Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Predictors of outcomes after posterior decompression and fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

No consensus has been reached regarding surgical management of degenerative spondylolisthesis. The optimal type of surgical procedure and surgical indications have not been precisely defined. In order to screen for predictors of outcome, we retrospectively studied patient outcomes after posterior decompression and fusion for isolated lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Twenty-four consecutive patients (age range 50–78 years) underwent primary surgery for isolated lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. The surgical procedure consisted of posterior decompression and pedicle screw instrumented fusion using autogeneous bone graft, with or without interbody fusion. Clinical and radiologic status were assessed using the Beaujon functional score and plain AP and lateral radiographs. A multivariate analysis was used to correlate the functional score increase with surgical procedure modifications and preoperative clinical and radiologic features in order to determine which of them led to better results. Eighteen patients completed the evaluation. Six others were lost to follow-up after a minimum of 0.87 years. Combining all the results, the mean follow-up was 2.87 years. The Beaujon score was improved in the 24 patients (P<0.001), and fusion was successful in all cases. Additional interbody fusion and preoperative leg pain were significantly correlated with larger score increase (P=0.016 and P=0.003). Posterior decompression and fusion is successful in treating lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. From this study, circumferential fusion improves the outcomes and leg pain is a fair indication for surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Eisenberg BA et al. (1999) Minimum 5-year results of degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and instrumented posterior fusion. Spine 24:1721–1727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brantigan J, Steffee A (1993) A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-years clinical results in the first 26 patients. Spine 18:2106–2117

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bridwell KH, Sedgewick TA, O’Brien MF et al. (1993) The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 6:461–472

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown M, Holmes D, Heiner A (2002) Measurement of cadaver lumbar spine motion segment stiffness. Spine 27:918–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cauchoix J, Benoist M, Chassaing V (1976) Degenerative spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop 122–129

  6. Christensen F, Hansen E, Eiskjaer S et al. (2002) Circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with Brantigan cage versus posterolateral fusion with titanium Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Spine 27:2674–2683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dai LY (2001) Orientation and tropism of lumbar facet joints in degenerative spondylolisthesis. Int Orthop 25:40–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dall BE, Rowe DE (1985) Degenerative spondylolisthesis. Its surgical management. Spine 10:668–672

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Farfan HF (1980) The pathological anatomy of degenerative spondylolisthesis. A cadaver study. Spine 5:412–418

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Feffer HL, Wiesel SW, Cuckler JM et al. (1985) Degenerative spondylolisthesis. To fuse or not to fuse. Spine 10:287–289

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN et al. (1997) 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine 22:2807–2812

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fitzgerald JA, Newman PH (1976) Degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 58:184–192

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fujiya M, Saita M, Kaneda K et al. (1990) Clinical study on stability of combined distraction and compression rod instrumentation with posterolateral fusion for unstable degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 15:1216–1222

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goutallier D, Djian P, Borgese MA et al. (2001) [Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: outcome after isolated intersomatic arthrodesis]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87:569–578

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grobler LJ, Robertson PA, Novotny JE et al. (1993) Etiology of spondylolisthesis. Assessment of the role played by lumbar facet joint morphology. Spine 18:80–91

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Guigui P, Lambert P, Lassale B et al. (1997) [Long-term outcome at adjacent levels of lumbar arthrodesis]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 83:685–696

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guigui P, Rillardon L, Veil-Picard A et al. (2002) [Validation of a self-administered functional evaluation questionnaire after surgical treatment of lumbar spine stenosis]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 88:601–612

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hartz A, Marsh JL (2003) Methodologic issues in observational studies. Clin Orthop 33–42

  19. Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT (1991) Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 73:802–808

    Google Scholar 

  20. Herron LD, Trippi AC (1989) L4–5 degenerative spondylolisthesis. The results of treatment by decompressive laminectomy without fusion. Spine 14:534–538

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Inoue S, Watanabe T, Goto S et al. (1988) Degenerative spondylolisthesis. Pathophysiology and results of anterior interbody fusion. Clin Orthop 227:90–98

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Junghans H (1930) Spondylolisthesen ohne Spalt im Zwischengelenkstück. Archiv für Orthopädische und Unfall-Chirurgie 29:118–127

  23. Kim SS, Denis F, Lonstein JE et al. (1990) Factors affecting fusion rate in adult spondylolisthesis. Spine 15:979–984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kimura I, Shingu H, Murata M et al. (2001) Lumbar posterolateral fusion alone or with transpedicular instrumentation in L4–L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord 14:301–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kinoshita T, Ohki I, Roth KR et al. (2001) Results of degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with posterior decompression alone via a new surgical approach. J Neurosurg 95:11–16

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Konno S, Kikuchi S (2000) Prospective study of surgical treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison between decompression alone and decompression with Graf system stabilization. Spine 25:1533–1537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lassale B, Deburge A, Benoist M (1985) Résultats à long terme du traitement chirurgical des sténoses lombaires. Rev Rhum Mal Ostéoartic 52:27–33

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lee TC (1994) Reduction and stabilization without laminectomy for unstable degenerative spondylolisthesis: a preliminary report. Neurosurgery 35:1072–1076

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Leong J, Chun S, Grange W et al. (1983) Long-term results of lumbar intervertebral disc prolapse. Spine 8:793–799

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Madan S, Boeree N (2002) Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine 24:1536–1542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Morizono Y et al. (1990) Natural history of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Pathogenesis and natural course of the slippage. Spine 15:1204–1210

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. McNab I (1950) Spondylolisthesis with an intact neural arch. J Bone Joint Surg 32:325

    Google Scholar 

  33. Meyerding H (1932) Spondylolisthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 54:371–378

    Google Scholar 

  34. Miyakoshi N, Abe E, Shimada Y et al. (2000) Outcome of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and postoperative intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to the fusion. Spine 25:1837–1842

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mochida J, Suzuki K, Chiba M (1999) How to stabilize a single level lesion of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop 126–134

  36. Morgan F, King T (1957) Primary instability of lumbar vertebrae as a common cause of low back pain. J Bone Joint Surg 39-B:6–22

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nataga H, Schendel M, Transfeldt E et al. (1993) The effect of immobilization of long segments of the spine on the adjacent and distal facet force and lumbosacral motion. Spine 18:2471–2490

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Niemcryck S, Kraus T, Mallory T (1990) Empirical considerations in orthopaedic surgery research design and data analysis. Part III: multivariable analysis. J Arthroplasty 5:111–115

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nordin J (1991) Spondylolisthesis par lyse isthmique, Spondylolisthesis dégénératif. In: Encyclopédie Médico Chirurgicale Appareil locomoteur. Elsevier, Paris, pp 15835–15840

  40. Nork SE, Hu SS, Workman KL et al. (1999) Patient outcomes after decompression and instrumented posterior spinal fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 24:561–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. O’Brien J, Boden S, Mc Lain R (1996) Lumbar disc disease with discogenic pain. What surgical treatment is most effective? Spine 21:1837–1838

    Google Scholar 

  42. Owens W, Felts J, Spitznagel E (1978) ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 49:239–243

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Penta M, Sandhu A, Fraser R (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of disc degeneration 10 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 20:743–747

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pope M, Hanley E, Matteri R et al. (1977) Measurement of intervertebral disc space height. Spine 2:282–286

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rosenberg NJ (1975) Degenerative spondylolisthesis. Predisposing factors. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 57:467–474

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ryan MD (1994) L4–5 degenerative spondylolisthesis in monozygous twins. Spine 19:985–986

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Saillant G, Lemoine J, Rolland E et al. (1997) Spinal instability: fact or fiction. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 64:605–618

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sanderson PL, Fraser RD (1996) The influence of pregnancy on the development of degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 78:951–954

    Google Scholar 

  49. Satomi K, Hirabayashi K, Toyama Y et al. (1992) A clinical study of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Radiographic analysis and choice of treatment. Spine 17:1329–1236

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Suk S, Lee C, Kim W et al. (1997) Adding posterior lumbar interbody fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Spine 22:210–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Takahashi K, Kitahara H, Yamagata M et al. (1990) Long-term results of anterior interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 15:1211–1215

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, 47 Boulevard de l’Hôpital 75013, Paris, France

    Marc-Antoine Rousseau, Jean-Yves Lazennec & Gérard Saillant

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 1533 Parnassus, San Francisco, CA, 94103, USA

    Elisa C. Bass

Authors
  1. Marc-Antoine Rousseau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jean-Yves Lazennec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elisa C. Bass
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gérard Saillant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Yves Lazennec.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rousseau, MA., Lazennec, JY., Bass, E.C. et al. Predictors of outcomes after posterior decompression and fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 14, 55–60 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0703-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0703-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation