Skip to main content
Log in

Hydraulic conductance and water potential gradients in squash leaves showing mycorrhiza-induced increases in stomatal conductance

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mycorrhiza Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stomatal conductance (g s) and transpiration rates vary widely across plant species. Leaf hydraulic conductance (k leaf) tends to change with g s, to maintain hydraulic homeostasis and prevent wide and potentially harmful fluctuations in transpiration-induced water potential gradients across the leaf (ΔΨ leaf). Because arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbiosis often increases g s in the plant host, we tested whether the symbiosis affects leaf hydraulic homeostasis. Specifically, we tested whether k leaf changes with g s to maintain ΔΨ leaf or whether ΔΨ leaf differs when g s differs in AM and non-AM plants. Colonization of squash plants with Glomus intraradices resulted in increased g s relative to non-AM controls, by an average of 27% under amply watered, unstressed conditions. Stomatal conductance was similar in AM and non-AM plants with exposure to NaCl stress. Across all AM and NaCl treatments, k leaf did change in synchrony with g s (positive correlation of g s and k leaf), corroborating leaf tendency toward hydraulic homeostasis under varying rates of transpirational water loss. However, k leaf did not increase in AM plants to compensate for the higher g s of unstressed AM plants relative to non-AM plants. Consequently, ΔΨ leaf did tend to be higher in AM leaves. A trend toward slightly higher ΔΨ leaf has been observed recently in more highly evolved plant taxa having higher productivity. Higher ΔΨ leaf in leaves of mycorrhizal plants would therefore be consistent with the higher rates of gas exchange that often accompany mycorrhizal symbiosis and that are presumed to be necessary to supply the carbon needs of the fungal symbiont.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AM:

arbuscular mycorrhizal

k leaf :

leaf hydraulic conductance

g s :

stomatal conductance

ΔΨ leaf :

transpiration-induced water potential gradient, or drawdown, across the leaf

References

  • Allen MF (1982) Influence of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae on water movement through Bouteloua gracilis (H.B.K.) Lag ex Steud. New Phytol 91:191–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen MF, Smith WK, Moore TS Jr, Christensen M (1981) Comparative water relations and photosynthesis of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal Bouteloua gracilis H.B.K. New Phytol 88:683–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augé RM (2001) Water relations, drought and VA mycorrhizal symbiosis. Mycorrhiza 11:3–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augé RM (2000) Stomatal behavior of arbuscular mycorrhizal plants. In: Kapulnik Y, Douds DD (eds) Arbuscular mycorrhizas: physiology and function. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 201–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Augé RM, Moore JL, Cho K, Stutz JC, Sylvia DM, Al-Agely AK, Saxton AM (2003) Relating foliar dehydration tolerance of mycorrhizal Phaseolus vulgaris to soil and root colonization by hyphae. J Plant Physiol 160:1147–1156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Augé RM, Moore JL, Sylvia DM, Cho K (2004a) Mycorrhizal promotion of host stomatal conductance in relation to irradiance and temperature. Mycorrhiza 14:85–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Augé RM, Stodola AJW, Tims JE, Saxton AM (2001) Moisture retention properties of a mycorrhizal soil. Plant Soil 230:87–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augé RM, Sylvia DM, Park SJ, Buttery BR, Saxton AM, Moore JL, Cho K (2004b) Partitioning mycorrhizal influence on water relations of Phaseolus vulgaris into soil and plant components. Can J Bot 82:503–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augé RM, Toler HD, Moore JL, Cho K, Saxton AM (2007) Comparing contributions of soil versus root colonization to variations in stomatal behavior and soil drying in mycorrhizal Sorghum bicolor and Cucurbita pepo. J Plant Physiol 164:1289–1299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bryla DR, Duniway JM (1997) Growth, phosphorus uptake, and water relations of safflower and wheat infected with an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. New Phytol 136:581–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho K, Toler HD, Lee J, Ownley BH, Jean C Stutz JC, Moore JL, Augé RM (2006) Mycorrhizal symbiosis and response of sorghum plants to combined drought and salinity stresses. J Plant Physiol 163:517–528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan IR, Farquhar GD (1997) Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. In: Jennings DH (ed) Integration of activity in the higher plant. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 471–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar GD, Buckley TN, Miller JM (2002) Optimal stomatal control in relation to leaf area and nitrogen content. Silva Fenn 36:625–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks P (2006) Higher rates of leaf gas exchange are associated with higher leaf hydrodynamic pressure gradients. Plant Cell Environ 29:584–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khalvati MA, Hu Y, Mozafar A, Schmidhalter U (2005) Quantification of water uptake by arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae and its significance for leaf growth, water relations, and gas exchange of barley subjected to drought stress. Plant Biol 7:706–712

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield TA, Hetherington AM, Atkinson CJ (1990) Some current aspects of stomatal physiology. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 41:55–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radin JW (1984) Stomatal responses to water stress and to abscisic acid in phosphorus-deficient cotton plants. Plant Physiol 76:392–394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oparka KJ, Prior DAM (1992) Direct evidence of pressure-generated closure of plasmodesmata. Plant Journal 2:741–750

    Google Scholar 

  • Querejeta JI, Allen MF, Caravaca F, Roldan A (2006) Differential modulation of host plant delta C-13 and delta O-18 by native and nonnative arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a semiarid environment. New Phytol 169:379–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Lozano JM, Azcón R (1997) Effect of calcium application on the tolerance of mycorrhizal lettuce plants to polyethylene glycol-induced water stress. Symbiosis 23:9–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Lozano JM, Azcón R, Gomez M (1996) Alleviation of salt stress by arbuscular-mycorrhizal Glomus species in Lactuca sativa plants. Physiol Plant 98:767–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte PJ (1993) Tissue properties and water relations of desert shrubs. In: Smith JAC, Griffiths H (eds) Water deficits: plant responses from cell to community. Bios Scientific, Oxford, UK, pp 177–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Taiz L, Zeiger E (2006) Plant physiology, 4th edn. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyree MT, Cheung YNS (1977) Resistance to water flow in Fagus grandifolia leaves. Can J Bot 55:2591–2599

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Agricultural Experiment Station at the University of Tennessee. We are grateful to Casey Barrickman for nutrient analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert M. Augé.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Augé, R.M., Toler, H.D., Sams, C.E. et al. Hydraulic conductance and water potential gradients in squash leaves showing mycorrhiza-induced increases in stomatal conductance. Mycorrhiza 18, 115–121 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-008-0162-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-008-0162-9

Keywords

Navigation