Abstract
The unilateral transforaminal approach for lumbar interbody fusion as an alternative to the anterior (ALIF) and traditional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) combined with pedicle screw instrumentation is gaining in popularity. At present, a prospective study using a standardized tool for outcome measurement after the transforaminal lumber interbody fusion (TLIF) with a follow-up of at least 3 years is not available in the current literature, although there have been reports on specific complications and cost efficiency. Therefore, a study of TLIF was undertaken. Fifty-two consecutive patients with a minimum follow-up of 3 years were included, with the mean follow-up being 46 months (36–64). The indications were 22 isthmic spondylolistheses and 30 degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine. Thirty-nine cases were one-level, 11 cases were two-level, and two cases were three-level fusions. The pain and disability status was prospectively evaluated by the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and a visual analog scale (VAS). The status of bony fusion was evaluated by an independent radiologist using anterior–posterior and lateral radiographs. The operation time averaged 173 min for one-level and 238 min for multiple-level fusions. Average blood loss was 485 ml for one-level and 560 ml for multiple-level fusions. There were four serious complications registered: a deep infection, a persistent radiculopathy, a symptomatic contralateral disc herniation and a pseudarthrosis with loosening of the implants. Overall, the pain relief in the VAS and the reduction of the ODI was significant (P<0.05) at follow-up. The fusion rate was 89%. At the latest follow-up, significant differences of the ODI were neither found between isthmic spondylolistheses and degenerative diseases, nor between one- and multiple-level fusions. In conclusion, the TLIF technique has comparable results to other interbody fusions, such as the PLIF and ALIF techniques. The potential advantages of the TLIF technique include avoidance of the anterior approach and reduction of the approach related posterior trauma to the spinal canal.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker JK, Reardon PR, Reardon MJ, Heggeness MH (1993) Vascular injury in anterior lumbar spine surgery. Spine 18:2227–2230
Barrick WT, Schoffermann JA, Reynolds JB, Goldthwaite ND, Mc Keehen M, Keanay D, White AH (2000) Anterior lumbar fusion improves discogenic pain at levels of prior posterolateral fusion. Spine 25:853–857
Brantigan JW, Steffee AD, Lewis ML, Quinn LM, Persenaire JM (2000) Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system: two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial. Spine 25:1437–1446
Brislin B, Vaccaro AR (2002) Advances in posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Clin North Am 33:367–374
Buttermann G, Garvey T, Hunt A, Transfeld E, Bradford D, Boachie-Adjei O, Ogilvie J (1998) Lumbar fusion results related to diagnosis. Spine 23:116–127
Chitnavis B, Barbagallo G, Selway R, Dardis R, Hussain A, Gullan R (2001) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision disc surgery: review of 50 cases in which carbon fiber cages were implanted. J Neurosurg 95:190–195
Christensen FB, Bunger CE (1997) Retrograde ejaculation after retroperitoneal lower lumbar interbody fusion. Int Orthop 21:176–180
Enker P, Steffee AD (1994) Interbody fusion and instrumentation. Clin Orthop 300:90–101
Fairbanks JE, Couper JC, Davies JB (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273
Freeman BJ, Licina P, Mehdian SH (2000) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion combined with instrumented postero-lateral fusion: 5-year results in 60 patients. Eur Spine J 9:42–46
Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A, Swedisch Lumbar Spine Study Group (2001) 2001 Volvo award winner in clinical studies: lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trail from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 26:2521–2532
Hacker RJ (1997) Comparison of interbody fusion approaches for disabling low back pain. Spine 22:660–666
Hanley EN, David SM (1999) Current concepts review—lumbar arthrodesis for the treatment of back pain. JBJS 5:716–730
Harms JG, Jeszenszky D (1998) Die posteriore, lumbale, interkorporelle Fusion in unilateraler transforaminaler Technik. Orthop Traumatol 10:90–102
Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG, Eck JC, Murphy RB, Covington LA (2001) Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 26:567–571
Kaiser MG, Haid RW Jr, Subach BR, Miller JS, Smith CD, Rodts GE Jr (2002) Comparison of the mini-open versus laparoscopic approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective review. Neurosurgery 51:97–103
Kozak JA, O‘Brien JP (1990) Simultaneous combined anterior and posterior fusion. An independent analysis of a treatment for the disabled low-back pain patient. Spine 15:322–328
Kuslich S, Ulstrom CL, Griffith SL, Ahern JW, Dowdle JD (1998) The Bagby and Kuslich method of lumbar interbody fusion. History, technique, and 2-year follow-up results of a United States prospective, multicenter trail. Spine 23:1267–1279
Leufven C, Nordwall A (1999) Management of chronic disabling low back pain with 360 degrees fusion. Results from pain provocation test and concurrent posterior lumbar interbody fusion, posterolateral fusion, and pedicle screw instrumentation in patients with chronic disabling low back pain. Spine 24:2042–2045
Linson MA, Williams H (1991) Anterior and combined anteroposterior fusion for lumbar disc pain. A preliminary study. Spine 16:143–145
Little DG, Mac Donald D (1994) The use of the percentage change in Oswestry disability index score as an outcome measure in lumbar spinal surgery. Spine 19:2139–2143
Lowe TG, Tahernia AD, O‘Brien MF, Smith DA (2002) Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): indications, technique and two year results. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:31–38
Lowe TG, Tahernia AD (2002) Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Clin Orthop 394:64–72
Mandan S, Boeree NR (2002) Outcome of posterior interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolythic spondylolisthesis. Spine 27:1536–1542
Mayer HM (2000) The ALIF concept. Eur Spine J 9:35–43
Moskowitz A (2002) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Clin North Am 33:359–366
Niskanen RO (2002) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. A two-year follow-up of spine surgery patients. Scand J Surg 91:208–211
Okuyama K, Abe E, Suzuki T, Tamura Y, Chiba M, Sato K (1999) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective study of complications after facet joint excision and pedicle screw fixation in 148 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 70:329–334
Ray CD (1997) Threaded titanium cages for lumbar interbody fusions. Spine 22:667–680
Santos ERG, Goss DG, Morcom RK, Fraser RD (2003) Radiologic assessment of interboy fusion using carbon fiber cages. Spine 28:997–1001
Schofferman J, Slosar P, Reynolds J, Golthwaite N, Koestler M (2001) A prospective randomized comparison of 270 degrees fusion to 360 degrees fusion (circumferential fusions). Spine 26:E207–E212
Steward G, Sachs BL (1996) Patient outcome after reoperation on the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:706–711
Taylor VM, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Kreuter W (1994) Low back pain hospitalisation. Recent United States trends and regional variations. Spine 19:1207–1213
Tiusanen H, Seitsalo S, Osterman K, Soini J (1996) Anterior interbody lumbar fusion in severe low back pain. Clin Orthop 324:153–163
Tiusanen H, Seitsalo S, Ostermann K, Soini J (1995) Retrograde ejaculation after anterior interbody lumbar fusion. Eur Spine J 4:339–342
Wang JM, Kim DJ, Yun YH (1996) Posterior pedicular screw instrumentation and anterior interbody fusion in adult lumbar spondylolisthesis or grade one spondylolisthesis with segmental instability. J Spinal Disord 9:83–88
Weatherley CR, Pricked CF, O‘Brien JP (1986) Discogenic pain persisting despite solid posterior fusion. JBJS 68B:142–143
Weiner BK, Fraser RD (1998) Spine update lumbar interbody cages. Spine 23:634–640
Whitecloud TS, Roesch WW, Ricciardi JE (2001) Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior–posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis. J Spinal Disord 14:100–102
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hackenberg, L., Halm, H., Bullmann, V. et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results. Eur Spine J 14, 551–558 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0830-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0830-1