Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Back posture education in elementary schoolchildren: a 2-year follow-up study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within the scope of primary prevention regarding back functioning in children, research on the stability of intervention effects is indispensable. Along this line, the transition from childhood to adolescence is an important phase to evaluate the potential stability of intervention effects because of the typically mechanical and psychological demands related to adolescence. The main aim of the current study was to investigate the effects of a back education program at 2-year follow-up, in youngsters aged 13–14 years, on back posture knowledge, fear-avoidance beliefs and self-reported pain. An additional purpose was to evaluate which aspects of postural behavior were integrated in youngsters’ lifestyles. At 2-year follow-up, the study sample included 94 secondary schoolchildren in the intervention group (mean age 13.3 ± 0.8 years) and 101 controls (mean age 13.2 ± 0.7 years). The back posture program that had been implemented for two school years consisted of back education and the stimulation of postural dynamism in the class through support and environmental changes. A questionnaire was completed comparable to the pretest, posttest and follow-up evaluations. The current study demonstrated at 2-year follow-up stability of the improved general (F = 1.590, ns) and specific (F = 0.049, ns) back posture knowledge in children who had received early back posture education. Back posture education did not result in increased fear-avoidance beliefs (F = 1.163, ns) or mounting back and/or neck pain reports (F = 0.001, ns). Based on self-reports for postural behavior, youngsters who had received the back posture program in the elementary school curriculum integrated crucial sitting and lifting principles conform to biomechanical favorable postural behavior. The steady intervention effects 2-year post-intervention demonstrated that intensive back posture education through the elementary school curriculum is effective till adolescence. Future research on the impact of early school-based back posture promotion in relation to the integration of back posture principles according to a biomechanical favorable lifestyle and back pain prevalence later in life is essential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balagué F, Troussier B, Salminen JJ (1999) Non-specific low back pain in children and adolescents: risk-factors. Eur Spine J 8:429–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brattberg G (2004) Do pain problems in young school children persist into early adulthood? A 13-year follow-up. Eur J Pain 8:187–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burton K, Clarke D, McClune D, Tillotson M (1996) The natural history of low back pain in adolescents. Spine 2:2323–2328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burton K (1996) Low back pain in children and adolescents: to treat or not. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 55:127–129

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cardon G, Balagué F (2004) Low back pain prevention’s effects in schoolchildren. What is the evidence? Eur Spine J 13:663–679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cardon G, De Clercq D, De Bourdeaudhuij I (2000) Effects of back care education in elementary schoolchildren. Acta Paediatr 89:1010–1017

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cardon G, De Bourdeaudhuij I, De Clercq D (2002) Back education efficacy in elementary schoolchildren: a one year follow-up study. Spine 27:299–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cardon G, De Bourdeaudhuij I, De Clercq D (2002) Knowledge and perceptions about back education among elementary school students, teachers, and parents in Belgium. J Sch Health 72:100–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Street JH, Hunt M, Barlow W (1996) Pitfalls of patient education. Limited success of a program for back pain in primary care. Spine 21:345–355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. COST B13 (2006) European guidelines for the management of low back pain. Eur Spine J 15 (Suppl 2):S125–S297

    Google Scholar 

  11. Feldman DE, Shrier I, Rossignol M, Abenhaim L (2001) Risk factors for the development of low back pain in adolescence. Am J Epidemiol 154:30–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Geldhof E (2006) Back functioning: the effectiveness of an intervention promoting good body mechanics in elementary schoolchildren. Doctoral thesis. Chapter 3.3—Back posture education in elementary schoolchildren: stability of 2-year intervention effects

  13. Geldhof E, Cardon G, De Bourdeaudhuij I, De Clercq D (2006) Effects of a two-school-year multi-factorial back education program in elementary schoolchildren. Spine 31:1965–1973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goubert L, Crombez G, De Bourdeaudhuij I (2004) Low back pain, disability and back pain myths in a community sample: prevalence and interrelationships. Eur J Pain 8:385–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Harreby M, Nygaard B, Jessen T, Larsen E, Storr-Paulsen A, Lindahl A, Fisker I, Laegaard E (1999) Risk factors for low back pain in a cohort of 1389 Danish school children: an epidemiologic study. Eur Spine J 8:444–450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jones MA, Stratton G, Reilly T, Unnithan VB (2004) A school-based survey of recurrent non-specific low-back pain prevalence and consequences in children. Health Educ Res 19:284–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones MA, Stratton G, Reilly T, Unnithan VB (2005) Biological risk indicators for recurrent non-specific low back pain in adolescents. Br J Sports Med 39:137–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Knight G, Noyes J (1999) Children’s behaviour and the design of school furniture. Ergonomics 42:747–760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Limon S, Valinsky LJ, Ben-Shalom Y (2004) Children at risk–risk factors for low back pain in the elementary school environment. Spine 29:697–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Linton S, van Tulder MW (2001) Preventive interventions for back and neck pain problems. What is the evidence? Spine 26:778–787

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mendez FJ, Gómez-Conesa A (2001) Postural hygiene program to prevent low back pain. Spine 26:1280–1286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Milanese S, Grimmer K (2004) School furniture and the user population: an anthropometric perspective. Ergonomics 47:416–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Murphy S, Buckle P, Stubss D (2004) Classroom posture and self-reported back and neck pain in schoolchildren. Appl Ergon 35:113–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Panagiotopoulou G, Christoulas K, Papanckolaou A, Mandroukas K (2004) Classroom furniture dimensions and anthropometric measures in primary school. Appl Ergon 35:121–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Parcells C, Stommel M, Hubbard R (1999) Mismatch of classroom furniture and student body dimensions. J Adolesc Health 24:265–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sjölie AN (2004) Persistence and change in non-specific low back pain—a 3-year prospective study. Spine 29:2452–2457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Balague F, Nordin M, Melot C (2002) A 2-year prospective longitudinal study on low back pain in primary school children. Eur Spine J 11:459–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Staes F, Stappaerts K, Lesaffre E, Vertommen H (2003) Low back pain in Flemish adolescents and the role of perceived social support and effect on the perception of back pain. Acta Paediatr 92:444–451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Steele EJ, Dawson AP, Hiller JE (2006) School-based interventions for spinal pain: a systematic review. Spine 31:226–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Troussier B, Tesniers C, Fauconnier J, Grison J, Juvin R, Phelip X (1999) Comparative study of two different kinds of school furniture among children. Ergonomics 42:516–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Walker BF (2000) The prevalence of low back pain: a systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 1998. J Spinal Disord 13:205–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wilke HJ, Neef P, Hinz B, Seidel H, Claes L (2001) Intradiscal pressure together with anthropometric data—a data set for the validation of models. Clin Biomech 16(Suppl 1):111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is part of a research project entitled: Sport, Physical Activity and Health (Sport, Beweging en Gezondheid), carried out by the Policy Research Centre, a consortium of researchers from the University of Louvain, Ghent University, and the Free University of Brussels, funded by the Flemish Government. The authors are grateful to the teachers and the youngsters for their cooperation in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greet Cardon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geldhof, E., Cardon, G., De Bourdeaudhuij, I. et al. Back posture education in elementary schoolchildren: a 2-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J 16, 841–850 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0227-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0227-4

Keywords

Navigation