Abstract
Tendon injury is one of the most common causes of wastage in equine. The superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT) gets affected the most, especially in the mid-metacarpal region. Several studies have focused on the grafting of severed SDFT, but no ideal grafting material has been approved for clinical application. The present study aimed to evaluate the grafting of the mid-metacarpal SDFT in donkeys with a double-layered polypropylene mesh clinically, ultrasonically, macro/microscopically. Clinically healthy adult donkeys (n = 24) were divided randomly and equally into two groups: control (C) and study (S) groups. Tenotomy was performed on all animals by excising a full-thickness segment from the mid-metacarpal SDFT. In the C group, a suture tenorrhaphy was performed. While in the S group, SDFT was grafted with the double-layered polypropylene mesh. The S group showed faster clinical improvements, and earlier appearance of normal newly formed tendinous tissue ultrasonically compared with the C group. Macroscopically, the grafted tendons showed a rapid restoration of normal color and consistency. Moreover, they had minimal peri-tendinous adhesions compared with the non-grafted tendons. Microscopically, the grafted tendons showed earlier vascularization and more mature collagen fibers compared with the non-grafted tendons. In the present study, we have succeeded to graft the gap of the mid-metacarpal SDFT of a donkey using the double-layered polypropylene mesh. This method is an economical way to accelerate the healing process of the SDFT and enhance the clinical recovery in donkeys.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdullah S (2015) Usage of synthetic tendons in tendon reconstruction. BMC Proceedings BioMed Central 9(Suppl 3):A68. https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-9-S3-A68
Agut A, Martínez ML, Sánchez-Valverde MÁ, Soler M, Rodríguez MJ (2009) Ultrasonographic characteristics (cross-sectional area and relative echogenicity) of the digital flexor tendons and ligaments of the metacarpal region in Purebred Spanish horses. Vet J 180:377–383
Al-Asadi RN, Mohammad AA (2018) A comparative study of using Kessler suture pattern versus polypropylene meshes implantation to repair tenotomized Achilles tendon in bucks. Iraqi J Vet Med 42:65–71
Bertone AL, Stashak TS, Smith FW, Norrdin RW (1990) A comparison of repair methods for gap healing in equine flexor tendon. Vet Surg 19(4):254–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950x.1990.tb01181
Birch H, Smith T, Poulton C, Peiffer D, Goodship A (2002) Do regional variations in flexor tendons predispose to site-specific injuries? Equine Vet J 34:288–292
Brown MP, Pool RR (1983) Experimental and clinical investigations of the use of carbon fiber sutures in equine tendon repair. J Am Vet Med Assoc 182(9):956–966
Davis C, Smith R (2006) Diagnosis and management of tendon and ligament disorders equine surgery, 3rd edn. WB Saunders Co, St Louis, p 1104
Eliashar E, Schramme MC, Schumacher J, Smith RKW, Ikada Y (2001) Use of a bioabsorbable implant for the repair of severed digital flexor tendons in four horses. Vet Rec 148(16):506–509. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.148.16.506
El-Shafaey E-SA, Karrouf GI, Zaghloul AE (2012) A comparative study evaluating three bioscaffold augmentation devices used for superficial digital flexor tenorrhaphy in donkeys (Equus asinus) by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography. J Equine Vet Sci 32:728–739
Gall TT, Santoni BG, Egger EL, Puttlitz CM, Rooney MB (2009) In vitro biomechanical comparison of polypropylene mesh, modified three-loop pulley suture pattern, and a combination for repair of distal canine Achilles’ tendon injuries. Vet Surg 38:845–851
Garcia T, Hornof WJ, Insana MF (2003) On the ultrasonic properties of tendon. Ultrasound Med Biol 29:1787–1797
Grant B, Cannon H, Rose J (1978) Equine tendinitis-results of 11 cases treated with autografts. Journal of Equine Medicine and Surgery 2:509–512
James R, Kesturu G, Balian G, Chhabra AB (2008) Tendon: biology, biomechanics, repair, growth factors, and evolving treatment options. J Hand Surg 33:102–112
Kasashima Y, Takahashi T, Smith R, Goodship A, Kuwano A, Ueno T, Hirano S (2004) Prevalence of superficial digital flexor tendonitis and suspensory desmitis in Japanese thoroughbred flat racehorses in 1999. Equine Vet J 36:346–350
Kim CW, Pedowitz RA (2003) Part A: graft choices and the biology of graft healing. In: Pedowitz RA, O’Connor J, Akeson W (eds) Daniel’s knee injuries. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 435–491
Liu C-F, Aschbacher-Smith L, Barthelery NJ, Dyment N, Butler D, Wylie C (2011) What we should know before using tissue engineering techniques to repair injured tendons: a developmental biology perspective. Tissue Eng B Rev 17:165–176
Lomas A et al (2015) The past, present and future in scaffold-based tendon treatments. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 84:257–277
Nezih S, Afsin U, Ugur K, Onder K (2006) Prevention of tendon adhesions by the reconstruction of the tendon sheath with solvent dehydrated bovine pericardium: an experimental study. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care 6:1467–1472
Padaliya N, Ranpariya J, Kumar D, Javia C, Barvalia D (2015) Ultrasonographic assessment of the equine palmar tendons. Vet World 8:208–212
Patterson-Kane JC, Firth EC (2009) The pathobiology of exercise-induced superficial digital flexor tendon injury in thoroughbred racehorses. Vet J 181:79–89
Ramesh R, Kumar N, Sharma A, Maiti S, Singh G (2003) Acellular and glutaraldehyde-preserved tendon allografts for reconstruction of superficial digital flexor tendon in bovines: part I—clinical, radiological and angiographical observations. J Veterinary Med Ser A 50:511–519
Saini NS, Mirakhur KK (2000) Clinical, haematological and biochemical observations following plasma and glycerin stored tendon allografting in equids. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 70(4):356–361
Strömberg B, Tufvesson G (1977) An experimental study of autologous digital tendon transplants in the horse. Equine Vet J 9:231–237
Swiderski J, Fitch R, Staatz A, Lowery J (2005) Sonographic assisted diagnosis and treatment of bilateral gastrocnemius tendon rupture in a Labrador retriever repaired with fascia lata and polypropylene mesh. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 18:258–263
Van der Harst M, Rijkenhuizen A (2000) The use of a polypropylene mesh for treatment of ruptured collateral ligaments of the equine metatarsophalangeal joint: a report of two cases. Vet Q 22:57–60
Vilar JM, Doreste F, Spinella G, Valentini S (2009) Double-layer mesh hernioplasty for repair of incisional hernias in 15 horses. J Equine Vet Sci 29:172–176
Weiss AB, Blazina ME, Goldstein AR, Alexander H (1985) Ligament replacement with an absorbable copolymer carbon fiber scaffold—early clinical experience. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 196:77–85
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the staff and workers of the Department of Veterinary Surgery, Assiut University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.M.A. Saleh performed all the operations in the study. E.A. Ahmed contributed to the study execution (macro/microscopic examinations). Both wrote the manuscript. S.K. Abdel-Ghaffar, S.M. Seleim, and M.A. Ali contributed to the study design and data analysis. All the authors read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed, and the study has been approved by the National Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assiut University, Egypt.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saleh, T.M., Ahmed, E.A., Abdel-Ghaffar, S. et al. Grafting with double-layered polypropylene mesh for gap healing of mid-metacarpal superficial digital flexor tendon in Equus asinus: clinical and pathological evaluations. Comp Clin Pathol 28, 825–832 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-019-02942-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-019-02942-x