Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Risk factors for back pain-related loss of working time after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a 5-year follow-up study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore the occurrence and the risk factors of back-related loss of working time in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar disc herniation. One hundred and fifty-two gainfully employed patients underwent surgery for lumbar disc herniation. Two months postoperatively, those patients completed a self-report questionnaire including queries on back and leg pain (VAS), functional capacity (Oswestry disability index—ODI, version 1.0), and motivation to work. After 5 years, lost working time was evaluated by means of a postal questionnaire about sick leave and disability pensions. The cumulative number of back pain-related days-off work was calculated for each patient. All 152 patients, 86 men and 66 women, were prescribed sick leave for the first 2 months. Thereafter, 80 (53%) of them reported back pain-related sick leave or early retirement. A permanent work disability pension due to back problems was awarded to 15 (10%) patients, 5 men (6%) and 10 women (15%). Median number of all work disability days per year was 11 (interquartile range [IQR] 9–37); it was 9 days (IQR 9–22) in patients with minimal disability (ODI score 0–20) at 2 months postoperatively and 67 days (IQR 9–352) in those with moderate or severe disability (ODI > 20; P < 0.001). The respective means were 61, 29, and 140 days/year. Multivariate analysis showed ODI > 20, leg pain, and poor motivation to work to be the risk factors for extension of work disability. Results of the present study show that after the lumbar disc surgery, poor outcome in questionnaire measures the physical functioning (ODI) and leg pain at 2 months postoperatively, as well as poor motivation to work, are associated with the loss of working time. Patients with unfavourable prognosis should be directed to rehabilitation before the loss of employment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atlas SJ, Chang Y, Kammann E, Keller RB, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2000) Long-term disability and return to work among patients who have a herniated lumbar disc: the effect of disability compensation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:4–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Chang Y, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2001) Surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disk herniation: five-year outcomes from the Maine lumbar spine study. Spine 26:1179–1187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Balague F, Nordin M, Sheikhzadeh A, Echegoyen AC, Brisby H, Hoogewoud HM, Fredman P, Skovron ML (1999) Recovery of severe sciatica. Spine 24:2516–2524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barrios C, Ahmed M, Arrotequi JI, Bjornsson A (1990) Clinical factors predicting outcome after surgery for herniated lumbar disc: an epidemiological multivariate analysis. J Spinal Disord 3:205–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. den Boer J, Oostendorp R, Beems T, Munneke M, Evers A (2006) Reduced work capacity after lumbar disc surgery: the role of cognitive-behavioral and work-related risk factors. Pain 126:72–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. den Boer J, Oostendorp R, Beems T,Munneke M, Oerlemans M, Evers A (2006) A systematic review of bio-psychosocial risk factors for an unfavourable outcome after lumbar disc surgery. Eur Spine J 15:527–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Wiundt DA, Feleus A, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Knol DL et al (2004) Internal consistency and validity of a new physical workload questionnaire. Occup Environ Med 61:980–986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Carragee EJ, Han MY, Yang B, Kim DH, Kraemer H, Billys J (1999) Activity restrictions after lumbar discectomy. A prospective study of outcomes in 152 cases with no postoperative restrictions. Spine 24:2346–2351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan G, Tan V, Koh D (2000) Ageing and fitness to work. Occup Med (Lond) 50:483–491

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi G, Raiturker PP, Kim MJ, Jin CD, Chae YS (2005) The effect of early isolated lumbar extension exercise program for patients with herniated disc undergoing lumbar discectomy. Neurosurgery 57:764–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Danielsen JM, Johnsen R, Kibsgaard SK, Hellevik E (2000) Early aggressive exercise for postoperative rehabilitation after discectomy. Spine 25:1015–1020

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Deyo RA, Loeser JD, Bigos SJ (1990) Herniated lumbar intervertebral disk. Ann Intern Med 112:598–603

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dixon S, Bird H (1981) Reproducibility along a 10 cm visual analogue scale. Ann Rheum Dis 40:87–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dolan P, Greenfield K, Nelson RJ, Nelson IW (2000). Can exercise therapy improve the outcome of microdiscectomy? Spine 25:1523–1532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Donceel P, Du Bois M (1999) Predictors for work incapacity continuing after disc surgery. Scand J Work Environ Health 25:264–271

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Donceel P, Du Bois M, Lahaye D (1999) Return to work after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. A rehabilitation-oriented approach in insurance medicine. Spine 24:872–876

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Esbjörnsson E (1984) Personlinghet och smärta. Psykologiska factorers betydelse för arbetsåtergång hos patienter med kroniska långryggsbesvär. Academic dissertation. Göteborg Universitet, Göteborg

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fairbank JCT, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry disability index. Spine 25:2940–2952

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Filiz M, Cakmak A, Ozcan E (2005) The effectiveness of exercise programmes after lumbar disc surgery: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil 19:4–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Frank JW, Brooker AS, DeMaio SE, Kerr MS, Maetzel A, Shannon HS, Sullivan TJ, Norman RW, Wells RP (1996) Disability resulting from occupational low back pain. Part II: what do we know about secondary prevention? A review of the scientific evidence on prevention after disability begins. Spine 21:2918–2929

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Graver V, Haaland AK, Magnaes B, Loeb M (1999) Seven-year clinical follow-up after lumbar disc surgery: results and predictors of outcome. Br J Neurosurg 13:178–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hasenbring M, Marienfeld G, Kuhlendahl D, Soyka D (1994) Risk factors of chronicity in lumbar disc patients. A prospective investigation of biologic, psychologic, and social predictors of therapy outcome. Spine 19:2759–2765

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Heliövaara M, Sievers K, Impivaara O, Maatela J, Knekt P, Mäkelä M, Aromaa A (1989) Descriptive epidemiology and public health aspects of low back pain. Ann Med 21:327–333

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hurme M, Alaranta H. (1987) Factors predicting the results of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 12:933–938

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Häkkinen A, Ylinen J, Kautiainen H, Airaksinen O, Herno A, Kiviranta I (2003) Does the outcome 2 months after lumbar disc surgery predict the outcome 12 months later? Disabil Rehabil 25:968–972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jonsson D, Husberg M (2000) Socioeconomic costs of rheumatic diseases. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 16:1193–1200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Junge A, Frohlich M, Ahrens S, Hasenbring M, Sandler A, Grob D, Dvorak J (1996) Predictors of bad and good outcome of lumbar spine surgery. A prospective clinical study with 2 years follow up. Spine 21:1056–1064

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Katz JN, Punnett L, Simmons BP, Fossel AH, Mooney N, Keller RB (1996) Workers’ compensation recipients with carpal tunnel syndrome: the validity of self-reported health measures. Am J Public Health 86:52–56

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Keltikangas-Järvinen L, Rimon R (1987) Rimon’s brief depression scale, a rapid method for screening depression. Psychol Rep 60:111–119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kohlboeck G, Greimel KV, Piotrowski WP, Leibetseder M, Krombholz-Reindl M, Neuhofer R et al (2004) Prognosis of multifactorial outcome in lumbar discectomy: a prospective longitudinal study investigating patients with disc prolapse. Clin J Pain 20:455–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kotilainen E, Valtonen S, Carlson CA (1993) Microsurgical treatment of lumbar disk herniation: follow-up of 237 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 120:143–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Latham GP, Pinder CC (2005) Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annu Rev Psychol 56:485–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lewis PJ, Weir BK, Broad RW, Grace MG (1987) Long-term prospective study of lumbosacral discectomy. J Neurosurg 67:49–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Loupasis GA, Stamos K, Katonis PG, Sapkas G, Korres DS, Hartofilakidis G (1999) Seven to twenty years outcome of lumbar discectomy. Spine 24:2313–2317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Marnetoft SU, Selander J (2002) Long-term effects of early versus delayed vocational rehabilitation: a four-year follow-up. Disabil Rehabil 24:741–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mayou R, Bryant B (1987) Quality of life after coronary artery surgery. Q J Med 62:239–248

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Merkesdal S, Mau W (2005) Prediction of cost-of-illness in patients with low back pain undergoing orthopedic outpatient rehabilitation. Int J Rehabil Res 28:119–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nygaard OP, Romner B, Trumpy JH (1994) Duration of symptoms as a predictor of outcome after lumbar disc surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 128:53–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Nygaard OP, Kloster R, Solberg T (2000) Duration of leg pain as a predictor of outcome after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective cohort study with 1 year follow-up. J Neurosurg 92(Suppl 2):131–134

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Puolakka K, Kautiainen H, Pekurinen M, Möttönen T, Hannonen P, Korpela M et al (2006) Monetary value of lost productivity over a 5 year follow up in early rheumatoid arthritis estimated on the basis of official register data on patients’ sickness absence and gross income: experience from the FIN-RACo Trial. Ann Rheum Dis 65:699–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rush AJ, Polatin P, Gatchel RJ (2000) Depression and chronic low back pain: establishing priorities in treatment. Spine 25:2566–2571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Saal JA, Saal JS, Herzog RJ (1990) The natural history of lumbar intervertebral disc extrusions treated nonoperatively. Spine 15:683–686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Schade V, Semmer N, Main CJ, Hora J, Boos N (1999) The impact of clinical, morphological, psychosocial and work-related factors on the outcome of lumbar discectomy. Pain 80:239–249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Trief PM, Grant W, Fredrickson B (2000) A prospective study of psychological predictors of lumbar surgery outcome. Spine 25:2616–2621

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Viikari-Juntura E, Rauas S, Kuosma E, Riihimäki H, Takala E-S, Saarenmaa K (1996) Validity of self-reported physical work load in epidemiologic studies on musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 22:251–259

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Vucetic N, Astrand P, Güntner P, Svensson O (1999) Diagnosis and prognosis in lumbar disc herniation. Clin Ortop Rel Res 361:116–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 8:131–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Woertgen C, Rothoerl RD, Holzschuh M, Breme K, Brawanski A (1998) Are prognostic factors still what they are expected to be after long-term follow-up? J Spinal Disord 11:395–399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Wood EG, Hanley EN (1991) Lumbar disc herniation and open limited discectomy: indications, techniques, and results. Oper Tech Ortop 1:23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yilmaz F, Yilmaz A, Merdol F, Parlar D, Sahin F, Kuran B (2003) Efficacy of dynamic lumbar stabilization exercise in lumbar microdiscectomy. J Rehabil Med 35:163–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Medical Research Foundation of Jyväskylä Central Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Lappeenranta Central Hospital, Valto Käkelän katu 1, 53130, Lappeenranta, Finland

    K. Puolakka

  2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland

    J. Ylinen & A. Häkkinen

  3. Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland

    M. H. Neva

  4. Medcare Foundation, Äänekoski, Finland

    H. Kautiainen

  5. Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland

    A. Häkkinen

Authors
  1. K. Puolakka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Ylinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. H. Neva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H. Kautiainen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Häkkinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Puolakka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Puolakka, K., Ylinen, J., Neva, M.H. et al. Risk factors for back pain-related loss of working time after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a 5-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J 17, 386–392 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0552-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0552-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation