Skip to main content

Total lumbar disc replacement in athletes: clinical results, return to sport and athletic performance

European Spine Journal volume 16, pages 1001–1013 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Despite the increasing popularity of total lumbar disc replacement (TDR) in predominantly young and active patients, no previous study has addressed possibilities, limitations and potential risks regarding athletic performance following TDR. Mechanical concerns remain and the implant’s resilience as regards its load-bearing capacity during sporting activities is unknown. Thirty-nine athletic patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this study. These patients participated in a large variety of different types of sport. Significant and lasting pain-relief was attained following TDR with a mean follow-up of 26.3 months (range 9–50.7 months; FU rate 97.4%). Sporting activity was resumed within the first 3 months (38.5%) to 6 months (30.7%) with peak performance being reached after 5.2 months. Thirty-seven patients (94.9%) achieved resumption of sporting activity. Athletic performance improved significantly in 33 patients (84.6%). Minor subsidence was observed in 13 patients (30%) within the first 3 months with no further implant migration thereafter in 12 patients. Participation in all types of sport recorded in this study was accessible for a high rate of patients up to the level of professional athletes as well as those participating in extreme sports. Preoperative participation in sport proved to be a strong positive predictor for highly satisfactory postoperative outcome following TDR. In a selected group of patients, however, preoperative inability to participate in sporting activities did not impair postoperative physical activity. Due to the young age of the patients and significant load increase exerted during athletic activities, persisting concerns regarding the future behaviour of the implant remain and will require longer follow-up, modified investigation techniques and larger patient cohorts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Anderson PA, Rouleau JP (2004) Intervertebral disc arthroplasty. Spine 29:2779–2786

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bahr R, Andersen SO, Loken S, Fossan B, Hansen T, Holme I (2004) Low back pain among endurance athletes with and without specific back loading—a cross-sectional survey of cross-country skiers, rowers, orienteerers, and nonathletic controls. Spine 29:449–454

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bertagnoli R, Marnay T, Mayer HM (eds) (2003) Spine Solutions GmbH. The ProDisc Book, Tuttlingen

  4. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Shah RV, Nanieva R, Pfeiffer F, Fenk-Mayer A, Kershaw T, Husted DS (2005) The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine 30:2192–2199

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Block AR, Vanharanta H, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD (1996) Discographic pain report. Influence of psychological factors Spine 21:334–338

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, Hochschuler SH, Geisler FH, Holt RT, Garcia R Jr, Regan JJ, Ohnmeiss DD (2005) A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1565–1575; discussion E1387–E1591

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bono CM (2004) Low-back pain in athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:382–396

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cakir B, Richter M, Puhl W, Schmidt R (2006) Reliability of motion measurements after total disc replacement: the spike and the fin method. Eur Spine J 15:165–173

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cappozzo A, Felici F, Figura F, Gazzani F (1985) Lumbar spine loading during half-squat exercises. Med Sci Sports Exerc 17:613–620

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Carragee EJ, Tanner CM, Yang B, Brito JL, Truong T (1999) False-positive findings on lumbar discography. Reliability of subjective concordance assessment during provocative disc injection. Spine 24:2542–2547

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Carragee EJ, Chen Y, Tanner CM, Hayward C, Rossi M, Hagle C (2000) Can discography cause long-term back symptoms in previously asymptomatic subjects? Spine 25:1803–1808

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng CK, Chen HH, Chen CS, Lee SJ (1998) Influences of walking speed change on the lumbosacral joint force distribution. Biomed Mater Eng 8:155–165

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cholewicki J, McGill SM, Norman RW (1991) Lumbar spine loads during the lifting of extremely heavy weights. Med Sci Sports Exerc 23:1179–1186

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chung SS, Lee CS, Kang CS, Kim SH (2006) The effect of lumbar total disc replacement on the spinopelvic alignment and range of motion of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:307–311

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F (1996) Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 21:995–1000

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Delamarter RB, Fribourg DM, Kanim LE, Bae H (2003) ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial. Spine 28:S167–S175

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dvorak J, Panjabi MM, Chang DG, Theiler R, Grob D (1991) Functional radiographic diagnosis of the lumbar spine. Flexion-extension and lateral bending. Spine 16:562–571

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Frobin W, Brinckmann P, Leivseth G, Biggemann M, Reikeras O (1996) Precision measurement of segmental motion from flexion-extension radiographs of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 11:457–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gatt CJ Jr, Hosea TM, Palumbo RC, Zawadsky JP (1997) Impact loading of the lumbar spine during football blocking. Am J Sports Med 25:317–321

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Granhed H, Morelli B (1988) Low back pain among retired wrestlers and heavyweight lifters. Am J Sports Med 16:530–533

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Guyer RD, Ohnmeiss DD (2003) Intervertebral disc prostheses. Spine 28:S15–S23

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hainline B (1995) Low back injury. Clin Sports Med 14:241–265

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hallab N, Link HD, McAfee PC (2003) Biomaterial optimization in total disc arthroplasty. Spine 28:S139–S152

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Holland B (2001) Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison posterior tangent methods. Spine 26:E235–E242

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hosea TM, Boland AL (1989) Rowing Injuries. Postgrad Adv Sports Med III:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hosea TM, Gatt CJ Jr, McCarthy KE, Langrana NA, Zawadsky JP (1989) Analytical computation of rapid dynamic loading of the lumbar spine. Trans Orthop Res Soc 14:358

    Google Scholar 

  28. Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, Tropiano P, Marnay T (2003) Long-term flexion-extension range of motion of the prodisc total disc replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:435–440

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Huang RC, Lim MR, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr (2004) The prevalence of contraindications to total disc replacement in a cohort of lumbar surgical patients. Spine 29:2538–2541

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, Lim MR, Tropiano P, Marnay T (2005) Correlation between range of motion and outcome after lumbar total disc replacement: 8.6-year follow-up. Spine 30:1407–1411

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Le Huec JC, Basso Y, Aunoble S, Friesem T, Bruno MB (2005) Influence of facet and posterior muscle degeneration on clinical results of lumbar total disc replacement: two-year follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:219–223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Junge A, Frohlich M, Ahrens S, Hasenbring M, Sandler A, Grob D, Dvorak J (1996) Predictors of bad and good outcome of lumbar spine surgery. A prospective clinical study with 2 years’ follow up. Spine 21:1056–1064; discussion 1064–1055

    Google Scholar 

  33. de Kleuver M, Oner FC, Jacobs WC (2003) Total disc replacement for chronic low back pain: background and a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 12:108–116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kostuik JP (1997) Intervertebral disc replacement. Experimental study. Clin Orthop Relat Res (337):27–41

  35. Ledet EH, Tymeson MP, DiRisio DJ, Cohen B, Uhl RL (2005) Direct real-time measurement of in vivo forces in the lumbar spine. Spine J 5:85–94

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Leivseth G, Braaten S, Frobin W, Brinckmann P (2006) Mobility of lumbar segments instrumented with a ProDisc II prosthesis: a two-year follow-up study. Spine 31:1726–1733

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Ali el HS, Skalli W, Lavaste F (2005) Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charite artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:353–359

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lim MR, Girardi FP, Zhang K, Huang RC, Peterson MG, Cammisa FP Jr (2005) Measurement of total disc replacement radiographic range of motion: a comparison of two techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:252–256

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lim MR, Loder RT, Huang RC, Lyman S, Zhang K, Sama A, Papadopoulos EC, Warner K, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr (2006) Measurement Error of Lumbar Total Disc Replacement Range of Motion. Spine 31:E291–E297

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lotters F, Hogg-Johnson S, Burdorf A (2005) Health status, its perceptions, and effect on return to work and recurrent sick leave. Spine 30:1086–1092

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mayer HM, Wiechert K (2002) Microsurgical anterior approaches to the lumbar spine for interbody fusion and total disc replacement. Neurosurgery 51:S159–165

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mayer HM, Wiechert K, Korge A, Qose I (2002) Minimally invasive total disc replacement: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results. Eur Spine J 2(11Suppl):S124–S130

    Google Scholar 

  43. McAfee PC, Fedder IL, Saiedy S, Shucosky EM, Cunningham BW (2003) SB Charite disc replacement: report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a US center. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:424–433

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. McCalden RW, Naudie DD, Yuan X, Bourne RB (2005) Radiographic methods for the assessment of polyethylene wear after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2323–2334

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mirza SK (2005) Point of view: commentary on the research reports that led to Food and Drug Administration approval of an artificial disc. Spine 30:1561–1564

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Morris FL, Smith RM, Payne WR, Galloway MA, Wark JD (2000) Compressive and shear force generated in the lumbar spine of female rowers. Int J Sports Med 21:518–523

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Noailly J, Lacroix D, Planell JA (2005) Finite element study of a novel intervertebral disc substitute. Spine 30:2257–2264

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. van Ooij A, Oner FC, Verbout AJ (2003) Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charite disc. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:369–383

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Polly DW Jr (2003) Adapting innovative motion-preserving technology to spinal surgical practice: what should we expect to happen? Spine 28:S104–S109

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ranson CA, Kerslake RW, Burnett AF, Batt ME, Abdi S (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic professional fast bowlers in cricket. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1111–1116

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Siepe CJ, Mayer HM, Wiechert K, Korge A (2006) Clinical results of total lumbar disc replacement with ProDisc II: three-year results for different indications. Spine 31:1923–1932

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Siepe CJ, Mayer HM, Heinz-Leisenheimer M, Korge A (2006) Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels. Spine (accepted for publication)

  53. Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Marnay T (2003) Lumbar disc replacement: preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:362–368

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr, Marnay T (2005) Lumbar total disc replacement. Seven to eleven-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87-A:490–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Videman T, Sarna S, Battie MC, Koskinen S, Gill K, Paananen H, Gibbons L (1995) The long-term effects of physical loading and exercise lifestyles on back-related symptoms, disability, and spinal pathology among men. Spine 20:699–709

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wang JC, Shapiro MS, Hatch JD, Knight J, Dorey FJ, Delamarter RB (1999) The outcome of lumbar discectomy in elite athletes. Spine 24:570–573

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, Hoogland T, Claes LE (1999) New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 24:755–762

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Zigler JE (2003) Clinical results with ProDisc: European experience and U.S. investigation device exemption study. Spine 28:S163–S166

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Spine Center, OrthoCenter Munich, Harlachinger Str. 51, 81547, Munich, Germany

    Christoph J. Siepe, Karsten Wiechert, Andreas Korge & H. Michael Mayer

  2. Department of Orthopaedics, Ain Shams University, Faculty of Medicine, El-Demerdash University Hospital, Ramsis Street, Cairo, Egypt

    Mohamed F. Khattab

Authors
  1. Christoph J. Siepe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karsten Wiechert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohamed F. Khattab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andreas Korge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H. Michael Mayer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph J. Siepe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siepe, C.J., Wiechert, K., Khattab, M.F. et al. Total lumbar disc replacement in athletes: clinical results, return to sport and athletic performance. Eur Spine J 16, 1001–1013 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0257-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0257-y

Keywords

  • Total disc replacement
  • Spine arthroplasty
  • Sports
  • Clinical results
  • Prospective studies