Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A New Conceptual Model of Neck Pain

Linking Onset, Course, and Care: The Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders

  • Conceptual Model
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Study Design

Iterative discussion and consensus by a multidisciplinary task force scientific secretariat reviewing scientific evidence on neck pain and its associated disorders.

Objective

To provide an integrated model for linking the epidemiology of neck pain with its management and consequences, and to help organize and interpret existing knowledge, and to highlight gaps in the current literature.

Summary of Background Data

The wide variability of scientific and clinical approaches to neck pain described in the literature requires a unified conceptual model for appropriate interpretation of the research evidence.

Methods

The 12-member Scientific Secretariat of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders critically reviewed and eventually accepted as scientifically admissible a total of 552 scientific papers. The group met face-to-face on 18 occasions and had frequent additional telephone conference meetings over a 6-year period to discuss and interpret this literature and to agree on a conceptual model, which would accommodate findings. Models and definitions published in the scientific literature were discussed and repeatedly modified until the model and case definitions presented here were finally approved by the group.

Results

Our new conceptual model is centered on the person with neck pain or who is at risk for neck pain. Neck pain is viewed as an episodic occurrence over a lifetime with variable recovery between episodes. The model outlines the options available to individuals who are dealing with neck pain, along with factors that determine options, choices, and consequences. The short- and long-term impacts of neck pain are also considered. Finally, the model includes a 5-axis classification of neck pain studies based on how subjects were recruited into each study.

Conclusion

The Scientific Secretariat found the conceptual model helpful in interpreting the available scientific evidence. We believe it can assist people with neck pain, researchers, clinicians, and policy makers in framing their questions and decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bliss SJ, Flanders SA, Saint S. (2004) Clinical problem-solving. A pain in the neck. N Engl J Med 350:1037–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Harris ED, Budd R, Firestein GS, et al. Neck Pain. Kelley’s Textbook of Rheumatology. 7 ed. Elsevier; 2006.

  3. Haldeman S, Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD. Introduction/mandate: the empowerment of people with neck pain. The Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine 2007.

  4. Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Peloso PM, et al. Methods for the best evidence synthesis on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. The Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine 2008;33(Suppl):S33–S38.

    Google Scholar 

  5. International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). IASP Task Force for Taxonomy. Pain Terminology. Seattle: IASP; 2004.

  6. Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, et al. Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-associated disorders: redefining “whiplash” and its management. Spine 1995;20:1S–73S.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bongers PM, Ijmker S, van den HS, et al. Epidemiology of work related neck and upper limb problems: psychosocial and personal risk factors (part I) and effective interventions from a bio behavioural perspective (part II). J Occup Rehabil 2006;16:279–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dorshimer GW, Kelly M (2005) Cervical pain in the athlete: common conditions and treatment. Prim Care 32:231–43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Borghouts JA, Koes BW, Bouter LM. The clinical course and prognostic factors of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. Pain 1998;77:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization. International Classification of Function, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001.

  11. Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, et al. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992;50:133–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Côté P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L, et al. A systematic review of the prognosis of acute whiplash and a new conceptual framework to synthesize the literature. Spine 2001;26:E445–E458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van der Velde G, Hogg-Johnson S, Bayoumi A, et al. Identifying the best treatment among common non-invasive neck pain treatments: a decision analysis. Spine 2008;33(Suppl):S184–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bot SD, van der Waal JM, Terwee CB et al. (2005) Predictors of outcome in neck and shoulder symptoms: a cohort study in general practice. Spine 30: E459–E470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carroll LJ, Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, et al. Course and prognostic factors for neck pain in the general population. Results of the Bone and Joint decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine 2008;33(Suppl):S75–S82.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hadler NM. Occupational Musculoskeletal Disorders. 3 ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005:1--339.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Beaton DE, Tarasuk V, Katz JN, et al. Are you better? A qualitative study of the meaning of recovery. Arthritis Rheum 2001;45:270–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ariens GA, van Mechelen W, Bongers PM, et al (2000) Physical risk factors for neck pain. Scand J Work Environ Health 26:7–19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ariens GA, van Mechelen W, Bongers PM, et al. Psychosocial risk factors for neck pain: a systematic review. Am J Ind Med 2001;39:180–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ, et al. The burden and determinants of neck pain in the general population: Results of the Bone and Joint decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine 2008;33(Suppl):S39 –S51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stahl M, Mikkelsson M, Kautiainen H, et al. Neck pain in adolescence. A 4-year follow-up of pain-free preadolescents. Pain 2004;110:427–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. van Gent C, Dols J, de Rover C, et al. The weight of schoolbags and the occurrence of neck, shoulder, and back pain in young adolescents. Spine 2003;9:916–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Haldeman S (2007) The Pyrite standard: the Midas touch in the diagnosis of axial pain syndromes. Spine 7:27–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hartling L, Brison RJ, Ardern C, et al (2001) Prognostic value of the Quebec classification of Whiplash-associated disorders. Spine 26:36–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Côté P, van der Velde G, Cassidy JD, et al. The burden and determinants of neck pain in workers. Results of the Bone and Joint 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine 2008;33(Suppl):S60 –S74.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Holm LW, Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, et al. The burden and determinants of neck pain in whiplash-associated disorders after traffic collisions: results of the Bone and Joint decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine 2008;33(Suppl):S52–S59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Côté P, et al. Effect of eliminating compensation for pain and suffering on the outcome of insurance claims for whiplash injury. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1179–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Carroll LJ, Hurwitz EL, Côté P, et al. Research priorities and methodological implications. Results of the Bone and Joint decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine 2008;33(Suppl):S213–S219.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Suissa S, Harder S, Veilleux M. The relation between initial symptoms and signs and the prognosis of whiplash. Eur Spine J2001;10:44–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity. BMJ 1994;308:1552.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Guzman J, Haldeman S, Carroll LJ, et al. Practice implications of the results of the Bone and Joint decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders: from concepts and findings to recommendations. Spine 2008;33(Suppl):S199–S212.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nordin M, Carragee EJ, Hogg-Johnson S, et al. Assessment of Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Results of the Bone and Joint decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine 2008; 33(Suppl):S101–S122.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hurwitz EL, Carragee EJ, van der Velde G, et al. Treatment of neck pain: non-invasive interventions. Results of the Bone and Joint decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine 2008; 33(Suppl):S123–S152.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Cheng I, et al. Treatment of neck pain: injections and surgical interventions. Results of the Bone and Joint decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine 2008; 33(Suppl):S153–S169.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaime Guzman MD, MSc, FRCP(C).

Additional information

The manuscript submitted does not contain information about medical device(s)/drug(s).

No funds were received in support of this work. No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

Reprinted with permission from Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Guzman J, Hurwitz EL, Carroll LJ, et al., A New Conceptual Model of Neck Pain, Linking Onset, Course, and Care: The Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders, SPINE, Volume 33, Number 4S, pp S14–S23

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guzman, J., Hurwitz, E.L., Carroll, L.J. et al. A New Conceptual Model of Neck Pain. Eur Spine J 17 (Suppl 1), 14–23 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0621-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0621-1

Keywords

Navigation