, Volume 28, Issue 8, pp 779–785 | Cite as

Effects of two contrasted arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal isolates on nutrient uptake by Sorghum bicolor under drought

  • Sarah Symanczik
  • Moritz F. Lehmann
  • Andres Wiemken
  • Thomas Boller
  • Pierre-Emmanuel CourtyEmail author
Short Note


Drought is a limiting factor for crop production, especially in arid and semi-arid climates. In this study, Sorghum bicolor plants were inoculated, or not, with Rhizophagus irregularis, an arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) strain typical for temperate climates, or Rhizophagus arabicus, a strain endemic to hyper-arid ecosystems. Plants were grown under well-watered or drought conditions in compartmented microcosms. Transpiration rates, plant growth, and nutrient uptake (using 15N as a tracer) were determined to assess the impact of drought stress on sorghum plants in AM symbiosis. Although AM colonization did not affect the bulk biomass of host plants, R. arabicus improved their transpiration efficiency and drought tolerance more than R. irregularis. Moreover, R. arabicus was able to extract more 15N from the soil under both water regimes, and AM-driven enhancement of the nitrogen and phosphorus content of sorghum, especially when water was limiting, was greater for R. arabicus-inoculated plants than for R. irregularis-inoculated plants. Our work demonstrates close links between AM hyphal phosphorus and nitrogen transport and uptake by AM plants for both AM fungal species. It also underscores that, under the drought stress conditions we applied, R. arabicus transfers significantly more nitrogen to sorghum than R. irregularis.


Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis Sorghum Drought Isotopes Nitrogen transfer 



We thank Mark Rollog and T. Kuhn for laboratory assistance and scientific support in the stable isotope lab.

Funding Information

This project was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant nos. 127563 to T. Boller, PZ00P3_136651 to P.-E. Courty, 130794 to A. Wiemken and the R’Equip grant no. 121258 to M. F. Lehmann and T. Boller)

Supplementary material

572_2018_853_MOESM1_ESM.docx (120 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 119 kb)


  1. Allen MF (2007) Mycorrhizal fungi: highways for water and nutrients in arid soils. Vadose Zone J 6:291–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araus JL, Slafer GA, Reynolds MP, Royo C (2002) Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: what should we bred for? Ann Bot-London 89:925–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aroca R, Ferrante A, Vernieri P, Chrispeels MJ (2006) Drought, abscisic acid and transpiration rate effects on the regulation of PIP aquaporin gene expression and abundance in Phaseolus vulgaris plants. Ann Bot-London 98:1301–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Augé RM (2001) Water relations, drought and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Mycorrhiza 11:3–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Augé RM, Toler HD, Saxton AM (2014) Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis alters stomatal conductance of host plants more under drought than under amply watered conditions: a meta-analysis. Mycorrhiza 25:13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Azcón R, Gómez M, Tobar RM (1996) Physiological and nutritional responses by Lactuca sativa L. to nitrogen sources and mycorrhizal fungi under drought conditions. Biol Fert Soils 22:156–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bárzana G, Aroca R, Paz JA, Chaumont F, Martinez-Ballesta MC, Carvajal M, Ruiz-Lozano JM (2012) Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis increases relative apoplastic water flow in roots of the host plant under both well-watered and drought stress conditions. Ann Bot-London 109:1009–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brito I, de Carvalho M, Goss MJ (2011) Summer survival of arbuscular mycorrhiza extraradical mycelium and the potential for its management through tillage options in Mediterranean cropping systems. Soil Use Manage 27:350–356Google Scholar
  9. Bryla DR, Duniway JM (1997) Effects of mycorrhizal infection on drought tolerance and recovery in safflower and wheat. Plant Soil 197:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Periera S (2003) Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant. Funct Plant Biol 30:239–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chaves MM, Oliveira MM (2004) Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. J Exp Bot 55:2365–2384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cho K, Toler H, Lee J, Ownley B, Stutz JC, Moore JL, Auge RM (2006) Mycorrhizal symbiosis and response of sorghum plants to combined drought and salinity stresses. J Plant Physiol 163:517–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gamborg OL, Wetter LR (1975) Plant tissue culture methods (OL Gamborg and LR Wetter, Eds.). Saskatoon, Sask.:National Research Council of Canada, Prairie Regional Laboratory.Google Scholar
  14. Jakobsen I, Abbott LK, Robson AD (1992) External hyphae of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with Trifolium subterraneum L. I: spread of hyphae and phosphorus inflow into roots. New Phytol 120:371–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Khalvati M, Hu Y, Mozafar A, Schmidhalter U (2005) Quantification of water uptake by arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae and its significance for leaf growth, water relations, and gas exchange of barley subjected to drought stress. Plant Biol 7:706–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Koegel S, Boller T, Lehmann MF, Wiemken A, Courty PE (2013) Rapid nitrogen transfer in the Sorghum bicolor-Glomus mosseae arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant Signal Behav 8:13–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koide R, Elliott G (1989) Cost, benefit and efficiency of the vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Funct Ecol 3:252–255Google Scholar
  18. Lekberg Y, Koide RT (2008) Effect of soil moisture and temperature during fallow on survival of contrasting isolates of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Botany 86:1117–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mahdieh M, Mostajeran A, Horie T, Katsuhara M (2008) Drought stress alters water relations and expression of PIP-type aquaporin genes in Nicotiana tabacum plants. Plant Cell Physiol 49:801–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Marulanda A, Porcel R, Barea JM, Azcón R (2007) Drought tolerance and antioxidant activities in lavender plants colonized by native drought-tolerant or drought-sensitive Glomus species. Microb Ecol 54:543–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McGonigle TP, Miller MH, Evans DG, Fairchild GL, Swan JA (1990) A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular arbuscular fungi. New Phytol 115:495–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Neumann E, George E (2004) Colonisation with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae (Nicol. & Gerd.) enhanced phosphorus uptake from dry soil in Sorghum bicolor (L.). Plant Cell Environ 261:245–255Google Scholar
  25. Neumann E, Schmid B, Römheld V, George E (2009) Extraradical development and contribution to plant performance of an arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis exposed to complete or partial rootzone drying. Mycorrhiza 20:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oehl F, Sieverding E, Mäder P, Dubois D, Ineichen K, Boller T, Wiemken A (2004) Impact of long-term conventional and organic farming on the diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Oecologia 138:574–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ouziad F, Wilde P, Schmelzer E, Hildebrandt U, Bothe H (2006) Analysis of expression of aquaporins and Na+/H+ transporters in tomato colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and affected by salt stress. Environ Exp Bot 57:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Parniske M (2008) Arbuscular mycorrhiza: the mother of plant root endosymbioses. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:763–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Bruggmann R, Dubchak I, Grimwood J, Gundlach H, Haberer G, Hellsten U, Mitros T, Poliakov A, Schmutz J, Spannagl M, Tang H, Wang X, Wicker T, Bharti AK, Chapman J, Feltus FA, Gowik U, Grigoriev IV, Lyons E, Maher CA, Martis M, Narechania A, Otillar RP, Penning BW, Salamov AA, Wang Y, Zhang L, Carpita NC, Freeling M, Gingle AR, Hash CT, Keller B, Klein P, Kresovich S, McCann MC, Ming R, Peterson DG, Mehboob-ur-Rahman, Ware D, Westhoff P, Mayer KFX, Messing J, Rokhsar DS (2009) The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 457:551–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Phillips JM, Hayman DS (1970) Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. T Brit Mycol Soc 55:158–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ruiz-Lozano JM (2003) Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and alleviation of osmotic stress. New perspectives for molecular studies. Mycorrhiza 13:309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ruiz-Lozano JM, Aroca R (2010) Modulation of aquaporin genes by the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in relation to osmotic stress tolerance. In: Seckbach J, Grue M (eds) Symbiosis and stress: joint ventures in biology, cellular origin, life in extreme habitats and astrobiology. Springer Science+Business Media, Dordrecht, pp 358–374Google Scholar
  33. Ruiz-Lozano JM, Azcon R, Gomez M (1995) Effects of arbuscular-mycorrhizal glomus species on drought tolerance: physiological and nutritional plant responses. Appl Environ Microb 61:456–460Google Scholar
  34. Ruiz-Lozano JM, Porcel R, Bárzana G, Azcón R, Aroca R (2012) Contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis to plant drought tolerance: state of the art. In: Aroca R (ed) Plant responses to drought stress. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 335–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ruiz-Lozano JM, Porcel R, Aroca R (2006) Does the enhanced tolerance of arbuscular mycorrhizal plants to water deficit involve modulation of drought-induced plant genes? New Phytol 171:693–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith SE, Read DJ (2008) Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  37. Staddon PL, Gregersen R, Jakobsen I (2004) The response of two Glomus mycorrhizal fungi and a fine endophyte to elevated atmospheric CO2, soil warming and drought. Glob Change Biol 10:1909–1921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Symanczik S, Blaszkowski J, Koegel S, Boller T, Wiemken A, Al-yahya’ei MN (2014) Isolation and identification of desert habituated arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi newly reported from the Arabian Peninsula. J Arid Land 6:488–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tobar RM, Azcón R, Barea JM (1994a) The improvement of plant N acquisition from an ammonium-treated, drought-stressed soil by the fungal symbiont in arbuscular mycorrhizae. Mycorrhiza 4:105–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tobar RM, Azcón R, Barea JM (1994b) Improved nitrogen uptake and transport from 15N-labelled nitrate by external hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhiza under water-stressed conditions. New Phytol 126:119–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zurich Basel Plant Science Center, Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Soil SciencesResearch Institute of Organic AgricultureFrickSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Environmental Sciences; Aquatic and Stable Isotope BiogeochemistryUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland
  4. 4.Agroécologie, AgroSupDijon, CNRS, INRAUniversité de Bourgogne Franche-ComtéDijonFrance

Personalised recommendations