Skip to main content
Log in

Survivorship analysis of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

This study presents a survivorship analysis of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in the surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Between 1987 and 1995, a total of 133 patients with idiopathic scoliosis received posterior spine fusion and instrumentation with the CD system at our center. The patients' mean age at surgery was 16.5 years (range 11–43 years). The magnitude of the thoracic scoliosis averaged 62.7° (range 40°–125°) and that of the lumbar curve was 58.8° (range 40°–100°). On average, 12.2 segments were fused (range 8–17) and, excluding the rods, 14.1 implants were set for each patient (range 10–21). Survivorship analysis was carried out using the Kaplan-Meier method. Implant removal was considered the terminal event, or "death". The effect of several variables on survival rate was determined with the Cox regression method. The patients remained in the study for 56.7 months (range 2–120 months). One-hundred and ten patients were withdrawn ("censored"): 90 "alive" (did not require repeat surgery and attended follow-up control in 1997) and 20 "lost" (did not attend control in 1997). Twenty-three patients attained the terminal event of implant removal for a variety of reasons: acute infection (three cases), late infection (ten cases), implant failure requiring revision (six cases) and local pain (four cases). The survival rate was 95.5% at 3 months, 94.7% at 6 months, 93.9% at 1 year, 91.5% at 2 years, 82.2% at 5 years and 76.5% at 10 years. The magnitude of the curves, total number of implants and number of fused segments did not correlate with survival probability. A positive correlation was found between survival rate and correction loss between surgery and last control. A survival rate of 76.5% at 10 years is unexpectedly low. Current data suggest that the incapacity to maintain correction after initial surgery plays a major roll in the long-term evolution of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altman DG, Bland JM (1998) Time to event (survival) data. BMJ 317:468–469

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Antuña S, López-Fanjul JC, Paz J (1999) Late infections in idiopathic scoliosis treated with posterior instrumentation [in Spanish]. Rev Ortop Traumatol 43:18–22

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bland JM, Altman DG (1998) Survival probabilities (the Kaplan.Meier method). BMJ 317:1572–1580

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boos N, Marchesi D, Aebi M (1992) Survivorship analysis of pedicular fixation systems in the treatment of degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine: a comparison of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation and the AO internal fixator. J Spinal Disord 5:403–409

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Busquets R, Bago J, Villanueva C, Pellise F (1991) Treatment of idiopathaic scoliosis. Comparative study between Harrington and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation [in Spanish]. Rev Ortop Trauma 35:233–236

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clark C, Shufflebarger H (1999) Late-developing infection in instrumented idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 24:1909–1912

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook S, Asher M, Lai SM, Shobe J (2000) Reoperation after primary posterior instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 25:463–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J (1984) Nouvelle technique d'osteosynthese rachidienne segmentaire par voie posterieure. Rev Chir Orthop 70:489–494

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dorey F, Amstutz H (1989) The validity of survivorship analysis in total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:544–548

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dubousset J, Shufflebarger H, Wenger D (1994) Late "infection" with C-D instrumentation. Orthop Trans 18:121

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ebelke D, Asher M, Neff J, Kraker D (1991) Survivorship analysis of VSP spine instrumentation in the treatment of thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures. Spine 16:428–432

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guidera K, Hooten K, Weatherly W, Highhouse M, Castellvi A, Ogden J, Pugh L, Cook S (1993) Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Results in 52 patients. Spine 18:427–431

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Humke T, Grob D, Scheier H, Siegrist H (1995) Cotrel-Dubousset and Harrington instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of long-term results. Eur Spine J 4:280–283

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Baldus C, Blanke K (1992) Preventing decompensation in King type II curves treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Strict guidelines for selective thoracic fusion. Spine 17 [Suppl 8]:274–281

  15. Lenke L, Bridwell K, Baldus C, Blanke K, Schoeneker P (1992) Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:1056–1067

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lenke L, Bridwell K, Blanke K, Baldus C, Weston J (1998) Radiographic results of arthrodesis with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:807–814

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McAfee P, Weiland D, Carlow J (1991) Survivorship analysis of pedicle spinal instrumentation. Spine 16:422–427

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Richards B (1995) Delayed infections following posterior spinal instrumentation for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:524–529

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement.

The authors acknowledge Celine Cavallo for translating and preparing the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Bago.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bago, J., Ramirez, M., Pellise, F. et al. Survivorship analysis of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 12, 435–439 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-001-0374-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-001-0374-6

Keywords.

Navigation