Abstract
Accurate quantitative measurements of the spine are essential for deformity diagnosis and assessment of curve progression. There is much concern related to the multiple exposures to ionizing radiation associated with the Cobb method of radiographic measurement, currently the standard procedure for diagnosis and follow-up of the progression of scoliosis. In addition, the Cobb method relies on 2-D analysis of a 3-D deformity. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the clinical value of Ortelius800TM that provides a radiation-free method for scoliosis assessment in three planes (coronal, sagittal, apical), with simultaneous automatic calculation of the Cobb angle in both coronal and sagittal views. Analysis of the clinical value of the device for assessing spinal deformities was performed on patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, deformity angles ranging from 10° to 48°. Correlation between Cobb angles measured manually on standard erect posteroanterior radiographs and those calculated by Ortelius800TM showed an absolute difference between the measurements to be significantly less than ± 5° for coronal measurements and significantly less than ± 6° for sagittal measurements indicating good correlation between the two methods. The measurements from four independent sites and six independent examiners were not significantly different. We found the novel clinical tool to be reliable for following mild and moderate idiopathic curves in both coronal and sagittal planes, without exposing the patient to ionizing radiation. Considering the need for further validation of this new method, any change in treatment protocol should still be based on radiographic control.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adair IV, Van Wijk MC, Armstrong GW (1977) Moire topography in scoliosis screening. Clin Orthop 129:165–171
Beauchamp M, Labelle H, Grimard G et al (1993) Diurnal variation of Cobb angle measurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 18:1581–1583
Beekman CE, Hall V (1979) Variability of scoliosis measurement from spinal roentgenograms. Phys Ther 59:764–765
Bone CM, Hsieh GH (2000). The risk of carcinogenesis from radiographs to pediatric orthopedic patients. J Pediatr Orthop 20:251–254
Berrington de Gonzalez A, Darby S (2004) Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 363:345–351
Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG (1990) Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72:328–333
Cobb JR (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. AAOS Instr Course Lect 5:261–275
Dickson RA (1987) Scoliosis: how big are you? Orthopaedics 10:881–887
Dickson RA (1992) The etiology and pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Belg 58(suppl 1):21–25
Doody M, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, Hacker DG, Luckyanov N, Land CE (2000) Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the U.S. Scoliosis Cohort Study. Spine 25:2052–2063
Goldberg MS, Mayo NE, Levy AR, Scott SC, Poitras B (1998) Adverse reproductive outcomes among women exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation from diagnostic radiography for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Epidemiology 9:271–278
Levy AR, Goldberg MS, Mayo NE, Hanley JA, Poitras B (1996) Reducing the lifetime risk of cancer from spinal radiographs among people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 21:1540–1547
Levy AR, Goldberg MS, Hanley JA, Mayo NE, Poitras B (1994) Projecting the lifetime risk of cancer from exposure to diagnostic ionizing radiation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Health Phys 66:621–633
McCarthy RE (2001) Evaluation of the patient with deformity. In: Weinstein SL (ed) The pediatric spine: principles and practice, 2nd edn. J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, pp 144–153
Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, Kehl D, Cowie GH (1990) Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72:320–327
National Academy of Sciences. BEIR V Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiations (1990) Health effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. National Academy Press, Washington
Oxborrow NJ (2000) Assessing the child with scoliosis: the role of surface topography. Arch Dis Child 83:453–455
Prasad KN, Cole WC, Hasse GM (2004) Health risks of low dose ionizing radiation in humans: a review. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 229(5):378–382
Pruijs JE, Keessen W, van der Meer R, van Wieringen JC, Hageman MA (1992) School screening for scoliosis: methodological considerations. Part 1: External measurements. Spine 17:431–436
Pruijs JEH, Hageman MAPE, Kessen W, van der Meer R, van Wieringen JC (1994) Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis. Skeletal Radiol 23:517–520
Risser JC (1958) The iliac apophysis: an invaluable sign in the management of scoliosis. Clin Orthop 11:111–118
Ron E (2003) Cancer risks from medical radiation. Health Phys 85:47–59
Sahlstrand T (1986) The clinical value of Moire topography in the management of scoliosis. Spine 11:409–417
Thulborne T, Gillepsie R (1976) The rib hump in idiopathic scoliosis: measurement, analysis, and response to treatment. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 58:64–71
Zetterberg C, Hansson T, Lidstrom J et al (1983) Postural and time dependent effects on body height and scoliosis angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand 54:836–840
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ovadia, D., Bar-On, E., Fragnière, B. et al. Radiation-free quantitative assessment of scoliosis: a multi center prospective study. Eur Spine J 16, 97–105 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0118-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0118-8