, Haynes DR et al (2002) The biologic response to particles from a lumbar disc prosthesis. Spine 27(19):2088–2094. doi:10.1097/00007632-200210010-00003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Moumene M, Geisler FH (2007) Comparison of biomechanical function at ideal and varied surgical placement for two lumbar artificial disc implant designs: mobile-core versus fixed-core. Spine 32(17):1840–1851. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31811ec29c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Neal CJ, Rosner MK, Kuklo TR (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of adjacent segments after disc arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 3(5):342–347

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Noailly J, Lacroix D, Planell JA (2005) Finite element study of a novel intervertebral disc substitute. Spine 30(20):2257–2264. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000182319.81795.72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. O’Leary P, Nicolakis M, Lorenz MA, Voronov LI, Zindrick MR, Ghanayem A et al (2005) Response of Charite total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns. Spine J 5(6):590–599. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2005.06.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Ogston NG, King GJ, Gertzbein SD, Tile M, Kapasouri A, Rubenstein JD (1986) Centrode patterns in the lumbar spine. Baseline studies in normal subjects. Spine 11(6):591–595. doi:10.1097/00007632-198607000-00010

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Panjabi M, Henderson G, Abjornson C, Yue J (2007) Multidirectional testing of one- and two-level ProDisc-L versus simulated fusions. Spine 32(12):1311–1319. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318059af6f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Panjabi M, Malcolmson G, Teng E, Tominaga Y, Henderson G, Serhan H (2007) Hybrid testing of lumbar CHARITE discs versus fusions. Spine 32(9):959–966. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000260792.13893.88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Pimenta L, Pesantez CA, Lhamby J, Oliveira L, Schaffa T, Coutinho E (2008). Short term clinical results of an elastomeric lumbar disc prosthesis (Physio-L). Eurospine 2008, Geneva (Abstract)

  74. Putzier M, Funk JF, Schneider SV, Gross C, Tohtz SW, Khodadadyan-Klostermann C et al (2006) Charité total disc replacement—clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J 15(2):183–195. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-1022-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Revell PA, Damien E, Di Silvio L, Gurav N, Longinotti C, Ambrosio L (2007) Tissue engineered intervertebral disc repair in the pig using injectable polymers. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 18(2):303–308. doi:10.1007/s10856-006-0693-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Rohlmann A, Claes L, Bergmann G, Graichen F, Neef P, Wilke HJ (2001) Comparison of intradiscal pressures and spinal fixator loads for different body positions and exercises. Ergonomics 44(8):781–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Rohlmann A, Zander T, Bergmann G (2005) Effect of total disc replacement with ProDisc on intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine. Spine 30(7):738–743. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000157413.72276.c4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Rousseau MA, Bradford DS, Bertagnoli R, Hu SS, Lotz JC (2006) Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces. Spine J 6(3):258–266. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2005.07.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. SariAli el H, Lemaire JP, Pascal-Mousselard H, Carrier H, Skalli W (2006) In vivo study of the kinematics in axial rotation of the lumbar spine after total intervertebral disc replacement: long-term results: a 10–14 years follow up evaluation. Eur Spine J 15(10):1501–1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Sasso RC, Foulk DM, Hahn M (2008) Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain. Spine 33(2):123–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Schmidt H, Heuer F, Claes L, Wilke HJ (2008) The relation between the instantaneous center of rotation and facet joint forces - A finite element analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 23(3):270–278. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Schmiedberg SK, Chang DH, Frondoza CG, Valdevit AD, Kostuik JP (1994) Isolation and characterization of metallic wear debris from a dynamic intervertebral disc prosthesis. J Biomed Mater Res 28(11):1277–1288. doi:10.1002/jbm.820281105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Shaheen A, Shepherd DE (2007) Lubrication regimes in lumbar total disc arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 221(6):621–627. doi:10.1243/09544119JEIM204

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Shim CS, Lee S, Maeng DH, Lee SH (2005) Vertical split fracture of the vertebral body following total disc replacement using ProDisc: report of two cases. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(5):465–469. doi:10.1097/01.bsd.0000159035.35365.df

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Mayer M (2002) Spine arthroplasty: a historical review. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S65–S84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Takahata M, Kotani Y, Abumi K, Shikinami Y, Kadosawa T, Kaneda K et al (2003) Bone ingrowth fixation of artificial intervertebral disc consisting of bioceramic-coated three-dimensional fabric. Spine 28(7):637–644. doi:10.1097/00007632-200304010-00003 discussion 644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Tortolani PJ, Cunningham BW, Eng M, McAfee PC, Holsapple GA, Adams KA (2007) Prevalence of heterotopic ossification following total disc replacement. A prospective, randomized study of two hundred and seventy-six patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(1):82–88. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Tournier C, Aunoble S, Le Huec JC, Lemaire JP, Tropiano P, Lafage V et al (2007) Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement. Eur Spine J 16(3):411–421. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-0208-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Trouillier H, Kern P, Refior HJ, Muller-Gerbl M (2006) A prospective morphological study of facet joint integrity following intervertebral disc replacement with the CHARITE Artificial Disc. Eur Spine J 15(2):174–182. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-1010-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. van Ooij A, Kurtz SM, Stessels F, Noten H, van Rhijn L (2007) Polyethylene wear debris and long-term clinical failure of the Charite disc prosthesis: a study of 4 patients. Spine 32(2):223–229. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000251370.56327.c6 Erratum in: Spine. 2007 32. 9:1052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. van Ooij A, Oner FC, Verbout AJ (2003) Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charite disc. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):369–383

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Vuono-Hawkins M, Zimmerman MC, Lee CK, Carter FM, Parsons JR, Langrana NA (1994) Mechanical evaluation of a canine intervertebral disc spacer: in situ and in vivo studies. J Orthop Res 12(1):119–127. doi:10.1002/jor.1100120115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Wai EK, Santos ER, Morcom RA, Fraser RD (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging 20 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 31(17):1952–1956. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000228849.37321.a8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Wenzel SA, Shepherd DE (2007) Contact stresses in lumbar total disc arthroplasty. Biomed Mater Eng 17(3):169–173

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. White AA, Panjabi MM (1990). Physical properties and functional biomechanics of the spine. In: Clinical biomechanics of the spine 2nd edn, J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia

  96. Zeegers WS, Bohnen LM, Laaper M, Verhaegen MJ (1999) Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charite III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 8(3):210–217. doi:10.1007/s005860050160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Zeh A, Planert M, Siegert G, Lattke P, Held A, Hein W (2007) Release of cobalt and chromium ions into the serum following implantation of the metal-on-metal Maverick-type artificial lumbar disc (Medtronic Sofamor Danek). Spine 32(3):348–352. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000253599.89694.c0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM, Linovitz RJ, Danielson GO 3rd, Haider TT et al (2007) Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 32(11):1155–1162. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318054e377 discussion 1163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Galbusera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galbusera, F., Bellini, C.M., Zweig, T. et al. Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty. Eur Spine J 17, 1635–1650 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0811-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0811-x

Keywords

Navigation