Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Morphologic comparison of cervical, thoracic, lumbar intervertebral discs of cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 04 April 2008

Abstract

The aim was to analyze the morphological differences of the intervertebral disc and endplates at different levels. Forty-five vertebral motion segments were obtained from the spine of nine 3 to 4-year-old cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). From every spine, five discs were sectioned (C5–C6, T3–T4, T9–T10, L2–L3, L4–L5). In all the groups, tissue samples were collected and sections were stained with Masson’s trichrome, Safranine-O and van Gieson’s connective tissue stain to analyze the intervertebral discs. Immunohistochemistry was performed, using specific antibodies to detect collagens I and II. The intervertebral disc height, the maximum nucleus pulposus height, the superior and inferior endplate heights were histomorphometrically measured and different indexes were calculated to compare the differences between specimens of the same animal and between discs of the same level, and finally the differences between groups of discs of different levels. There were no differences existing in annular fibers anchoring on the endplate between discs of different levels. A positive immune reaction for type I collagen was observed in the longitudinal ligaments and in the annular region adjacent to them. Collagen II immune reactivity was found in the annulus close to the nucleus pulposus, in the endplates and in the nucleus. There were no differences between discs of different levels in the collagen I and II localization. The height of the discs varied along the spine. The smallest value was measured in T3–T4, with a larger increase caudally than cranially. The highest value was measured in L2–L3. A cervical disc was 55% the height of a lumbar one. The endplate height increased along the length of the spine. The inferior EP was always higher than the superior. The study provides a detailed structural characterization of the intervertebral disc and may be useful for further investigations on the disc degeneration process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alini M, Roughley PJ, Antoniou J, Stoll T, Aebi M (2002) A biological approach to treating disc degeneration: not for today, but maybe for tomorrow. Eur Spine J 11:S215–S220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Benzel EC (1995) Biomechanics of spine stabilization: principles and clinical practice. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benneker LM, Heini PF, Alini M, Anderson SE, Ito K (2005) 2004 Young award winner: vertebral endplate marrow contact channel occlusions and intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 15(30):167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernick S, Cailliet R (1982) Vertebral end-plate changes with aging of human vertebrae. Spine 2:97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bibby SR, Jones DA, Lee RB, Yu J, Urban JPG (2001) The pathophysiology of the intervertebral disc. Joint Bone Spine 6:537–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boni M, Denaro V (1987) Anatomo-clinical correlations in cervical spondylosis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cassinelli EH, Hall RA, Kang JD (2001) Biochemistry of intervertebral disc degeneration and the potential for gene therapy applications. Spine J 3:205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Denaro V (1991) Stenosis of the cervical spine. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Palma AF, Rothman RH (1970) The intervertebral disc. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eurell JA, Kazarian LE (1986) The vertebral cartilaginous endplate of the preadult rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). A correlative scanning electron-and light-microscopic study. Spine 5:483–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fornasier VL, Garaffo G, Denaro L, Denaro V (2000) Intervertebral disc degeneration—an autopsy study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 10:159–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Francois RJ (1982) Three-dimensional architecture of lumbar intervertebral discs. Spine 5:522–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Freemont AJ, Watkins A, Le Maitre C, Jeziorska M, Hoyland JA (2002) Current understanding of cellular and molecular events in intervertebral disc degeneration: implications for therapy. J Pathol 4:374–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ganey TM, Meisel HJ (2002) A potential role for cell-based therapeutics in the treatment of intervertebral disc herniation. Eur Spine J Suppl 2:S206–S214

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grieve P (1988) Common vertebral joint problems. Churchill Livingstone, London

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hashizume H (1980) Three-dimensional architecture and development of lumbar intervertebral discs. Acta Med Okayama 34:301–314

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Humzah MD, Soames RW (1988) Review. Human intervertebral disc: structure and function. Anat Rec 4:337–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Inoue H (1981) Three-dimensional architecture of lumbar intervertebral discs. Spine 2:139–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Luk KD, Ruan DK, Chow DH, Leong JC (1997) Intervertebral disc autografting in a bipedal animal model. Clin Orthop 337:13–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Luk KD, Ruan DK, Lu DS, Fei ZQ (2003) Fresh frozen intervertebral disc allografting in a bipedal animal model. Spine 28:864–869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mercer S, Bogduk N (1999) The ligaments and annulus fibrosus of human adult cervical intervertebral discs. Spine 7:619–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nerlich AG, Schleicher ED, Boos N (1997) 1997 Volvo award winner in basic science studies. Immunohistologic markers for age-related changes of human lumbar intervertebral discs. Spine 24:2781–2795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nerlich AG, Boos N, Wiest I, Aebi M (1998) Immunolocalization of major interstitial collagen types in human lumbar intervertebral discs of various ages. Virchows Arch 1:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pooni JS, Hukins DW, Harris PF, Hilton RC, Davies KE (1986) Comparison of the structure of human intervertebral discs in the cervical, thoracic and lumbar regions of the spine. Surg Radiol Anat 3:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Prescher A (1998) Anatomy and pathology of the aging spine. Eur J Radiol 27:181–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Roberts S, Menage J, Urban JP (1989) Biochemical and structural properties of the cartilage end-plate and its relation to the intervertebral disc. Spine 2:166–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Roberts S, Menage J, Duance V, Wotton S, Ayad S (1991) 1991 Volvo award in basic sciences. Collagen types around the cells of the intervertebral disc and cartilage end plate: an immunolocalization study. Spine 9:1030–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Roberts S, Menage J, Eisenstein SM (1993) The cartilage end-plate and intervertebral disc in scoliosis: calcification and other sequelae. J Orthop Res 5:747–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schollmeier G, Lahr-Eigen R, Lewandrowski KU (2000) Observations on fiber-forming collagens in the anulus fibrosus. Spine 21:2736–2741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsuji H, Hirano N, Ohshima H, Ishihara H, Terahata N, Motoe T (1993) Structural variation of the anterior and posterior anulus fibrosus in the development of human lumbar intervertebral disc. A risk factor for intervertebral disc rupture. Spine 2:204–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vanichkachorn JS, Vaccaro AR (2000) Thoracic disk disease: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 3:159–69

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Francisco Forriol

    Present address: , Valle de Laciana 82, 28034, Madrid, Spain

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain

    Purificacion Ripalda & Francisco Forriol

  2. Orthopaedic Department, Universita Campus BioMedico, Rome, Italy

    Giuseppe Longo & Vicenzo Denaro

Authors
  1. Giuseppe Longo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Purificacion Ripalda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vicenzo Denaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francisco Forriol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Forriol.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0655-4

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Longo, G., Ripalda, P., Denaro, V. et al. Morphologic comparison of cervical, thoracic, lumbar intervertebral discs of cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis). Eur Spine J 15, 1845–1851 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0035-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0035-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation