Skip to main content
Log in

Intervertebral disc transplantation: a biological approach to motion preservation

  • Review
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intervertebral disc transplantation was developed in a bipedal animal model through the stages of autograft, fresh allograft and fresh frozen allograft. Results showed that the allografts were able to survive through a deep freezing protocol and maintain cell viability after transplantation without significant immunoreaction. Although degeneration of the allograft appeared to be inevitable, it was able to maintain stability and mobility of the functional spinal unit. These findings were similarly reproduced in the human clinical trial with excellent mid-term clinical results at 5 years. The process of evolution and findings were summarized in this review.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alini M, Roughley PJ, Antoniou J, Stoll T, Aebi M (2002) A biological approach to treating disc degeneration: not for today, but maybe for tomorrow. Eur Spine J Suppl 2:S215–S220

    Google Scholar 

  2. Flynn J, Rudert MJ, Olson E, Baratz M, Hanley E (1990) The effects of freezing or freeze-drying on the biomechanical properties of the canine intervertebral disc. Spine 15(6):567–570

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Frick SL, Hanley EN Jr, Meyer RA Jr, Ramp WK, Chapman TM (1994) Lumbar intervertebral disc transfer. A canine study. Spine 19(16):1826–1834

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ho G, Leung VY, Cheung KM, Chan D (2008) Effect of severity of intervertebral disc injury on mesenchymal stem cell-based regeneration. Connect Tissue Res 49(1):15–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Katsuura A, Hukuda S (1994) Experimental study of intervertebral disc allografting in the dog. Spine 19(21):2426–2432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Sariali el H et al (2005) Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charite artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Discord Tech 18:353–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Leung VY, Chan D, Cheung KM (2006) Regeneration of intervertebral disc by mesenchymal stem cells: potentials, limitations, and future direction. Eur Spine J (Suppl 3):S406–S413 [Epub (2006) 15 July Review]

  8. Luk KD, Ruan DK, Chow DH et al (1997) Intervertebral disc autografting in a bipedal animal model. Clin Orthop 337:13–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Luk KD, Ruan DK, Lu DS et al (2003) Fresh frozen intervertebral disc allografting in a bipedal animal model. Spine 28:864–870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsuzaki H, Wakabayashi K, Ishihara K, Ishikawa H, Ohkawa A (1996) Allografting intervertebral discs in dogs: a possible clinical application. Spine 21(2):178–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Olson EJ, Hanley EN Jr, Rudert MJ, Baratz ME (1991) Vertebral column allografts for the treatment of segmental spine defects. An experimental investigation in dogs. Spine 16(9):1081–1088

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Putzier M, Funk JF, Schneider SV et al (2006) Charite total disc replacement—clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J 15:183–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruan DK, He Q, Ding Y, Hou LS, Li JY, Luk KDK (2007) Intervertebral disc transplantation in the treatment of degenerative spine disease: a preliminary study. Lancet 369:993–999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ruan DK, Ding Y, He Q, Luk KDK (2008) Allograft disc transplantation—Preserving segment motion and rebuilding stability of the cervical spine. InSpine 4(2):20–24

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schneiderman G, Flannigan B, Kingston S et al (1987) Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of disc degeneration: correlation with discography. Spine 12:276–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith D. K. Luk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luk, K.D.K., Ruan, D.K. Intervertebral disc transplantation: a biological approach to motion preservation. Eur Spine J 17 (Suppl 4), 504–510 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0748-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0748-0

Keywords

Navigation