Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A preliminary survey of the arbuscular mycorrhizal status of grassland plants in southern Tibet

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Mycorrhiza Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report for the first time the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) status of native plant species and AM fungal diversity in the grasslands of southern Tibet. A total of 51 soil samples were collected from the rhizospheres of the dominant plant species, and AM fungal structures were observed in 18 (82%) of 22 plant species examined. Vesicles and aseptate hyphae were the structures most frequently observed in the plant roots. After trap culture for 5 months, 25 AM fungal taxa were identified in the soil samples collected, of which nine belonged to Glomus, ten to Acaulospora, one to Entrophospora and five to Scutellospora. The frequency of occurrence of different genera and species varied greatly. Glomus was the dominant genus, and the most frequent and abundant species was Glomus mosseae. Over the whole sampling area, spore density in the rhizosphere soil of different host plant species ranged from 2 to 66 per 20 g air-dried soil. Overall AM fungal species richness was 2.10 and species diversity was 2.35. AM fungal diversity was also compared among the four different land use types (farmland and normal, disturbed and highly disturbed montane scrub grassland). Spore densities in the farmland and normal grassland were much higher than in the grasslands that had been degraded to varying degrees. The species richness in normal grassland was the highest of the four land use types examined. Species diversity varied from 1.99 to 0.94 and was highest in normal grassland, intermediate in degraded grassland and farmland, and lowest in the highly disturbed grassland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anken T, Weisskopf P, Zihlmann U, Forrer H, Jansa J, Perhacova K (2004) Long-term tillage system effects under moist cool conditions in Switzerland. Soil Tillage Res 78:171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azcón-Aguilar C, Palenzuela EJ, Roldan A, Bautista S, Vallejo R, Barea JM (2002) Analysis of the mycorrhizal potential in the rhizosphere of representative plant species from desertification-threatened Mediterranean shrublands. Appl Soil Ecol 21:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bever JD (2002) Host-specificity of AM fungal population growth rates can generate feedback on plant growth. Plant Soil 244:281–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bever D, Morton JB, Antonovics J, Schultz PA (1996) Host-dependent sporulation and species diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a mown grassland. J Ecol 84:71–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bever JD, Schultz PA, Pringle A, Morton JB (2001) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: more diverse than meets the eye, and the ecological tale of why. Bioscience 51:923–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddington CL, Dodd JC (2000) The effect of agricultural practices on the development of indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. I. Field studies in an Indonesian ultisol. Plant Soil 218:137–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burrows RL, Pfleger FL (2002) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi respond to increasing plant diversity. Can J Bot 80:120–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels BA, Skipper HD (1982) Methods for the recovery and quantitative of propagules from soil. In: NC Schenck (ed) Methods and principles of mycorrhizal research. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN, pp 29–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrol N, Calvente R, Cano C, Barea JM, Azcón-Aguilar C (2004) Analysing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity in shrub-associated resource islands from a desertification threatened semiarid Mediterranean ecosystem. Appl Soil Ecol 25:123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham JH (2001) What do root pathogens see in mycorrhizas? New Phytol 148:357–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartnett DC, Wilson GWT (2002) The role of mycorrhizas in plant community structure and dynamics: lessons from grasslands. Plant Soil 244:319–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch AM, Kapulnik Y (1998) Signal transduction pathways in mycorrhizal associations: comparison with the Rhizobium-legume symbiosis. Fungal Genet Biol 23:205–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jansa J, Mozafar A, Anken T, Ruh R, Sanders IR, Frossard E (2002) Diversity and structure of AMF communities as affected by tillage in a temperate soil. Mycorrhiza 12:225–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jasper DA, Abbot LK, Robson AD (1991) The effect of soil disturbance on vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soils from different vegetation types. New Phytol 118:471–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayachandran K, Shetty KG (2003) Growth response and phosphorus uptake by arbuscular mycorrhizae of wet prairie sawgrass. Aquat Bot 76:281–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson NC (1993) Can fertilization of soil select less mutualistic mycorrhizae? Ecol Appl 3:749–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klironomos JN, Hart MM, Gurney JE, Moutoglis P (2001) Interspecific differences in the tolerance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to freezing and drying. Can J Bot 79:1161–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koide R, Dickie IA (2002) Effects of mycorrhizal fungi on plant populations. Plant Soil 244:307–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen RB, Schmidt SK (1993) Mycorrhizal infection, phosphorus uptake and phenology in Ranunculus adoneus: implications for the functioning of mycorrhizas in alpine systems. Oecologia 94:229–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthukumar T, Udaiyan K, Shanmughavel P (2004) Mycorrhiza in sedges: an overview. Mycorrhiza 14:65–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor PJ, Smith SE, Smith FA (2002) Arbuscular mycorrhizas influence plant diversity and community structure in a semiarid herbland. New Phytol 154:209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JM, Hayman DS (1970) Improved procedures for cleaning and staining parasitic and vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans Br Mycol Soc 55:158–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read DJ, Haselwandter K (1981) Observation on the mycorrhizal status of some alpine plant communities. New Phytol 88:341–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter BS, Tiller RL, Stutz JC (2002) Assessment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal propagules and colonization from abandoned agricultural fields and semi–arid grasslands in riparian floodplains. Appl Soil Ecol 20:227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenck NC, Perez Y (1990) Manual for the identification of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. INVAM, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith MR, Charvat I, Jacobson RL (1998) Arbuscular mycorrhizae promote establishment of prairie species in a tallgras prairie restoration. Can J Bot 76:1947–1954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stutz JC, Morton JB (1996) Successive pot cultures reveal high species richness of arbuscular endomycorrhizal fungi in arid ecosystems. Can J Bot 74:1883–1889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stutz JC, Copeman R, Martin CA, Morton JB (2000) Patterns of species composition and distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in arid regions of southwestern North America and Namibia, Africa. Can J Bot 78:237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden MGA, Klironomos JN, Ursic M, Moutoglis P, Streitwolf-Engel R, Boller T, Wiemken A, Sanders IR (1998) Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature 396:69–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang MQ, Wang YS, Zhang C (1994) The ecological distribution of AM fungi in North China. Mycosystema 13:166–172

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Nature Science Foundation of China (40571078 and 30470341) and the Royal Society (China Exchanges Project 15360) for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to X. L. Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gai, J.P., Feng, G., Cai, X.B. et al. A preliminary survey of the arbuscular mycorrhizal status of grassland plants in southern Tibet. Mycorrhiza 16, 191–196 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-005-0032-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-005-0032-7

Keywords

Navigation