European Spine Journal

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 339–346 | Cite as

The development of an evidence-based patient booklet for patients undergoing lumbar discectomy and un-instrumented decompression

  • A. H. McGregor
  • A. K. Burton
  • P. Sell
  • G. Waddell
Original Article


Post-operative management after lumbar surgery is inconsistent leading to uncertainty amongst surgeons and patients about post-operative restrictions, reactivation, and return to work. This study aimed to review the evidence on post-operative management, with a view to developing evidence-based messages for a patient booklet on post-operative management after lumbar discectomy or un-instrumented decompression. A systematic literature search produced a best-evidence synthesis of information and advice on post-operative restrictions, activation, rehabilitation, and expectations about outcomes. Evidence statements were extracted and developed into patient-centred messages for an educational booklet. The draft text was evaluated by peer and patient review. The literature review found little evidence for post-operative activity restrictions, and a strong case for an early active approach to post-operative management. The booklet was built around key messages derived from the literature review and aimed to reduce uncertainty, promote positive beliefs, encourage early reactivation, and provide practical advice on self-management. Feedback from the evaluations were favourable from both review groups, suggesting that this evidence-based approach to management is acceptable and it has clinical potential.


Advice Booklet Patient education Post-operative management Rehabilitation Review Spinal surgery 


  1. 1.
    Alaranta H, Hurme M, Einola S, Kallio V, Knuts L, Torma T (1986) Rehabilitation after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: results of a randomised clinical trial. Int J Rehabil Res 9:247–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brennan G, Shultz BB, Hood RS, Zahniser JC, Johnson SC, Gerber AH (1994) The effects of aerobic exercise after lumbar microdiscectomy. Spine 19:735–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burton AK, Waddell G (2002) Educational and informational approaches. In: Linton SJ (ed) New avenues for the prevention and management of chronic musculoskeletal pain and disability. Pain research and clinical management, vol. 12. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 245–258Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burton AK, Waddell G, Tillotson M, Summerton N (1999) Information and advice to patients with back pain can have a positive effect. Spine 24:2484–2491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carragee EJ, Helms E, O’Sullivan GS (1996) Are postoperative activity restrictions necessary after posterior lumbar discectomy? A prospective study of outcomes in 50 consecutive cases. Spine 21:1893–1897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carragee EJ, Han MY, Yang B, Kim DH, Kraemer H, Billys J (1999) Activity restrictions after posterior lumbar discectomy. A prospective study of outcomes in 152 cases with no postoperative restrictions. Spine 24:2346–2351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Christensen FB, Laurberg I, Bunger CE (2003) Importance of the Back-café concept to rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: a randomised clinical study with a 2 year follow up. Spine 28:2561–2569PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chumbley GM, Hall GM, Salmon P (2002) Patient controlled analgesia: what information does the patient want? J Adv Nurs 39:459–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coudeyre E, Poiraudeau S, Revel M, Kahan A, Drape JL, Ravaud P (2002) Beneficial effects of information leaflets before spinal steroid injection. Joint Bone Spine 69:597–603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coudeyre E, Rannou F, Coriat F, Brin S, Revel M, Poiraudeau S (2005) Impact of the back book on acute low back pain outcome. In: Presented to the international society for the study of the lumbar spine, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Coulter A (1998) Evidence based patient information. BMJ 317:225–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Coulter A, Entwistle V, Gilbert D (1998) Informing patients. King’s Fund Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Danielsen JM, Johnsen R, Kibsgaard SK, Hellevik E (2000) Early aggressive exercise for postoperative rehabilitation after discectomy. Spine 25:1015–1020PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dicken BJ, McGregor AH, Jamrozik KD (2005) Trends in the management of postoperative low back pain. J Bone Joint Surg 87-B(Suppl. I):38Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dickinson D, Raynor DK, Duman M (2001) Patient information leaflets for medicines: using consumer testing to determine the most effective design. Patient Educ Couns 43:147–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dolan P, Greenfield K, Nelson RJ, Nelson IW (2000) Can exercise therapy improve the outcome of microdiscectomy? Spine 15(25):1523–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Donceel P, Du Bois M (1998) Fitness for work after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study. Eur Spine J 7:29–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Donceel P, Du Bois M, Lahaye D (1999) Return to work after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a rehabilitation oriented approach in insurance medicine. Spine 24:872–876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eaden J, Abrams K, Shears J, Mayberry J (2002) Randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy of a video and information leaflet versus information leaflet alone on patient knowledge about surveillance and cancer risk in ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 8:407–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Entwistle VA, Watt IS (1998) Disseminating information about healthcare effectiveness: a survey of consumer health information services. Qual Health Care 7:124–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Filiz M, Cakmak A, Ozcan E (2005) The effectiveness of exercise programmes after lumbar disc surgery: a randomised controlled study. Clin Rehabil 19:4–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Garrud P, Wood M, Stainsby L (2001) Impact of risk information in a patient education leaflet. Patient Educ Couns 43:301–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    George CF, Walters WE, Nicholas JA (1983) Prescription information leaflets: a pilot study in general practice. Br Med J 287:1193–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gibson JN, Waddell G (2005) Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18(2):CD001352Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gibson JN, Grant IC, Waddell G (1999) The Cochrane review of surgery for lumbar disc prolapse and degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Spine 24:1820–1832PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Greenfield K, O’Neill C, Findlay G, Nelson RJ (2005) Health economic evaluation of a randomised clinical trial comparing lumbar microdiscectomy with conservative management. In: Proceedings of International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Häkkinen A, Ylinen J, Kautiainen H, Airaksinen O, Herno A, Tarvainen U, Kiviranta I (2003) Pain, trunk muscle strength, spinal mobility and disability following lumbar disc surgery. J Rehabil Med 35:236–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Häkkinen A, Ylinen J, Kautiainen H, Tarvainen U, Kirviranta I (2005) Effects of home strength training and stretching versus stretching alone after lumbar disc surgery: a randomised study with a 1 year follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:865–870PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hall H, McIntosh G, Melles T, Holowachuk B, Wai E (1994) Effect of discharge recommendations on outcome. Spine 19:2033–2037PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hawkey GM, Hawkey CJ (1989) Effect of information leaflets on knowledge in patients with gastrointestinal diseases. Gut 30:1641–1646PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hides JA, Richardson CA, Jull GA (1996) Multidius muscle recovery is not automatic after resolution of acute first episode low back pain. Spine 21:2763–2769PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Johannsen F, Remvig L, Kryger P, Beck P, Lybeck K, Larsen LH, Warming S, Dreyer V (1994) Supervised endurance exercise training compared to home training after first lumbar discectomy: a clinical trial. Clin Exp Rheumatol 12:609–614PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kahanovitz N, Viola K, Muculloch J (1989) Limited surgical discectomy and microdiscectomy. A clinical comparison. Spine 14:79–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kara B, Tulum Z, Acar U (2005) Functional results and the risk factors of reoperations after lumbar disc surgery. Eur Spine J 14:43–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kjellby-Wendt G, Styf J (1998) Early active training after lumbar discectomy. Spine 23:2345–2351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kjellby-Wendt G, Styf J, Carlsson SG (2001) Early active rehabilitation after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective, randomised study of psychometric assessment in 50 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 72:518–524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kjellby-Wendt G, Carlsson S, Styf J (2002) Results of early active rehabilitation 5–7 years after surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:404–409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Little P, Roberts L, Blowers H, Garwood J, Cantrell T, Langridge J, Chapman J (2001) Should we give detailed advice and information to patients with back pain: a randomised controlled factorial trial of a self-management booklet and doctor advice to take exercise for back pain. Spine 26:2065–2072PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Livesley PJ, Rider MA (1993) Joint replacement and patient education. Int Orthop 17(1):34–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Long DM (1992) Decision making in lumbar disc disease. Clin Neurosurg 39:36–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lorig KR, Laurent DD, Deyo RA, Marnell ME, Minor MA, Ritter PL (2003) Can a back pain email discussion group improve health status and lower health care costs? Arch Intern Med 162:792–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Magnusson ML, Pope MH, Wilder DG, Szpalski M, Spratt K (1999) Is there a rational basis for post-surgical lifting restrictions? 1. Current understanding. Eur Spine J 8:170–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Manniche C (1995) Assessment and exercise in low back pain: with special reference to the management of pain and disability following first-time lumbar disc surgery. Dan Med Bull 42:301–313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Manniche C, Asmussen K, Lauristen B, Vinterberg H, Karbo H, Abildstrup S, Fischer-Nielsen K, Krebs R, Ibsen K (1993) Intensive dynamic back exercises with or without hyperextension in chronic back pain after surgery for lumbar disc protrusion: a clinical trial. Spine 18:560–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Manniche C, Skall HF, Braendholt L, Christensen B, Christopherson L, Ellegaard B, Heilbuth A, Ingerslev M, Jorgensen OE, Larsen E, Lorentzen L, Nielsen CJ, Nielsen H, Windelin M (1993) Clinical trial of postoperative dynamic back exercises after first lumbar discectomy. Spine 18:92–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mannion AF, Dvorak J, Muntener M, Grob D (2003) A randomised trial of post-operative rehabilitation after surgical decompression of the lumbar spine: initial readings. In: Proceedings of International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mayer TG, Vanharanta H, Gatchel RJ, Mooney V, Barnes D, Judge L, Smith S, Terry A (1989) Comparison of CT scan muscle measurements and isokinetic trunk strength in postoperative patients. Spine 14:33–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    McClune T, Burton AK, Waddell G (2002) Whiplash associated disorders: a review of the literature to guide patient information and advice. Emerg Med J 19:499–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    McIntosh A, Shaw CF (2003) Barriers to patient information provision in primary care: patients’ and general practitioners’ experiences and expectations of information for low back pain. Health Expect 6:19–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    McGregor AH, Hughes SPF (2002) The evaluation of the surgical management of nerve root compression in low back pain patients: part 1—the assessment of outcome. Spine 27:1465–1470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    McGregor AH, Hughes SPF (2002) The evaluation of the surgical management of nerve root compression in low back pain patients: part 2—patient expectations and satisfaction. Spine 27:1471–1476PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ostelo RWJG, de Vet HCW, Waddell G, Kerckhoffs MR, Leffers P, van Tulder MW (2000) Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD003007. DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD003007Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ostelo RWJG, de Vet HCW, Vlaeyen JWS, Kerckhoffs MR, Berfelo WM, Wolters PMJC, van den Brandt PA (2003) Behavioural graded activity following first time lumbar disc surgery. Spine 28:1757–1765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ostelo RWJG, de Vet HCW, Waddell G, Kerckhoffs MR, Leffers P, van Tulder M (2003) Rehabilitation following first-time lumbar disc surgery. Spine 28:209–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ostelo RWJG, Goossens MEJB, de Vet HCW, van den Brandt PA (2004) Economic evaluation of a behavioural graded activity program compared to physical therapy for patient following lumbar disc surgery. Spine 29:615–622PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Roland M, Waddell G, Klaber Moffett J, Burton K, Main C, Cantrell T (1996) The back book. The Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Rompe JD, Eysel P, Zöllner J, Heine J (1999) Prognostic criteria for work resumption after standard lumbar discectomy. Eur Spine J 8:132–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Scheer SJ, Radack KL, O’Brien DR Jr (1996) Randomized controlled trials in industrial low back pain relating to return to work. Part 2. Discogenic low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77:1189–1197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Taylor MW (1989) Return to work following back surgery: a review. Am J Ind Med 16:79–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Taylor H, McGregor AH, Mehdi-Zadeh S, Richards S, Khan N, Alaghband-Zadeh J, Hughes SPF (2002) The impact of self-retaining retractors on the paraspinal muscles during posterior spinal surgery. Spine 27:2758–2762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Timm KE (1994) A randomized control study of active and passive treatments for chronic low back pain following L5 laminectomy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 20:276–286PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Turner JA, Erek M, Herron L, Deyo R (1992) Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine 17:1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Waddell G, Burton AK (2004) Concepts of rehabilitation for the management of common health problems. The Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Waddell G, Sell P, McGregor A, Burton K (2005) Your back operation. The Stationery Office, London, Scholar
  65. 65.
    Watkins RG IV, Williams LA, Watkins RG III (2003) Microscopic lumbar discectomy results for 60 cases in professional and Olympic athletes. Spine J 3:100–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    WHO (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health. World Health Organisation, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Yilmaz F, Yilmaz A, Merdol F, Parlar D, Sahin F, Kuran B (2003) Efficacy of dynamic lumbar stabilization exercise in lumbar microdiscectomy. J Rehabil Med 35:163–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Yorimitisu E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Hirabayashi K (2001) Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Spine 26:652–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Zhu X, Parnianpour M, Nordin M, Kahanovitz N (1989) Histochemistry and morphology of erector spinae muscle in lumbar disc herniation. Spine 14:391–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. H. McGregor
    • 1
  • A. K. Burton
    • 2
  • P. Sell
    • 3
  • G. Waddell
    • 4
  1. 1.Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Faculty of MedicineImperial College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Spinal Research UnitUniversity of HuddersfieldHuddersfieldUK
  3. 3.University of Leicester Hospitals NHS Trust and Queen’s Medical Centre Nottingham NHS TrustNottinghamUK
  4. 4.Unumprovident Centre for Psychosocial and Disability ResearchUniversity of CardiffCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations