Skip to main content
Log in

Wetland dicots and monocots differ in colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mycorrhiza Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As an initial step towards evaluating whether mycorrhizas influence composition and diversity in calcareous fen plant communities, we surveyed root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and dark septate endophytic fungi (DSE) in 67 plant species in three different fens in central New York State (USA). We found colonization by AMF and DSE in most plant species at all three sites, with the type and extent of colonization differing between monocots and dicots. On average, AMF colonization was higher in dicots (58±3%, mean±SE) than in monocots (13±4%) but DSE colonization followed the opposite trend (24±3% in monocots and 9±1% in dicots). In sedges and cattails, two monocot families that are often abundant in fens and other wetlands, AMF colonization was usually very low (<10%) in five species and completely absent in seven others. However, DSE colonization in these species was frequently observed. Responses of wetland plants to AMF and DSE are poorly understood, but in the fen communities surveyed, dicots appear to be in a better position to respond to AMF than many of these more abundant monocots (e.g., sedges and cattails). In contrast, these monocots may be more likely to respond to DSE. Future work directed towards understanding the response of these wetland plants to AMF and DSE should provide insight into the roles these fungal symbionts play in influencing diversity in fen plant communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addy HD, Hambleton S, Currah RS (2000) Distribution and molecular characterization of the root endophyte Phialocephala fortinii along an environmental gradient in the boreal forest of Alberta. Mycol Res 104:1213–1221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz T, Sylvia DM, Doren RF (1995) Activity and species composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi following soil removal. Ecol Appl 5:776–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey KM (2005) Hydrologic controls on phosphorus geochemistry in rich fens. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY

  • Bedford BL, Walbridge MR, Aldous A (1999) Patterns in nutrient availability and plant diversity of temperate North American wetlands. Ecology 80:2151–2169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohrer KE, Friese CF, Amon JP (2004) Seasonal dynamics of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in differing wetland habitats. Mycorrhiza 14:329–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brundrett M, Melville L, Peterson RL (1994) Practical methods in mycorrhizal research. Mycologue Publications, Sidney, BC

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell BA, Jumpponen A, Trappe JM (2000) Utilization of major detrital substrates by dark-septate, root endophytes. Mycologia 92:230–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell WK, Bedford BL, Chapin CT (2001) Occurrence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a phosphorus-poor wetland and mycorrhizal response to phosphorus fertilization. Am J Bot 88:1824–1829

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cross AF, Schlesinger WH (1995) A literature review and evaluation of the Hedley fractionation—applications to the biogeochemical cycle of soil phosphorus in natural ecosystems. Geoderma 64:197–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dunham RM, Ray AM, Inouye RS (2003) Growth, physiology, and chemistry of mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal Typha latifolia seedlings. Wetlands 23:890–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontenla S, Puntieri J, Ocampo JA (2001) Mycorrhizal associations in the Patagonian steppe, Argentina. Plant Soil 233:13–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Godwin KS, Shallenberger JP, Leopold DJ, Bedford BL (2002) Linking landscape properties to local hydrogeologic gradients and plant species occurrence in minerotrophic fens of New York State, USA: a hydrogeologic setting (HGS) framework. Wetlands 22:722–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP, Mackey JML, Hillier SH, Read DJ (1987) Floristic diversity in a model system using experimental microcosms. Nature 328:420–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartnett DC, Wilson GWT (1999) Mycorrhizae influence plant community structure and diversity in tallgrass prairie. Ecology 80:1187–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedley MJ, Stewart JWB, Chauhan BS (1982) Changes in inorganic and organic soil-phosphorus fractions induced by cultivation practices and by laboratory incubations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:970–976

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jayachandran K, Shetty KG (2003) Growth response and phosphorus uptake by arbuscular mycorrhizae of wet prairie sawgrass. Aquat Bot 76:281–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson NC, O’Dell TE, Bledsoe CS (1999) Methods for ecological study of mycorrhizae. In: Robertson GP, Coleman DC, Bledsoe CS, Sollins P (eds) Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 378–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Jumpponen A, Trappe JM (1998) Dark septate endophytes: a review of facultative biotrophic root-colonizing fungi. New Phytol 140:295–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jumpponen A (2001) Dark septate endophytes—are they mycorrhizal? Mycorrhiza 11:207–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan AG (1974) Occurrence of mycorrhizas in halophytes, hydrophytes, and xerophytes, and of endogone species in adjacent soils. J Gen Microbio 81:7–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen J, Kytoviita MM, Siikamaki P (2004) Are resources allocated differently to symbiosis and reproduction in Geranium sylvaticum under different light conditions? Can J Bot 82:89–95

    Google Scholar 

  • McGonigle TP, Miller MH, Evans DG, Fairchild GL, Swan JA (1990) A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol 115:495–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RM, Smith CI, Jastrow JD, Bever JD (1999) Mycorrhizal status of the genus Carex (Cyperaceae). Am J Bot 86:547–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller SP, Sharitz RR (2000) Manipulation of flooding and arbuscular mycorrhiza formation influences growth and nutrition of two semiaquatic grass species. Funct Ecol 14:738–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthukumar T, Udaiyan K, Shanmughavel P (2004) Mycorrhiza in sedges—an overview. Mycorrhiza 14:65–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peat HJ, Fitter AH (1993) The distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizae in the British flora. New Phytol 125:845–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson RL, Massicotte HB, Melville LH (2004) Mycorrhizas: anatomy and cell biology. NRC Research Press, National Research Council of Canada Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell CL (1975) Rushes and sedges are non-mycotrophic. Plant Soil 42:481–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read DJ, Haselwandter K (1981) Observations on the mycorrhizal status of some alpine plant communities. New Phytol 88:341–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruotsalainen AL, Vare H, Vestberg M (2002) Seasonality of root fungal colonization in low-alpine herbs. Mycorrhiza 12:29–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SE, Read DJ (1997) Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thormann MN, Currah RS, Bayley SE (1999) The mycorrhizal status of the dominant vegetation along a peatland gradient in southern boreal Alberta, Canada. Wetlands 19:438–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner SD, Amon JP, Schneble RM, Friese CF (2000) Mycorrhizal fungi associated with plants in ground-water fed wetlands. Wetlands 20:200–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urcelay C, Diaz S (2003) The mycorrhizal dependence of subordinates determines the effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant diversity. Ecol Lett 6:388–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA, NRCS (2005) The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5 (http://plants.usda.gov). Data compiled from various sources by Mark W. Skinner. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490, USA

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (1996) National list of vascular plant species that occur in wetlands. National Wetlands Inventory, St. Petersburg, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden MGA (2002) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as a determinant of plant diversity: in search of underlying mechanisms and general principles. In: van der Heijden MGA, Sanders IR (eds) Mycorrhizal ecology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 243–265

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden MGA, Klironomos JN, Ursic M, Moutoglis P, Streitwolf-Engel R, Boller T, Wiemken A, Sanders IR (1998) Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature 396:69–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vierheilig H, Coughlan AP, Wyss U, Piche Y (1998) Ink and vinegar, a simple staining technique for arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:5004–5007

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Weishampel PA (2005) Distribution and function of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in calcareous fen plant communities. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY

  • Wetzel PR, van der Valk AG (1996) Vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizae in prairie pothole wetland vegetation in Iowa and North Dakota. Can J Bot 74:883–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for comments made by Ben Wolfe, Tim Fahey, Janice Thies, and anonymous reviewers on earlier drafts of this manuscript. Additionally, we are thankful for the help of several Cornell University undergraduates for their help in the laboratory and the field: Sara Alcorn, Julie Baribeau, Cristen Mendoza, Erin O’Neil, Alani Taylor, and Ben Wolfe. Lastly, we thank F. Robert Wesley, Carmen Chapin, and Kathy Bailey for providing data and expertise on fen plant communities, soils, and hydrology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter A. Weishampel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weishampel, P.A., Bedford, B.L. Wetland dicots and monocots differ in colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and dark septate endophytes. Mycorrhiza 16, 495–502 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-006-0064-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-006-0064-7

Keywords

Navigation