Abstract
Empirical and taxonomic approaches are the two main methods used to assign plant mycorrhizal traits to species lists. While the empirical approach uses only available empirical information, the taxonomic approach extrapolates certain core information about plant mycorrhizal types and statuses to related species. Despite recent claims that the taxonomic approach is now almost definitive, with little benefit to be gained from further empirical data collection, it has not been thoroughly compared with the empirical approach. Using the most complete available plant mycorrhizal trait information for Europe and both assignment approaches, we calculate the proportion of species for each trait, and model environmental drivers of trait distribution across the continent. We found large degrees of mismatch between approaches, with consequences for biogeographical interpretation, among facultatively mycorrhizal (FM; 91% of species mismatched), non-mycorrhizal (NM; 45%), and to a lesser extent arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM; 16%) plant species. This can partly be attributed to the taxonomic precision of the taxonomic approach and the use of different AM, NM, and FM concepts. Our results showed that the extrapolations of the taxonomic approach do not consistently match with empirical information and indicate that more empirical data are needed, in particular for FM, NM, and AM plant species. Clarifying certain concepts underlying mycorrhizal traits and empirically describing NM, AM, and FM species within plant families can greatly improve our understanding of the biogeography of mycorrhizal symbiosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akhmetzhanova AA, Soudzilovskaia NA, Onipchenko VG, Cornwell WK, Agafonov VA, Selivanov IA, Cornelissen JHC (2012) A rediscovered treasure: mycorrhizal intensity database for 3000 vascular plant species across the former Soviet Union. Ecology 93:689–690
Brundrett M (2004) Diversity and classification of mycorrhizal associations. Biol Rev 79:473–495. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793103006316
Brundrett M, Tedersoo L (in press) Misdiagnosis of mycorrhizas and inappropriate recycling of data can lead to false conclusions. New Phytol. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15440
Brundrett MC (1991) Mycorrhizas in natural ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res 21171–313(21):171–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60099-9
Brundrett MC (2017) Global diversity and importance of mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal plants. In: Tedersoo L (ed) Biogeography of mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 533–556
Brundrett MC (2009) Mycorrhizal associations and other means of nutrition of vascular plants: understanding the global diversity of host plants by resolving conflicting information and developing reliable means of diagnosis. Plant Soil 320:37–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9877-9
Brundrett MC, Kendrick B (1988) The mycorrhizal status, root anatomy, and phenology of plants in a sugar maple forest. Can J Bot 66:1153–1173
Brundrett MC, Tedersoo L (2018) Evolutionary history of mycorrhizal symbioses and global host plant diversity. New Phytol in press. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14976
Bueno CG, Moora M, Gerz M, Davison J, Öpik M, Pärtel M, Helm A, Ronk A, Kühn I, Zobel M (2017) Plant mycorrhizal status, but not type, shifts with latitude and elevation in Europe. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 26:690–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12582
Chaudhary V, Rúa M, Antoninka A et al (2016) Mycodb, a global database of plant response to mycorrhizal fungi. Sci Data 3:160028
Cosme M, Fernández I, Van der Heijden MGA, Pieterse CMJ (2018) Non-mycorrhizal plants: the exceptions that prove the rule. Trends Plant Sci https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2018.04.004, 23, 577, 587
Delavaux CS, Smith-Ramesh LM, Kuebbing SE (2017) Beyond nutrients: a meta-analysis of the diverse effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plants and soils. Ecology 98:2111–2119. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1892
Dickie IA, Thomas MM, Bellingham PJ (2007) On the perils of mycorrhizal status lists: the case of Buddleja davidii. Mycorrhiza 17:687–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-007-0146-1
Dickson S (2004) The Arum–Paris continuum of mycorrhizal symbioses. New Phytol 163:187–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01095.x
Garnier E, Navas M-L, Grigulis K (2016) Plant functional diversity organism traits, community structure, and ecosystem properties. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Gerz M, Bueno CG, Zobel M, Moora M (2016) Plant community mycorrhization in temperate forests and grasslands: relations with edaphic properties and plant diversity. J Veg Sci 27:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12338
Gerz M, Guillermo Bueno C, Ozinga WA, Zobel M, Moora M (2018) Niche differentiation and expansion of plant species are associated with mycorrhizal symbiosis. J Ecol 106:254–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12873
Harley JL, Harley EL (1987) A checklist of mycorrhiza in the British flora. New Phytol 105:1–102
Hempel S, Gotzenberger L, Kuhn I et al (2013) Mycorrhizas in the Central European flora: relationships with plant life history traits and ecology. Ecology 94:1389–1399. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-1700.1
Janos DP (1980) Mycorrhizae influence tropical succession. Biotropica 12:56–64. https://doi.org/10.2307/2388157
Janos DP (2007) Plant responsiveness to mycorrhizas differs from dependence upon mycorrhizas. Mycorrhiza 17:75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-006-0094-1
Joy JB (2013) Symbiosis catalyses niche expansion and diversification. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 280:20122820
Kalwij JM, Robertson MP, Ronk A, Zobel M, Pärtel M (2014) Spatially-explicit estimation of geographical representation in large-scale species distribution datasets. PLoS One 9:e85306. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085306
Kattge J, Díaz S, Lavorel S et al (2011) TRY—a global database of plant traits. Glob Chang Biol 17:2905–2935. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02451.x
Kohout P (2017) Biogeography of ericoid mycorrhiza. In: Biogeography of mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Springer, pp 179–193
Kohout P, Sýkorová Z, Čtvrtlíková M, Rydlová J, Suda J, Vohník M, Sudová R (2012) Surprising spectra of root-associated fungi in submerged aquatic plants. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 80:216–235
Laliberté E (2017) Below-ground frontiers in trait-based plant ecology. New Phytol 213:1597–1603. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14247
Lambers H, Teste FP (2013) Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants: do non-mycorrhizal species at both extremes of nutrient availability play the same game? Plant Cell Environ 36:1911–1915. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12117
Lekberg Y, Rosendahl S, Pål AO (2015) The fungal perspective of arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization in ‘nonmycorrhizal’ plants. New Phytol 205:1399–1403. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13118
Luginbuehl LH, Oldroyd GED (2017) Understanding the arbuscule at the heart of endomycorrhizal symbioses in plants. Curr Biol 27:R952–R963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.042
Maherali H, Oberle B, Stevens PF, Cornwell WK, McGlinn DJ (2016) Mutualism persistence and abandonment during the evolution of the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Am Nat 188:E113–E125. https://doi.org/10.1086/688675
Manjarrez M, Christophersen HM, Smith SE, Smith FA (2010) Cortical colonisation is not an absolute requirement for phosphorus transfer to plants in arbuscular mycorrhizas formed by Scutellospora calospora in a tomato mutant: evidence from physiology and gene expression. Funct Plant Biol 37:1132–1142
Menzel A, Hempel S, Klotz S, Moora M, Pyšek P, Rillig MC, Zobel M, Kühn I (2017) Mycorrhizal status helps explain invasion success of alien plant species. Ecology 98:92–102
Menzel A, Hempel S, Manceur AM, Götzenberger L, Moora M, Rillig MC, Zobel M, Kühn I (2016) Distribution patterns of arbuscular mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plant species in Germany. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 21:78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2016.06.002
Moora M (2014) Mycorrhizal traits and plant communities: perspectives for integration. J Veg Sci 25:1126–1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12177
Orchard S, Standish RJ, Nicol D, Dickie IA, Ryan MH (2017) Sample storage conditions alter colonisation structures of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and, particularly, fine root endophyte. Plant Soil 4(12):35–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2867-4
Osborne OG, De-Kayne R, Bidartondo MI et al (2018) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi promote coexistence and niche divergence of sympatric palm species on a remote oceanic island. New Phytol 217:1254–1266. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14850
Peat HJ, Fitter AH (1993) The distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizas in the British flora. New Phytol 125:845–854
Peay KG (2016) The mutualistic niche: mycorrhizal symbiosis and community dynamics. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 47:143–164. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032100
Porcel R, Aroca R, Ruiz-Lozano JM (2012) Salinity stress alleviation using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 32:181–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0029-x
Read DJ, Perez-Moreno J (2003) Mycorrhizas and nutrient cycling in ecosystems—a journey towards relevance? New Phytol 157:475–492
Roche SA, Carter RJ, Peakall R, Smith LM, Whitehead MR, Linde CC (2010) A narrow group of monophyletic Tulasnella (Tulasnellaceae) symbiont lineages are associated with multiple species of Chiloglottis (Orchidaceae): implications for orchid diversity. Am J Bot 97:1313–1327
Selosse M-A, Schneider-Maunoury L, Martos F (2018) Time to re-think fungal ecology? Fungal ecological niches are often prejudged. New Phytol 217:968–972. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14983
Sikes B (2010) When do arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi protect plant roots from pathogens? Plant Signal Behav 5:763–765
Smith SE, Read DJ (2008) Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 3rd edn. Elsevier
Sondergaard M, Laegaard S (1977) Vesicular-arbuscular mychorrhiza in some aquatic vascular plants. Nature 268:232–233
Song Y, Chen D, Lu K, et al (2015) Enhanced tomato disease resistance primed by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Front Plant Sci 6:786
Swaty R, Michael HM, Deckert R, Gehring CA (2016) Mapping the potential mycorrhizal associations of the conterminous United States of America. Fungal Ecol. : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2016.05.005
Tedersoo L (2017) Biogeography of mycorrhizal symbiosis. Ecological Studies 230. Springer, Tartu, p 566
Tedersoo L, Brundrett MC (2017) Evolution of ectomycorrhizal symbiosis in plants. In: Tedersoo L (ed) Biogeography of mycorrhizal symbiosis. Springer, pp 407–467
Tester M, Smith SE, Smith FA (1987) The phenomenon of “nonmycorrhizal” plants. Can J Bot 65:419–431. https://doi.org/10.1139/b87-051
Trappe JM (1987) Phylogenetic and ecologic aspects of mycotrophy in the angiosperms from an evolutionary standpoint. In: Safir GR (ed) Ecophysiology of VA mycorrhizal plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp 5–25
Vega C de, Arista M, Ortiz PL, Talavera S (2011) Mycorrhizal fungi and parasitic plants: reply. Am J Bot 98:597–601. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1100036
Vierheilig H, Schweiger P, Brundrett M (2005) An overview of methods for the detection and observation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in roots†. Physiol Plant 125:393–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00564.x, 051021083431???
Wang B, Qiu YL (2006) Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants. Mycorrhiza 16:299–363
Waterman RJ, Bidartondo MI, Stofberg J, Combs JK, Gebauer G, Savolainen V, Barraclough TG, Pauw A (2011) The effects of above- and belowground mutualisms on orchid speciation and coexistence. Am Nat 177:E54–E68. https://doi.org/10.1086/657955
Willis KJ (2017) The state of the world’s plants report. UK, London
Zanne AE, Tank DC, Cornwell WK, Eastman JM, Smith SA, FitzJohn RG, McGlinn DJ, O’Meara BC, Moles AT, Reich PB, Royer DL, Soltis DE, Stevens PF, Westoby M, Wright IJ, Aarssen L, Bertin RI, Calaminus A, Govaerts R, Hemmings F, Leishman MR, Oleksyn J, Soltis PS, Swenson NG, Warman L, Beaulieu JM (2013) Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments. Nature 506:89–92. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12872
Zobel M, Davison J, Edwards ME, Brochmann C, Coissac E, Taberlet P, Willerslev E, Moora M (2018) Ancient environmental DNA reveals shifts in dominant mutualisms during the late Quaternary. Nat Commun 9:139. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02421-3
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, et al (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by grants from the Estonian Research Council (IUT 20-28) and the European Regional Development Fund (Centre of Excellence EcolChange). We thank Prof. Mark Brundrett and the editor (Prof. David Janos) for valuable suggestions. We are grateful to John Davison for valuable comments on the manuscript. C.G.B., M.G., M.Z., and M.M. planned and designed the research. C.G.B. and M.G. analyzed data and wrote the first draft; all authors contributed to the final version.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guillermo Bueno, C., Gerz, M., Zobel, M. et al. Conceptual differences lead to divergent trait estimates in empirical and taxonomic approaches to plant mycorrhizal trait assignment. Mycorrhiza 29, 1–11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-018-0869-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-018-0869-1