Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

For a C 1 generic diffeomorphism if a bi-Lyapunov stable homoclinic class is homogeneous then it does not have weak eigenvalues. Using this, we show that such homoclinic classes are hyperbolic if it has one of the following properties: shadowing, specification or limit shadowing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Abdenur. Generic robustness of spectral decompositions. Ann.Sci.EcoleNorm. Sup. (4), 36(2) (2003), 213–224.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. F. Abdenur. Attractors of generic diffeomorphisms are persistent. Nonlinearity, 16(1) (2003), 301–311.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. F. Abdenur, C. Bonatti and L. Diaz. Non-wandering sets with non-emptyinteriors. Nonlinearity, 17(1) (2004), 175–191.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. F. Abdenur, C. Bonatti, S. Crovisier, L. Diaz and L. Wen. Periodic points and homoclinic classes. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 27(1) (2007), 1–22.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Abdenur and L. Diaz. Pseudo-orbit shadowing in the C 1 topology. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 17(2) (2007), 223–245.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Bonatti and S. Crovisier. Récurrence et généricité. Invent. Math., 158(1) (2004), 33–104.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Bonatti, S. Crovisier, L. Diaz and N. Gourmelon. Internal perturbations of homoclinic classes: non-domination, cycles, and self-replication. Preprint Arxiv.

  8. C.M. Carballo, C.A. Morales and M.J. Pacifico. Homoclinic classes for generic C 1 vector fields. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 23(2) (2003), 403–415.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Franks. Necessary conditions for stability of diffeomorphisms. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 158 (1971), 301–308.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. N. Gourmelon. AFrank’slemmathatpreservesinvariantmanifolds. Preprint Arxiv.

  11. S. Gan and D. Yang. Expansive homoclinic classes. Nonlinearity, 22(4) (2009), 729–733.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. B. Hasselblatt and A. Katok. Introduction to the modern theory of dynamical systems. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 54. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995).

  13. N. Haydn and D. Ruelle. Equivalence of Gibbs and equilibrium states for homeomorphisms satisfying expansiveness and specification. Comm. Math. Phys., 148(1) (1992), 155–167.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Hirsch, C. Pugh and M. Shub. Invariants manifolds. Lectures notes in Mathematics, 583 (1977), Springer-Verlag.

  15. R. Mañé. An ergodic closing lemma. Annals of Math., 116 (1982), 503–540.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Palis. A global perspective for non-conservative dynamics. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire, 22(4) (2005), 485–507.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Palis and W. de Melo. Geometric theory of dynamical systems. Anintroduction. Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1982. xii+198 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Pilyugin. Shadowing in dynamical systems. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1706. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999. xviii+271 pp.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Potrie. Generic bi-Lyapunov stable homoclinic classes. Nonlinearity, 23(7) (2010), 1631–1649.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Potrie and M. Sambarino. Codimension one generic homoclinic classes with interior. Bull. Braz. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 41(1) (2010), 125–138.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. E. Pujals and M. Sambarino. Homoclinic tangencies and hyperbolicity for surface diffeomorphisms. Ann. of Math. (2), 151(3) (2000), 961–1023.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. K. Sakai, N. Sumi and K. Yamamoto. Diffeomorphisms satisfying the specification property. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 138(1) (2010), 315–321.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Sambarino and J. Vieitez. On persistently expansive homoclinic classes. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 14 (2006), 465–481.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. K. Sigmund. Generic properties of invariant measures for Axiom A diffeomorphisms. Invent. Math., 11 (1970), 99–109.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Smale. Differentiable dynamical systems. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 73 (1967), 747–817.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. X. Wen, S. Gan and L. Wen. C 1-stably shadowable chain components are hyperbolic. J. Differential Equations, 246(1) (2009), 340–357.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Arbieto.

About this article

Cite this article

Arbieto, A., Carvalho, B., Cordeiro, W. et al. On bi-Lyapunov stable homoclinic classes. Bull Braz Math Soc, New Series 44, 105–127 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00574-013-0005-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00574-013-0005-y

Keywords

k]Mathematical subject classification

Navigation