Skip to main content
Log in

Compatible host/mycorrhizal fungus combinations for micropropagated sea oats: II. Field evaluation

  • Short Note
  • Published:
Mycorrhiza Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sea oats (Uniola paniculata L.) are the dominant plant in the pioneer coastal dunes of Florida and are widely used for dune restoration. DNA analysis has revealed significant ecotypic variation among Atlantic and Gulf coast populations of sea oats, but little is known about the diversity of the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) communities present in the dune systems. In a prior greenhouse study, we evaluated the functional diversity that exists among the AM fungal communities from divergent Florida dunes and selected effective host/AM fungus combinations for further study. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of these compatible combinations on the growth of sea oats planted at Anastasia State Recreation Area (AN) on the Atlantic coast and St. George Island State Park (SG) on the Gulf coast. Micropropagated sea oats from each site were inoculated with AM fungal communities also from AN and SG or a microbial filtrate control. The complete factorial of treatment combinations were grown in the greenhouse for 8 weeks and outplanted to the AN and SG field sites. After 1 year, root colonization was evaluated, and after 2 years, root colonization, shoot and root dry masses, and shoot- and root-P contents were determined. Overall, sea oats planted at AN had greater percent root colonization, shoot dry mass, and shoot-P content than those planted at SG. At AN, the local sea oat ecotype responded more to the fungal community from the same site relative to shoot dry mass and shoot-P content. At SG, the local fungal community produced larger plants with greater P content regardless of the origin of the host. We conclude that sea oat productivity is responsive to AM fungal ecotype as well as host ecotype, and fungal origin should therefore be taken into account when planning sea oat plantings on coastal dunes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Aldrich-Wolfe L (2007) Distinct mycorrhizal communities on new and established hosts in a transitional tropical plant community. Ecology 88:559–566 DOI 10.1890/05-1177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ames RN, Mihara KL, Bethlenfalvay GJ (1987) The establishment of microorganisms in vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal and control systems. Biol Fertil Soils 3:217–223 DOI 10.1007/BF00640633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boerner REJ (1990) Role of mycorrhizal fungus origin in growth and nutrient uptake by geranium. Am J Bot 77:483–489 DOI 10.2307/2444382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyetchko SM, Tewari JP (1995) Susceptibility of barley cultivars to vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Can J Plant Sci 75:269–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean RG (1983) Principles of beach nourishment. In: Kormar PD, Moore JR (eds) CRC handbook of coastal processes and erosion. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 217–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Jumpponen A, Claridge AW, Trappe JM, Lebel T, Claridge DL (2004) Ecological relationships among hypogeous fungi and trees: inferences from association analysis integrated with habitat modeling. Mycologia 96:510–525 DOI 10.2307/3762171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monzon A, Azcon R (1996) Relevance of mycorrhizal fungal origin and host plant genotype to inducing growth and nutrient uptake in Medicago species. Agric Ecosyst Environ 60:9–15 DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(96)01066-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36 DOI 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe DM, Sylvia DM (1991) Mechanisms of the vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal plant-growth response. In: Arora DK, Rai B, Mukerji KG, Knudsen GR (eds) Handbook of applied mycology. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 35–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Philman NL, Kane ME (1994) Micropropagation of Uniola paniculata L. (sea oats).. Hortscience 29:559

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranamukhaarachchi DG, Kane ME, Guy CL, Li QB (2000) Modified AFLP technique for rapid genetic characterization in plants. BioTechniques 29:858–866

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (2003) The SAS system for windows. SAS Inst, Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl PD, Smith WK (1984) Effects of different geographic isolates of Glomus on the water relations of Agropyron smithii. Mycologia 76:261–267 DOI 10.2307/3793102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl PD, Christensen M, Williams SE (1990) Population variation in the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae: uniform garden experiments. Mycol Res 94:1070–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sylvia DM (1986) Spatial and temporal distribution of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with Uniola paniculata L. in Florida foredunes. Mycologia 67:734–740

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvia DM (1989) Nursery inoculation of sea oats with vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and outplanting performance on Florida beaches. J Coastal Res 5:747–754

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvia DM (1994) Vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungi. In: Weaver RW, Angle JS, Bottomley PJ, Bezdicek D, Smith S, Tabatabai A, Wollum AG (eds) Methods of soil analysis, Part 2. Microbiological and biochemical properties. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 351–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvia DM, Burks JN (1988) Selection of a vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus for practical inoculation of Uniola paniculata. Mycologia 80:565–568 DOI 10.2307/3807859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sylvia DM, Jarstfer AG, Vosátka M (1993) Comparisons of species and formulations of mycorrhizal fungi on diverse Florida beaches. Biol Fertil Soils 16:139–144 DOI 10.1007/BF00369416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sylvia DM, Alagely AK, Kane ME, Philman NL (2003) Compatible host/mycorrhizal fungus combinations for micropropagated sea oats—I. Field sampling and greenhouse evaluations. Mycorrhiza 13:177–183 DOI 10.1007/s00572-003-0232-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Talukdar NC, Germida JJ (1994) Growth and yield of lentil and wheat inoculated with 3 Glomus isolates from Saskatchewan soils. Mycorrhiza 5:145–152 DOI 10.1007/BF00202347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valero-Aracama C, Wilson SB, Kane ME, Philman NL (2007) Influence of in vitro growth conditions on in vitro and ex vitro photosynthetic rates of easy- and difficult-to-acclimatize sea oats (Uniola paniculata L.) genotypes. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol, Plant 43:237–246 DOI 10.1007/s11627-006-9014-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse WW (1982) Coastal sand dunes of the U.S. In: Lewis RR (ed) Creation and restoration of coastal plant communities. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 1–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse WW, Seneca ED, Cooper AW (1968) Use of sea oats for dune stabilization in the southeast. Shore Beach 36:15–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu YG, Laidlaw AS, Christie P, Hammond MER (2000) The specificity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in perennial ryegrass-white clover pasture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 77:211–218 DOI 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00087-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Partial support for this project was provided by the Office of Sea Grant, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, US Department of Commerce (grant no. NA76RG0120). We thank Andy Ogram, Ioannis Ipsilantis, and Gyummo Ely Na for their support and technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abid Al Agely.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Al Agely, A., Sylvia, D.M. Compatible host/mycorrhizal fungus combinations for micropropagated sea oats: II. Field evaluation. Mycorrhiza 18, 257–261 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-008-0178-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-008-0178-1

Keywords