Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The reliability of the Vernon and Mior neck disability index, and its validity compared with the short form-36 health survey questionnaire

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prospective single cohort study. To evaluate the NDI by comparison with the SF36 health Survey Questionnaire. The NDI is a simple ten-item questionnaire used to assess patients with neck pain. The SF36 measures functional ability, well being and the overall health of patients. It is used as a gold standard in health economics to assess the health utility, gain and economic impact of medical interventions. One hundred and sixty patients with neck pain attending the spinal clinic completed self-assessment questionnaires. A second questionnaire was completed in 34 patients after a period of 1–2 weeks. The internal consistency of the NDI and SF36 was calculated using Cronbach’s alpha. The test–retest reliability was assessed using the Bland and Altman method. The concurrent validity of the NDI with respect to the SF-36 was assessed using Pearson correlations. Both questionnaires showed robust internal consistency: Cronbach’s alpha for the NDI scale was acceptable (0.864, 95% confidence limits 0.825–0.894) though slightly smaller than that of the SF36. The correlations between each item of the NDI scores and the total NDI score ranged from 0.447 to 0.659, (all with P < 0.001). The test–retest reliability of the NDI was high (intra-class correlation 0.93, 95% confidence limits 0.86–0.97) and comparable with the best values found for SF36. The correlations between NDI and SF36 domains ranged from −0.45 to −0.74 (all with P < 0.001). We have shown that the NDI has good reliability and validity and that it compares well with the SF36 in the spinal surgery out patient setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackelman BH, Lindgren U (2002) Validity and reliability of a modified version of the neck disability index. J Rehabil Med 34:284–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bland JM, Altman DG (1996) Measurement error. Br Med J 313:744–746

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bland JM, Altman DG (1997) Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ 314:572

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bovim G, Schrader H, Sand T (1994) Neck pain in the general population. Spine 19:1307–1309

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Palmer JA (2006) The reliability and construct validity of the neck disability index and patient specific functional scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Spine 31:598–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fairbank JCT, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry disability index. Spine 25:2940–2953

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fairbank JCT, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Garratt AM, Ruter DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT (1993) The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS. Br Med J 306:1440–3

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Grevitt M, Khazim R, Webb JK, Mulholland R, Shepperd (1997) The short form-36 health survey questionnaire in spine surgery. Br J Bone Joint Surg 79:48–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gruez M, Hildingsson C, Nilsson M, Toolanen G (2002) The prevalence of neck pain—a population-based study from northern Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 73:455–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hains F, Waalen J, Mior S (1998) Psychometric properties of the neck disability index. J Manip Physiol Thera 21:75–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hermann KM, Reese CS (2001) Relationships among selected measures of impairment, functional limitation, and disability in patients with cervical spine disorders. Phys Ther 81:903–914

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoving JL, O’Leary EF, Niere KR, Green S, Buchbinder R (2003) Validity of the neck disability index, Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire, and problem elicitation technique for measuring disability associated with whiplash-associated disorders. Pain 102:273–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L (1993) Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. Br Med J 306:1437–1440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jenkinson C, Layte R, Wright L, Coulter A (2006) The UK SF-36: An analysis and interpretation manual. Health Services Research Unit, University of Oxford March 2006

  16. Jette DU, Jette AM (1996) Physical therapy and health outcomes in patients with spinal impairments. Phys Ther 76:930–941

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Korthals-de Bos IB, Hoving JL, van Tulder MW, Rutten-van Molken MP, Ader HJ, de Vet HC, Koes BW, Vondeling H, Bouter LM (2003) Cost effectiveness of physiotherapy, manual therapy, and general practitioner care for neck pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 326:911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Marx RG, Menezes A, Horovitz L, Jones EC, Warren RF (2003) A comparison of two time intervals for test–retest reliability of health status instruments. J Clin Epidemiol 56:730–735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Muller U, Duetz MS, Roeder C, Greenough CG (2003) Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Eur Spine J 13:301–324

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pietrobon R, Coeytaux RR, Carey TS, Richardson WJ, DeVellis RF (2002) Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction. Spine 27:515–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Riddle DL, Stratford PW (1998) Use of generic versus region specific functional status measures on patients with cervical disorders. Phys Ther 78:951–963

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vernon H, Mior S (1991) The neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manip Physiol Ther 14:409–415

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vos CJ, Verhagen AP, Koes BW (2006) Reliability and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Neck Disability Index in patients with acute neck pain in general practice. Eur Spine J 15:1729–1736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. White AR, Ernst E (1999) A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of acupuncture for neck pain. Rheumatology 38:143–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. P. Grevitt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCarthy, M.J.H., Grevitt, M.P., Silcocks, P. et al. The reliability of the Vernon and Mior neck disability index, and its validity compared with the short form-36 health survey questionnaire. Eur Spine J 16, 2111–2117 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0503-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0503-y

Keywords

Navigation