Skip to main content

Treatment and outcome of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas

Abstract.

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (dAVFs) are rare and often misdiagnosed entities. The choice between surgical treatment and embolization remains a matter of debate. We report on the cases of 18 patients (16 men, 2 women) with dAVF, who were treated surgically over an 11-year period. Patient age ranged from 32 to 84 years (mean 60 years). Six patients underwent embolization preoperatively. In three cases, angiography examinations failed to show feeding arteries on first examination at neuroradiological centers. Feeding arteries were at a different level than the fistula point in seven patients, two of them presenting with new anastomoses after embolization. Location of the fistula was midthoracic to lumbar. Seven patients were variously misdiagnosed with tumor, polyneuropathy, Guillain-Barré syndrome, syringomyelia, and knee disease. Clinical history was characterized by slowly progressive and fluctuating deterioration. Initial symptoms were mainly sensory loss and motor weakness, lasting for between 4 and 45 months before diagnosis (mean 15 months). Recurrent fistula after operation was found in one patient. In another patient, control angiography revealed a fistula at another level, and in a third, a fistula on the contralateral side. All three patients underwent reoperation. Temporary clinical deterioration was found in four patients, seven remained unchanged, and seven improved postoperatively. An attempt at embolization should be made following diagnostic angiography. Otherwise, surgery is our recommended treatment for spinal dural fistulas, as it has a lower failure rate. Because of the progressive natural course with severe deficits, we favor an early definitive treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

References

  1. Afshar JK, Doppman JL, Oldfield EH (1995) Surgical interruption of intradural draining vein as curative treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurosurg 82:196–200

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anson JA, Spetzler RF (1992) Classification of spinal arteriovenous malformations and implications for treatment. BNI Quarterly 8:2–8

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barnwell SL, Halbach VV, Higashida RT, Hieshima G, Wilson CB (1989) Complex dural arteriovenous fistulas. Results of combined endovascular and neurosurgical treatment in 16 patients. J Neurosurg 71:352–358

    Google Scholar 

  4. Behrens S, Thron A (1999) Long-term follow-up and outcome in patients treated for arteriovenous fistula. J Neurol 241:181-185

    Google Scholar 

  5. Biondi A, Merland JJ, Hodes JE, Pruvo JP, Reizine D (1992) Aneurysms of spinal arteries associated with intramedullary arteriovenous malformations. AJNR 13:913–922

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hassler W, Thron A, Grote EH (1989) Hemodynamics of spinal arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurosurg 70:360–370

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koenig E, Thron A, Schrader V, Dichgans J (1989) Spinal arteriovenous malformations and fistulae: clinical, neuroradiological and neurophysiological findings. J Neurol 236:260–266

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meisel HJ, Lasjaunias P, Brock M (1995) Modern management of spinal and spinal cord vascular lesions. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 38:138–145

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mironov A (1994) Pathogenetical consideration of spontaneous dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs). Acta Neurochir 131:45–58

    Google Scholar 

  10. Niimi Y, Berenstein A, Setton A (1997) Embolization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae: results and follow-up. Neurosurgery 40:675–683

    Google Scholar 

  11. Partington MD, Rufenacht DA, Marsh WR, Piepgras DG (1992) Cranial and sacral dural arteriovenous fistulas as a cause of myelopathy. J Neurosurg 76:615–622

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenblum B, Oldfield EH, Doppman JL, Di Chiro G (1987) Spinal arteriovenous malformations: a comparison of dural arteriovenous fistulas and intradural AVM's in 81 patients. J Neurosurg 67:795–802

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schrader V, Koenig E, Thron A, Dichgans J (1989) Neurophysiological characteristics of spinal arteriovenous malformations. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 29:169–177

    Google Scholar 

  14. Song JK, Vinuela F, Gobin P, Duckwiler GR, Murayama Y, Kureshi I, Frazee JG, Martin NA (2001) Surgical and endovascular treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: long-term disability assessment and prognostic factors. J Neurosurg (Spine 2) 94:199–204

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tacconi L, Lopez Izquierdo BC, Symon L (1997) Outcome and prognostic factors in the surgical treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. Br J Neurosurg 11:298–305

    Google Scholar 

  16. Westphal M, Koch C (1999) Management of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae using an interdisciplinary neuroradiological/neurosurgical approach: experience with 47 cases. Neurosurgery 45:451–458

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Schick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schick, U., Hassler, W. Treatment and outcome of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. Eur Spine J 12, 350–355 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-002-0487-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-002-0487-6

Keywords.

  • Spinal arteriovenous malformation
  • Spinal dural fistula
  • Surgical treatment