The value of combining single photon emission computerised tomography and computerised tomography in the investigation of spondylolysis

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of combining single photon emission computerised tomography (SPECT) with reverse gantry computerised tomography (rg-CT) in the investigation of spondylolysis. Patient characteristics and imaging results in 118 patients, aged 8–44 years, with low back pain (LBP) were analysed. SPECT showed increased scintigraphic uptake in 80 patients, and spondylolysis was identified on rg-CT in 53. The Cohen Kappa ratio of 0.362 (95% CI: 0.198–0.526) suggests only fair agreement for the result of increased scintigraphic activity with the finding of spondylolysis on rg-CT. We conclude that these investigations give mutually exclusive information, which leads to four diagnostic categories. When there was increased scintigraphic activity on SPECT, 58.8% (95% CI: 48.0–69.5%) of patients had spondylolysis on rg-CT. With rest from provoking activities, these lesions may heal. We interpret the findings of increased scintigraphic activity, but no spondylolysis demonstrated on rg-CT as indicating a bone stress response. These also require rest from provoking activity to prevent a stress fracture developing. In this study, 84.2% (95% CI: 72.67–95.8%) of those patients without increased activity on SPECT had no spondylolysis identified on rg-CT. These patients may need further investigations such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to diagnose pathology, which typically does not involve the posterior elements—but rest from sport may not be so important. There were five patients in our study, without increased scintigraphic activity, but in whom bilateral chronic-appearing (wide separation, smooth sclerotic bone margins) spondylolyses were identified at L5. These all were anticipated from previous plain radiographs or MRI. This group will almost certainly not heal, and if the spondylolyses are the cause of pain these vertebrae will need stabilisation by surgery if physiotherapy fails.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Amato M, Totty WG, Gilula LA (1984) Spondylolysis of the lumbar spine: demonstration of defects and laminal fragmentation. Radiology 153:627–629

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Appleby A, Stabler J (1969) A new sign of spondylolisthesis. Clin Radiol 20:315–319

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Baker D, McHollick W (1967) Hereditary spondylolisthesis and spina bifida. J Bone Joint Surg Am 49A:507–513

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Baker DR, McHollick WJ (1956) Spondylolschisis and spondylolisthesis in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 38A:933–934

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Barr JS (1955) Spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 37A:878–880

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bellah RD, Summerville DA, Treves ST et al. (1991) Low-back pain in adolescent athletes: detection of stress injury to the pars interarticularis with SPECT. Radiology 180:509–512

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bradford DS, Iza J (1985) Repair of the defect in spondylolysis or minimal degrees of spondylolisthesis by segmental wire fixation and bone grafting. Spine 10:673–679

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Buck JE (1970) Direct repair of defect in spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 52B:432–437

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Collier BD, Johnson RP, Carrera GF et al. (1985) Painful spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis studied by radiography and single-photon emission computed tomography. Radiology 154:207–211

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Congeni J, McCulloch J, Swanson K (1997) Lumbar spondylolysis. A study of natural progression in athletes. Am J Sports Med 25:248–253

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Dubowitz B, Friedman L, Papert B (1987) The oblique cranial tilt view for spondylolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:421

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fredrickson BE, Baker D, McHolick WJ et al. (1984) The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:699–707

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Gardner MJ, Gardner SB, Winter PD (1991) Confidence Interval Analysis. Version 1.1. Br Med J, London

  14. 14.

    Grenier N, Kressel HY, Schiebler ML et al. (1989) Isthmic spondylolysis of the lumbar spine: MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 170:489–493

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hardcastle P, Annear P, Foster DH et al. (1992) Spinal abnormalities in young fast bowlers. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:421–425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Johnson DW, Farnum GN, Latchaw RE et al. (1989) MR imaging of the pars interarticularis. Am J Roentgen 52:327–332

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Jones DM, Tearse DS, el Khoury GY et al. (1999) Radiographic abnormalities of the lumbar spine in college football players. A comparative analysis. Am J Sports Med 27:335–338

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Krenz J, Troup JD (1973) The structure of the pars interarticularis of the lower lumbar vertebrae and its relation to the etiology of spondylolysis, with a report of a healing fracture in the neural arch of a fourth lumbar vertebra. J Bone Joint Surg Br 55:735–741

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Landis JR, Koch GC (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Libson E, Bloom RA (1983) Anteroposterior angulated view. A new radiographic technique for the evaluation of spondylolysis. Radiology 149:315–316

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Libson E, Bloom RA, Dinari G et al. (1984) Oblique lumbar spine radiographs: importance in young patients. Radiology 151:89–90

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lusins JO, Elting JJ, Cicoria AD et al. (1994) SPECT evaluation of lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Spine 19:608–612

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Markwalder TM, Saager C, Reulen HJ (1991) “Isthmic” spondylolisthesis—an analysis of the clinical and radiological presentation in relation to intraoperative findings and surgical results in 72 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir 110:154–159

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Morita T, Ikata T, Katoh S et al. (1995) Lumbar spondylolysis in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:620–625

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Nathan H (1959) Spondylolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 41A:303–320

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    O Sullivan PB, Phyty GD, Twomey LT et al. (1997) Evaluation of specific stabilizing exercise in the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiologic diagnosis of spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis. Spine 22:2959–2967

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Papanicolaou N, Wilkinson RH, Emans JB et al. (1985) Bone scintigraphy and radiography in young athletes with low back pain. Am J Roentgen 145:1039–1044

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Porter RW, Park W (1982) Unilateral spondylolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 64:344–348

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Roche GG, Rowe MB (1952) The incidence of separate neural arch and coincident bone variations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 34A:491–494

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ryan PJ, Evans PA, Gibson T et al. (1992) Chronic low back pain: comparison of bone SPECT with radiography and CT. Radiology 182:849–854

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Saifuddin A, Burnett SJ (1997) The value of lumbar spine MRI in the assessment of the pars interarticularis. Clin Radiol 52:666–671

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Standaert CJ, Herring SA (2000) Spondylolysis: a critical review. Br J Sports Med 34:415–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Steiner ME, Micheli LJ (1985) Treatment of symptomatic spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis with the modified Boston brace. Spine 10:937–943

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Van den Oever M, Merrick MV, Scott JH (1987) Bone scintigraphy in symptomatic spondylolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:453–456

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wiltse LL (1962) The etiology of spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 44A:539–559

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wiltse LL, Widell EH, Jackson DW (1975) Fatigue fracture: the basic lesion is isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 57:17–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Yano T (1967) Familial incidence of spondylolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 49B:390

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. L. Gregory.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gregory, P.L., Batt, M.E., Kerslake, R.W. et al. The value of combining single photon emission computerised tomography and computerised tomography in the investigation of spondylolysis. Eur Spine J 13, 503–509 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0696-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Spondylolysis
  • Single photon emission computer tomography
  • Computer assisted tomography
  • Athlete
  • Lumbar vertebrae