Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dynamic electrophysiological examination in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: Is it useful in clinical practice?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neurogenic claudication (NC) is typical of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). One suspected pathophysiological mechanism underlying NC is intermittent hypoxia of cauda equina fibres resulting from venous pooling, which may lead to ischaemic nerve conduction failure and to transient clinical and electrophysiological changes after exercise. The aim of this study was to evaluate the appearance of significant transient electrophysiological abnormalities after walking exercise in patients with LSS and to establish the contribution of dynamic electrophysiological examination in the differential diagnostics of patients with LSS. The study participants were 36 consecutive patients with LSS demonstrated by computed tomography (CT). The control groups included, respectively, 28 patients with diabetes mellitus and clinically manifested polyneuropathy, and 32 healthy volunteers. The LSS patients were divided into four subgroups based on the clinical severity of the disease (with respect to the presence or absence of NC in the history and pareses on neurological examination). Soleus H-reflex, tibial F-wave and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to abductor hallucis muscle were examined in all groups, before and after quantified walking on a treadmill. The electrophysiological parameters measured after an exercise treadmill test (ETT) in LSS patients and in both control groups were compared with the same parameters obtained before ETT. The study shows that the electrophysiological parameters reveal minimal but statistically significant changes after walk loading in patients with LSS (a prolongation of the minimal latency of the tibial F-wave and of the latency of the soleus H-reflex). The changes in these parameters were demonstrated not only in patients with NC but also in patients without NC. More pronounced changes were found in LSS patients exhibiting chronic lower extremity pareses. Conclusions: From among a large battery of electrophysiological tests, only the minimal latency of the tibial F-wave and the latency of the soleus H-reflex exhibit changes after walk loading in patients with LSS. These are minimal but statistically significant. Dynamic electrophysiological examination can illustrate the pathophysiology of NC in LSS, but from a practical point of view its contribution to the differential diagnostics of LSS or diabetic polyneuropathy is limited by an absence of established cut-off values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adamova B (2003) The importance of electrophysiological measurements in the diagnostics of lumbar spinal stenosis with emphasis on dynamic tests. Dissertation, Library of Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic

  2. Adamova B, Bednarik J, Smardova L, Moravcova E, Chvatalova N, Prokes B, Kadanka Z (2000) The association between cervical and lumbar spinal canal stenosis (in Czech). Ces Slov Neurol Neurochir 5:261–267

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adamova B, Vohanka S, Dusek L (2002) The contribution of an exercise treadmill test to diagnostics in patients with mild lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 11 (Suppl 1):54 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adamova B, Vohanka S, Dusek L (2003) Differential diagnostics in patients with mild lumbar spinal stenosis: the contributions and limits of various tests. Eur Spine J 12:190–196

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Airaksinen O, Herno A, Turunen V, Saari T, Suomlainen O (1997) Surgical outcome of 438 patients treated surgically for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 22:2278–2282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Altman DG (1991) Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman and Hall, London, p 611

  7. Arnoldi CC, Brodsky AE, Cachoix J et al (1976) Lumbar spinal stenosis and nerve root entrapment. Syndromes, definition, and classification. Clin Orthop 115:4–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Baramki HG, Steffen T, Schondorf R, Aebi M (1999) Motor conduction alterations in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis following the onset of neurogenic claudication. Eur Spine J 8:411–416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Berger AR, Sharma K, Lipton RB (1999) Comparison of motor conduction abnormalities in lumbosacral radiculopathies and axonal polyneuropathy. Muscle Nerve 22:1053–1057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hall S, Bartleson JD, Onofrio BM, Baker HL Jr, Okazaki H, O’Duffy JD (1985) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical features, diagnostic procedures, and results of surgical treatment in 68 patients. Ann Intern Med 103:271–275

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kondo M, Matsuda H, Kureya S et al (1989) Electrophysiological studies of intermittent claudication in lumbar stenosis. Spine 14:862–866

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. London SF, England JD (1991) Dynamic F waves in neurogenic claudication. Muscle Nerve 14:457–461

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Manganotti P, Zanette G, Tinazzi M, Polo A (1995) Dynamic F wave from lower limbs: value and clinical application. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 35:323–329

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ooi Y, Mita FK, Satoh Y (1990) Myeloscopic study on lumbar spinal canal stenosis with special reference to intermittent claudication. Spine 15:544–549

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pastor P, Valls-Sole J (1998) Recruitment curve of the soleus H reflex in patients with neurogenic claudication. Muscle Nerve 21:985–990

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Penning L (1992) Functional pathology of lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Biomech 7:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Porter RW (1996) Spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication. Spine 21:2046–2052

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Porter RW, Ward D (1992) Cauda equina dysfunction. The significance of two-level pathology. Spine 17:9-15

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schonstrom N, Lindahl S, Willen J et al (1989) Dynamic changes in the dimensions of the lumbar spinal canal: an experimental study in vitro. J Orthop Res 7:115–121

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sortland O, Magnaes B, Hauge T (1977) Functional myelography with metrizamide in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Radiol 355 [Suppl]: 42–54

  21. Tang LM, Schwartz MS, Swash M (1988) Postural effects on F wave parameters in lumbosacral root compression and canal stenosis. Brain 111:207–213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Deyo R (1992) Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: an attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine 17:1–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, London, p 765

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Internal Grant Agency of the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic (grant No. NF/5938–3)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Adamova.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adamova, B., Vohanka, S. & Dusek, L. Dynamic electrophysiological examination in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: Is it useful in clinical practice?. Eur Spine J 14, 269–276 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0738-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0738-9

Keywords

Navigation