Skip to main content

Back related outcome assessment instruments

Abstract

A literature review of the most widely used condition specific, self administered assessment questionnaires for low back pain had been undertaken. General and historic aspects, reliability, responsiveness and minimum clinically important difference, external validity, floor and ceiling effects, and available languages were analysed. These criteria, however, are only part of the consideration. Of similar importance are the content, wording of questions and answers in each of the six questionnaires and an analysis of the different score results. The issue of score bias is discussed and suggestions are given in order to increase the construct validity in the practical use of the individual questionnaires.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Baker D, Pynsent P, Fairbank J (1989) The Oswestry index revisited. In: Roland M, Jenner J (eds) Back pain: new approaches to rehabilitation and education. Manchester University Press, Manchester pp 174–186

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bigos SJ, Battie MC, Spengler DM, et al. (1991) A prospective study of work perceptions and psychosocial factors affecting the report of back injury. Spine 16(1):1–6

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bland J, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 8:307–310

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bombardier C (2000) Outcome assessment in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders. Summary and general recommendations. Spine 25:3100–3103

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bombardier C (2000) Spine focus issue introduction. Spine 25:3097–309

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Boscainos P, Sapkas G, Stilianesi E (1999) Clinical relevance of specific parameters isolatecd within the Oswestry and Roland Morris functional disability index. J Bone Jourl Surg [Br] 81(Suppl):239

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boscainos PJ, Sapkas G, Stilianessi E, et al. (2003) Greek versions of the oswestry and roland-morris disability questionnaires. Clin Orthop 411:40–53

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brooks R (1996) EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37(1):53–72

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Coste J, Le_Parc JM, Berge E, et al. (1993) [French validation of a disability rating scale for the evaluation of low back pain (EIFEL questionnaire)]. Rev Rhum Ed Fr 60(5):335–341

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Crohnbach L (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Daltroy LH, Cats_Baril WL, Katz JN, et al (1996) The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment instrument: reliability and validity tests. Spine 21(6):741–749

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Davidson M, Keating JL (2002) A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Physi Ther 82(1):8–24

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deyo R, Centor R (1986) Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis 39:897–906

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, et al. (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research A proposal for standardized use. Spine 23(18):2003–2013

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dionne CE, Von_Korff M, Koepsell TD, et al. (1999) A comparison of pain, functional limitations, and work status indices as outcome measures in back pain research. Spine 24(22):2339–2345

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dropsy R, Marty M (1994) Quality-of-life indexes for assessment of low-back-pain. Rev Rhum 61:S44–S48

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dubs L (1999) Everything was done---patient still not satisfied: introduction to evidence-based surgery.Swiss Surg 5(4):160–166

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dubs L (2000) Der score bias. Schweiz. Aertzeteitung 81(6):292–295

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dubs L (2000) The patient as expert---introduction to evidence-based orthopedics. Z Orthop 138(4):289–294

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Euroquol-Group (1990) Euroquol---a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16:199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fairbank J (1995) Use of Oswestry disability index (ODI). Spine 20(13):1535–1537

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, et al. (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66(8):271–273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fisher K, Johnson M (1997) Validation of the Oswestry low back pain questionnaire, its sensitivity as a measure of change following treatment and its realtionship with other aspects of the chronic pain experience. Physiother Theory Pract 22:61–80

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ (2001) A comparison of a modified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire and the Quebec back pain disability scale. Physi Ther 81(2):776–778

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Greenough CG, Fraser RD (1992) Assessment of outcome in patients with low-back pain. Spine 17(1):36–41

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Grimby G, Smedby B (2001) ICF approved as the successor of ICIDH. J Rehabil Med 33–5:193–194

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gronblad M, Hupli M, Wennerstrand P, et al. (1993) Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the pain disability index (PDI) and the Oswestry disability questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients. Clin J Pain 9(3):189–195

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gronblad M, Jarvinen E, Hurri H, et al. (1994) Relationship of the pain disability index (PDI) and the Oswestry disability questionnaire (ODQ) with three dynamic physical tests in a group of patients with chronic low-back and leg pain. Clin J Pain 10(3):197–203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hefti F (1996) Numerische “Scores” zur Evaluation von Behandlungsresultaten am Bewegungsapparat. Schweiz. Aerztezeitung 77:118–25

    Google Scholar 

  30. Holt AE, Shaw NJ, Shetty A, et al. (2002) The reliability of the low back outcome score for back pain. Spine 27(2):206–210

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hsieh CY, Phillips RB, Adams AH, et al. (1992) Functional outcomes of low back pain: comparison of four treatment groups in a randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 15(1):4–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Huskisson EC (1974) Measurement of pain. Lancet 2(7889):1127–1131

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Johansson E, Lindberg P (1998) Subacute and chronic low back pain. Reliability and validity of a Swedish version of the Roland and Morris disability questionnaire. Scand J Rehabil Med 30(3):139–143

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kahtri H, Greenough CG (2002) Minimum clinically important difference in the low back outcome score. Society of Back Pain Research, Leeds

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kopec JA, Esdaile JM (1995) Functional disability scales for back pain. Spine 20(17):1943–1949

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M, et al. (1995) The Quebec back pain disability scale. Measurement properties. Spine 20(3):341–352

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kovacs FM, Llobera J, Gil_Del_Real MT, et al. (2002) Validation of the spanish version of the Roland–Morris questionnaire. Spine 27(5):538–542

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kucukdeveci AA, Tennant A, Elhan AH, et al. (2001) Validation of the Turkish version of the roland–morris disability questionnaire for use in low back pain. Spine 26(24):2738–2743

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Leclaire R, Blier F, Fortin L et al (1997) A cross-sectional study comparing the Oswestry and Roland–Morris functional disability scales in two populations of patients with low back pain of different levels of severity. Spine 22(1):68–71

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Mannion A, Junge A, Fairbank J, et al. (2005) Development of a German version of the Oswestry disability index. Part 1: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mannion A, Junge A, Grob D, et al. (2005) Development of a German version of the Oswestry disability index. Part 2: Sensitivity. Eur Spine (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  42. McDowell I, Newell C (1996) The theoretical and technical foundations of health measurement. Measuring health. A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. Oxford University Press, Oxford pp 10–42

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mueller U, Duetz M, Roeder C, et al. (2004) Condition specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part I: Validation. Eur Spine J 13:301–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mueller U, Roeder C, Dubs L, et al (2004) Condition Specific Outcome Measures for low back pain Part II: Scale construction. Eur Spine J 13:314–324

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nusbaum L, Natour J, Ferraz MB, et al. (2001) Translation, adaptation and validation of the Roland-Morris questionnaire---Brazil Roland–Morris. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research = Revista Brasileira de Pesquisas Medicas E Biologicas/Sociedade Brasileira de Biofisica 34(2):203–210

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Padua R, Padua L, Ceccarelli E, et al. (2001) Cross-cultural adaptation of the lumbar North American Spine Society questionnaire for Italian-speaking patients with lumbar spinal disease. Spine 26(15):E344–E347

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Patrick DL, Deyo RA, Atlas SJ et al. (1995) Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine 20(17):1899–908-discussion 909

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Porst R (2000) Question wording---Zur Formulierung von Fragebogen-Fragen. ZUMA, Mannheim 2:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  49. Pose B, Sangha O, Peters A, et al. (1999) Validation of the North American Spine Society Instrument for assessment of health status in patients with chronic backache. Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Ihre Grenzgebiete 137(5):437–441

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Raspe HH (1997) Minimum requirements in medical expert assessment of occupational disability of patients with chronic nonspecific pain. Versicherungsmedizin 49(4):118–125

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Roese I, Kohlmann T, Raspe H (1996) Measuring functional capacity in backache patients in rehabilitation: a comparison of standardized questionnaires 35(2):103–108

  52. Roland M, Fairbank J (2000) The Roalnd–Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability index. Spine 25:3115–3124

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 8(2):141–144

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Schoppink LE, van_Tulder MW, Koes BW, et al. (1996) Reliability and validity of the Dutch adaptation of the Quebec Back pain disability scale. Phys Ther 76(3):268–275

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P, et al. (1996) Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland–Morris questionnaire. Physi Ther 76(4):359–365 discussion 66–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P, et al. (1994) Assessing change over time in patients with low back pain. Physi Ther 74(6):528–33

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Stratford PW, Binkley JM (1997) Measurement properties of the RM-18. A modified version of the Roland–Morris disability scale. Spine 22(20):2416–2421

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Streiner D, Normann G (1995) Health measurement scales. A Practical Guide to their Developement and Use. Oxford Medical Publications 2 edn. ISBN o-19–262670–1

  59. Taylor SJ, Taylor AE, Foy MA, et al. (1999) Responsiveness of common outcome measures for patients with low back pain. Spine 24(17):1805–1812

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Underwood MR, Barnett AG, Vickers MR (1999) Evaluation of two time-specific back pain outcome measures. Spine 24(11):1104–1112

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Van Tubergen A, Landewe R, Heuft-Dorenbosch L, et al. (2003) Assessment of disability with the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 62(2):140–145

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Ware JEJ, Sherbourne CD. (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Wiesinger GF, Nuhr M, Quittan M, et al. (1999) Cross-cultural adaptation of the Roland-Morris questionnaire for German-speaking patients with low back pain. Spine 24(11):1099–1103

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Zoega B, Karrholm J, Lind B (2000) Outcome scores in degenerative cervical disc surgery. Eur Spine J 9(2):137–143

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Urs Müller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Müller, U., Röder, C. & Greenough, C.G. Back related outcome assessment instruments. Eur Spine J 15 (Suppl 1), S25–S31 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-1054-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-1054-8

Keywords

  • Spine
  • Outcome
  • Assessment
  • Review
  • Low back pain